Clinical perspectives on the virtual human twin: an overview of engagement and adoption challenges.

IF 7.7 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Laura Bevis, Elisa Rauseo, Anna Hebda-Boon, Dylan Morrissey, Wahbi El-Bouri, Nigel Tai, Steffen Petersen, Anthony Mathur, Greg Gibran Slabaugh, Caroline Roney
{"title":"Clinical perspectives on the virtual human twin: an overview of engagement and adoption challenges.","authors":"Laura Bevis, Elisa Rauseo, Anna Hebda-Boon, Dylan Morrissey, Wahbi El-Bouri, Nigel Tai, Steffen Petersen, Anthony Mathur, Greg Gibran Slabaugh, Caroline Roney","doi":"10.1088/2516-1091/aead6b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital twins (DTs) in healthcare have the potential to transform patient care, but their adoption depends critically on the perspectives of clinical professionals, pa-tients, and the public. As part of the Ecosystem for Digital Twins in Healthcare (EDITH) initiative, we undertook a programme of targeted engagement to under-stand, explore and integrate these perspectives into the development of the Euro-pean Virtual Human Twin (VHT). Methods included surveys, breakout sessions at public ecosystem meetings, and three dedicated workshops with clinicians and pa-tient representatives covering cardiovascular and musculoskeletal applications.&#xD;&#xD;Key findings emphasised the need for early and sustained end-user involvement to ensure that DTs in healthcare address unmet clinical needs, improve patient out-comes, and demonstrate cost-effectiveness. Participants identified practical chal-lenges in data access, validation, regulation, and integration into hospital systems, as well as broader socio-economic and trust-related concerns. Opportunities were also recognised for using digital twins to influence patient behaviour, enhance pre-ventive care, and support medical education.&#xD;From these insights, we identified recommendations across six themes: inclusion, clinical relevance, integration and validation, trust and equity, patient involvement, and incentives. The outcomes of this work provide an important step towards im-proving clinical interest, engagement, and eventual uptake in DTs in healthcare. Incorporating these perspectives into the VHT roadmap has strengthened its alignment with real-world clinical priorities and patient needs, supporting EDITH's vision of a sustainable and clinically impactful digital twin ecosystem. Further work is needed to extend this research across a wider range of clinical and patient stakeholder groups, and additional complex, multi-parametric clinical environments such as oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":74582,"journal":{"name":"Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1091/aead6b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital twins (DTs) in healthcare have the potential to transform patient care, but their adoption depends critically on the perspectives of clinical professionals, pa-tients, and the public. As part of the Ecosystem for Digital Twins in Healthcare (EDITH) initiative, we undertook a programme of targeted engagement to under-stand, explore and integrate these perspectives into the development of the Euro-pean Virtual Human Twin (VHT). Methods included surveys, breakout sessions at public ecosystem meetings, and three dedicated workshops with clinicians and pa-tient representatives covering cardiovascular and musculoskeletal applications. Key findings emphasised the need for early and sustained end-user involvement to ensure that DTs in healthcare address unmet clinical needs, improve patient out-comes, and demonstrate cost-effectiveness. Participants identified practical chal-lenges in data access, validation, regulation, and integration into hospital systems, as well as broader socio-economic and trust-related concerns. Opportunities were also recognised for using digital twins to influence patient behaviour, enhance pre-ventive care, and support medical education. From these insights, we identified recommendations across six themes: inclusion, clinical relevance, integration and validation, trust and equity, patient involvement, and incentives. The outcomes of this work provide an important step towards im-proving clinical interest, engagement, and eventual uptake in DTs in healthcare. Incorporating these perspectives into the VHT roadmap has strengthened its alignment with real-world clinical priorities and patient needs, supporting EDITH's vision of a sustainable and clinically impactful digital twin ecosystem. Further work is needed to extend this research across a wider range of clinical and patient stakeholder groups, and additional complex, multi-parametric clinical environments such as oncology.

虚拟人类双胞胎的临床观点:参与和采用挑战的概述。
医疗保健领域的数字孪生体(DTs)具有改变患者护理的潜力,但它们的采用主要取决于临床专业人员、患者和公众的观点。作为医疗保健数字双胞胎生态系统(EDITH)倡议的一部分,我们开展了一项有针对性的参与计划,以了解、探索并将这些观点整合到欧洲虚拟人类双胞胎(VHT)的开发中。方法包括调查、公共生态系统会议的分组会议,以及由临床医生和患者代表参加的三个专门研讨会,涵盖心血管和肌肉骨骼应用。主要发现强调了终端用户早期和持续参与的必要性,以确保医疗保健领域的直接诊断技术解决未满足的临床需求,改善患者预后,并展示成本效益。与会者确定了数据访问、验证、监管和整合到医院系统以及更广泛的社会经济和信任相关问题方面的实际挑战。我们还认识到利用数字双胞胎影响患者行为、加强预防保健和支持医学教育的机会。根据这些见解,我们确定了六个主题的建议:包容、临床相关性、整合和验证、信任和公平、患者参与和激励。这项工作的结果为提高临床兴趣、参与和最终在医疗保健中采用DTs提供了重要的一步。将这些观点纳入VHT路线图,加强了其与现实世界临床优先事项和患者需求的一致性,支持EDITH对可持续和临床影响的数字双胞胎生态系统的愿景。需要进一步的工作将这项研究扩展到更广泛的临床和患者利益相关者群体,以及其他复杂的多参数临床环境,如肿瘤学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书