Migraine care in the digital era: social listening insights and neurologists' perspectives from Türkiye.

IF 5.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2026-09-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2026.1891640
Derya Uluduz, Pınar Yalınay Dikmen, Burcin Yazici, Aynur Ozge
{"title":"Migraine care in the digital era: social listening insights and neurologists' perspectives from Türkiye.","authors":"Derya Uluduz, Pınar Yalınay Dikmen, Burcin Yazici, Aynur Ozge","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2026.1891640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore migraine-related concerns expressed in user-generated digital entries from a Turkish online health platform and contextualize them through neurologists' expert perspectives. Background: Digital platforms may shape symptom interpretation, treatment expectations, and communication; however, social-listening findings require cautious interpretation given platform-related and methodological limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This exploratory study combined secondary interpretation of a pre-existing proprietary Kimola social-listening report with a survey of 10 neurologists with headache expertise. The report included analytical outputs from 2,500 migraine-related user-generated entries posted on Doktorsitesi.com between 2007 and 2023. Because raw entries, preprocessing records, and coding files were unavailable to the authors, findings were interpreted descriptively as source-report outputs. Neurologist responses were summarized as raw counts and narratively contextualized with entry-derived themes, without formal mixed-methods integration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the source report, entries were categorized into four migraine-journey stages: pre-treatment, treatment phase, disease experience, and post-treatment. These stages reflected symptom interpretation and diagnostic uncertainty, treatment effectiveness and safety concerns, broader disease burden, and discontinuation or interest in non-oral, procedural, or complementary options after treatment. In the survey, 7 of 10 neurologists agreed or strongly agreed that many people with migraine use social media for migraine-related information, and 9 of 10 agreed or strongly agreed that misinformation complicates physician-patient communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among digitally engaged platform users, migraine-related entries revealed unmet information needs and treatment-related concerns. Neurologists highlighted the need for expert-led, evidence-based digital education. Although exploratory and not statistically generalizable, these findings may inform communication and digital education strategies in migraine care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"8 ","pages":"1891640"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2026.1891640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore migraine-related concerns expressed in user-generated digital entries from a Turkish online health platform and contextualize them through neurologists' expert perspectives. Background: Digital platforms may shape symptom interpretation, treatment expectations, and communication; however, social-listening findings require cautious interpretation given platform-related and methodological limitations.

Methods: This exploratory study combined secondary interpretation of a pre-existing proprietary Kimola social-listening report with a survey of 10 neurologists with headache expertise. The report included analytical outputs from 2,500 migraine-related user-generated entries posted on Doktorsitesi.com between 2007 and 2023. Because raw entries, preprocessing records, and coding files were unavailable to the authors, findings were interpreted descriptively as source-report outputs. Neurologist responses were summarized as raw counts and narratively contextualized with entry-derived themes, without formal mixed-methods integration.

Results: According to the source report, entries were categorized into four migraine-journey stages: pre-treatment, treatment phase, disease experience, and post-treatment. These stages reflected symptom interpretation and diagnostic uncertainty, treatment effectiveness and safety concerns, broader disease burden, and discontinuation or interest in non-oral, procedural, or complementary options after treatment. In the survey, 7 of 10 neurologists agreed or strongly agreed that many people with migraine use social media for migraine-related information, and 9 of 10 agreed or strongly agreed that misinformation complicates physician-patient communication.

Conclusions: Among digitally engaged platform users, migraine-related entries revealed unmet information needs and treatment-related concerns. Neurologists highlighted the need for expert-led, evidence-based digital education. Although exploratory and not statistically generalizable, these findings may inform communication and digital education strategies in migraine care.

数字时代的偏头痛护理:社会倾听的见解和神经学家从 rkiye的观点。
目的:探讨来自土耳其在线健康平台的用户生成的数字条目中表达的与偏头痛相关的担忧,并通过神经学家的专家观点对其进行背景分析。背景:数字平台可能会影响症状解释、治疗期望和沟通;然而,由于平台相关和方法上的限制,社交倾听的研究结果需要谨慎解释。方法:本探索性研究结合了对已有专有Kimola社会聆听报告的二次解释和对10名头痛专家的调查。该报告包括2007年至2023年期间在Doktorsitesi.com上发布的2500个与偏头痛相关的用户生成条目的分析结果。因为原始条目、预处理记录和编码文件对作者来说是不可用的,所以结果被描述性地解释为源报告输出。神经科医生的反应被总结为原始计数,并与入门衍生主题进行叙事背景化,没有正式的混合方法整合。结果:根据源报告,条目被分为四个偏头痛旅行阶段:治疗前、治疗期、疾病经历和治疗后。这些阶段反映了症状解释和诊断的不确定性、治疗有效性和安全性问题、更广泛的疾病负担,以及治疗后对非口服、程序性或补充选择的停药或兴趣。在调查中,7 / 10的神经科医生同意或强烈同意许多偏头痛患者使用社交媒体获取偏头痛相关信息,9 / 10的人同意或强烈同意错误信息使医患沟通复杂化。结论:在数字参与平台的用户中,偏头痛相关条目揭示了未满足的信息需求和治疗相关问题。神经学家强调了专家主导、以证据为基础的数字教育的必要性。尽管这些发现是探索性的,不能在统计上推广,但它们可以为偏头痛治疗的沟通和数字教育策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书