{"title":"Circulating miR-181a-3p, ATR, and HMGB-1 as Integrated Predictors of Induction Blast Clearance in Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia.","authors":"Resti Mulya Sari, Lyana Setiawan, Damai Santosa, Melva Louisa, Syarifah Dewi, Ikhwan Rinaldi, Noorwati Sutandyo, Anderson Cenweikiawan","doi":"10.31557/APJCP.2026.27.9.3479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 71 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML who received standard \"7+3\" induction chemotherapy. Baseline circulating miR-181a-3p and miR-181b-5p levels were quantified using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, while ATM, ATR, and HMGB-1 protein levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Induction blast clearance was defined as a post-induction bone marrow blast count of <5%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine optimal cut-off values. Associations were evaluated using Spearman correlation and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Circulating miR-181a-3p demonstrated limited discriminatory performance (AUC = 0.564), while HMGB-1 showed modest performance (AUC = 0.615). Using ROC-derived cut-off values, low baseline miR-181a-3p expression was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of achieving induction blast clearance in monocytic AML (FAB M4-M5) (RR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.18-4.63, p = 0.015), but not in non-monocytic subtypes. Higher ATR (RR = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.99-2.38, p = 0.047) and HMGB-1 levels (RR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.04-2.50, p = 0.031) were also associated with improved induction response. Circulating miR-181a-3p correlated with baseline bone marrow blast percentage, suggesting its potential as a surrogate marker for leukemic burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Circulating miR-181a-3p, ATR, and HMGB-1 are associated with induction blast clearance in AML, with lineage-specific effects observed for miR-181a-3p. Although the individual biomarkers demonstrated limited discriminatory performance, their integration may provide clinically relevant insights into early treatment response.</p>","PeriodicalId":55451,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":"27 9","pages":"3479-3485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2026.27.9.3479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Methods: This study included 71 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML who received standard "7+3" induction chemotherapy. Baseline circulating miR-181a-3p and miR-181b-5p levels were quantified using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, while ATM, ATR, and HMGB-1 protein levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Induction blast clearance was defined as a post-induction bone marrow blast count of <5%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine optimal cut-off values. Associations were evaluated using Spearman correlation and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals.
Results: Circulating miR-181a-3p demonstrated limited discriminatory performance (AUC = 0.564), while HMGB-1 showed modest performance (AUC = 0.615). Using ROC-derived cut-off values, low baseline miR-181a-3p expression was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of achieving induction blast clearance in monocytic AML (FAB M4-M5) (RR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.18-4.63, p = 0.015), but not in non-monocytic subtypes. Higher ATR (RR = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.99-2.38, p = 0.047) and HMGB-1 levels (RR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.04-2.50, p = 0.031) were also associated with improved induction response. Circulating miR-181a-3p correlated with baseline bone marrow blast percentage, suggesting its potential as a surrogate marker for leukemic burden.
Conclusion: Circulating miR-181a-3p, ATR, and HMGB-1 are associated with induction blast clearance in AML, with lineage-specific effects observed for miR-181a-3p. Although the individual biomarkers demonstrated limited discriminatory performance, their integration may provide clinically relevant insights into early treatment response.
期刊介绍:
Cancer is a very complex disease. While many aspects of carcinoge-nesis and oncogenesis are known, cancer control and prevention at the community level is however still in its infancy. Much more work needs to be done and many more steps need to be taken before effective strategies are developed. The multidisciplinary approaches and efforts to understand and control cancer in an effective and efficient manner, require highly trained scientists in all branches of the cancer sciences, from cellular and molecular aspects to patient care and palliation.
The Asia Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention (APOCP) and its official publication, the Asia Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (APJCP), have served the community of cancer scientists very well and intends to continue to serve in this capacity to the best of its abilities. One of the objectives of the APOCP is to provide all relevant and current scientific information on the whole spectrum of cancer sciences. They aim to do this by providing a forum for communication and propagation of original and innovative research findings that have relevance to understanding the etiology, progression, treatment, and survival of patients, through their journal. The APJCP with its distinguished, diverse, and Asia-wide team of editors, reviewers, and readers, ensure the highest standards of research communication within the cancer sciences community across Asia as well as globally.
The APJCP publishes original research results under the following categories:
-Epidemiology, detection and screening.
-Cellular research and bio-markers.
-Identification of bio-targets and agents with novel mechanisms of action.
-Optimal clinical use of existing anti-cancer agents, including combination therapies.
-Radiation and surgery.
-Palliative care.
-Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction.
-Health economic evaluations.