Sex-specific shape models to disentangle sex effects and age-associated anatomical variation in biventricular cardiac anatomy.

European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice Pub Date : 2026-09-07 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjimp/qyag156
Stefano Buoso, Valery L Visser, Pia Leuders, Tobias Kudelka, Maximilian Fuetterer, Christina Spengler, Robert Manka, Sebastian Kozerke
{"title":"Sex-specific shape models to disentangle sex effects and age-associated anatomical variation in biventricular cardiac anatomy.","authors":"Stefano Buoso, Valery L Visser, Pia Leuders, Tobias Kudelka, Maximilian Fuetterer, Christina Spengler, Robert Manka, Sebastian Kozerke","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyag156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Age- and sex-related differences in cardiac anatomy are well established using conventional cardiovascular magnetic resonance biomarkers, but their representation in 3D ventricular shape remains unclear. In pooled statistical shape models, leading modes may be dominated by between-sex anatomical variation, potentially obscuring within-sex age-associated variation. This study evaluated whether sex-specific statistical shape models provide a more interpretable representation of age-associated ventricular variation than a sex-agnostic model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Biventricular meshes were reconstructed from cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images in a cross-sectional screened asymptomatic Swiss adult cohort aged 18-85 years. End-diastolic anatomies from 185 male and 187 female participants were used to construct statistical shape models for the pooled cohort and separately by sex. Shape modes were interpreted using anatomical visualization, variance decomposition, associations with conventional demographic, anthropometric, and CMR biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first pooled model mode explained 31% of total shape variance, compared with 22% and 19% for the first male- and female-specific modes. In the pooled model, 57% of first-mode variance was attributable to between-sex differences. Age-associated variation in the pooled model was distributed across the first two modes, whereas sex-specific models organized age-associated variation within each sex. In males, the strongest adjusted age association occurred in the second sex-specific mode, which correlated with ventricular volume and mass. In females, age-associated variation was concentrated in the first mode and was inversely associated with ventricular volumes and myocardial mass.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support sex-specific anatomical reference models for capturing within-sex cardiac ageing structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":94317,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","volume":"4 2","pages":"qyag156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyag156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Age- and sex-related differences in cardiac anatomy are well established using conventional cardiovascular magnetic resonance biomarkers, but their representation in 3D ventricular shape remains unclear. In pooled statistical shape models, leading modes may be dominated by between-sex anatomical variation, potentially obscuring within-sex age-associated variation. This study evaluated whether sex-specific statistical shape models provide a more interpretable representation of age-associated ventricular variation than a sex-agnostic model.

Methods: Biventricular meshes were reconstructed from cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images in a cross-sectional screened asymptomatic Swiss adult cohort aged 18-85 years. End-diastolic anatomies from 185 male and 187 female participants were used to construct statistical shape models for the pooled cohort and separately by sex. Shape modes were interpreted using anatomical visualization, variance decomposition, associations with conventional demographic, anthropometric, and CMR biomarkers.

Results: The first pooled model mode explained 31% of total shape variance, compared with 22% and 19% for the first male- and female-specific modes. In the pooled model, 57% of first-mode variance was attributable to between-sex differences. Age-associated variation in the pooled model was distributed across the first two modes, whereas sex-specific models organized age-associated variation within each sex. In males, the strongest adjusted age association occurred in the second sex-specific mode, which correlated with ventricular volume and mass. In females, age-associated variation was concentrated in the first mode and was inversely associated with ventricular volumes and myocardial mass.

Conclusion: These findings support sex-specific anatomical reference models for capturing within-sex cardiac ageing structure.

性别特异性形状模型,以解开双室心脏解剖中的性别影响和年龄相关的解剖变异。
目的:使用传统的心血管磁共振生物标志物可以很好地确定心脏解剖中与年龄和性别相关的差异,但它们在三维心室形状中的表现仍不清楚。在汇总统计形状模型中,主要模式可能由性别之间的解剖差异主导,潜在地模糊了性别内年龄相关的差异。本研究评估了性别特异性统计形状模型是否比性别不可知模型更能解释与年龄相关的心室变异。方法:对18-85岁的无症状瑞士成年人进行横断面筛选,通过心血管磁共振(CMR)图像重建双心室网。来自185名男性和187名女性参与者的舒张末期解剖结构用于构建合并队列的统计形状模型,并按性别分开。使用解剖可视化、方差分解、与传统人口统计学、人体测量学和CMR生物标志物的关联来解释形状模式。结果:第一种混合模型模式解释了31%的总形状差异,而第一种男性和女性特定模式分别解释了22%和19%。在混合模型中,57%的第一模态方差可归因于性别差异。在混合模型中,年龄相关的变异分布在前两种模式中,而性别特异性模型则在每个性别中组织年龄相关的变异。在男性中,最强烈的调整年龄关联发生在第二种性别特异性模式中,它与心室体积和质量相关。在女性中,年龄相关的变化集中在第一种模式,与心室容积和心肌质量呈负相关。结论:这些发现支持性别特异性解剖参考模型来捕获性别内心脏老化结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书