Neurocognitive endophenotypes in neurodevelopmental disorders: social cognition and executive functions in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Level 1 and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

IF 1.5
Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry Pub Date : 2026-09-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frcha.2026.1920753
Grazia Maria Giovanna Pastorino, Miriam Olivieri, Antonio Aquino, Noemi Mungo, Rossella Suriano, Francesca Felicia Operto
{"title":"Neurocognitive endophenotypes in neurodevelopmental disorders: social cognition and executive functions in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Level 1 and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.","authors":"Grazia Maria Giovanna Pastorino, Miriam Olivieri, Antonio Aquino, Noemi Mungo, Rossella Suriano, Francesca Felicia Operto","doi":"10.3389/frcha.2026.1920753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Executive Functions (EF) and Social Cognition (SC) show strong interdependence, yet it remains unclear whether social difficulties in neurodevelopmental disorders, such as Autism Spectrum Disorder Level 1 (ASD1) and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), arise from shared EF related mechanisms or reflect disorder specific neurocognitive architectures. Comparative studies integrating both ecological and performance based measures remain scarce. This study aims to analyze the relationship between executive functions and Social Cognition skills across three matched developmental groups: Autism Spectrum Disorder Level 1 (ASD1), Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and Typical Development (TD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 123 children aged 6-11 years participated in the study: ASD1 (<i>N</i> = 42), ADHD (<i>N</i> = 43), and TD (<i>N</i> = 38). Participants were evaluated using the WISC-IV, BRIEF-2, and selected subtests of the NEPSY-II. Non-parametric group comparisons and multiple linear regression models within the clinical groups were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both clinical groups showed widespread EF and SC impairments compared to TD peers, but with distinct profiles. ADHD exhibited pronounced deficits in inhibition and attentional control (Inhibition, Auditory/Visual Attention), whereas ASD1 showed greater impairment in SC (ToM, AR), cognitive flexibility (Shift), and rule-guided tasks (Response Set, DesignFluency). Regression models revealed disorder-specific EF-SC relationships: in ADHD, SC performance was strongly scaffolded by EF (Inhibition, Auditory Attention, Design Fluency; ToM model R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72). In ASD1, ToM was predicted primarily by AR and Response Set (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.55), indicating relative independence from basic inhibitory and attentional resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite superficially similar social difficulties, ASD1 and ADHD display distinct patterns of association between EF and SC: executive-regulatory deficits in ADHD versus primary mentalizing and shifting impairments in ASD1. These findings support the need for transdiagnostic profiling to optimize early screening and to guide targeted, domain-specific rehabilitative and psychoeducational interventions for each diagnostic profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":73074,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","volume":"5 ","pages":"1920753"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2026.1920753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Executive Functions (EF) and Social Cognition (SC) show strong interdependence, yet it remains unclear whether social difficulties in neurodevelopmental disorders, such as Autism Spectrum Disorder Level 1 (ASD1) and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), arise from shared EF related mechanisms or reflect disorder specific neurocognitive architectures. Comparative studies integrating both ecological and performance based measures remain scarce. This study aims to analyze the relationship between executive functions and Social Cognition skills across three matched developmental groups: Autism Spectrum Disorder Level 1 (ASD1), Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and Typical Development (TD).

Methods: A total of 123 children aged 6-11 years participated in the study: ASD1 (N = 42), ADHD (N = 43), and TD (N = 38). Participants were evaluated using the WISC-IV, BRIEF-2, and selected subtests of the NEPSY-II. Non-parametric group comparisons and multiple linear regression models within the clinical groups were performed.

Results: Both clinical groups showed widespread EF and SC impairments compared to TD peers, but with distinct profiles. ADHD exhibited pronounced deficits in inhibition and attentional control (Inhibition, Auditory/Visual Attention), whereas ASD1 showed greater impairment in SC (ToM, AR), cognitive flexibility (Shift), and rule-guided tasks (Response Set, DesignFluency). Regression models revealed disorder-specific EF-SC relationships: in ADHD, SC performance was strongly scaffolded by EF (Inhibition, Auditory Attention, Design Fluency; ToM model R2 = 0.72). In ASD1, ToM was predicted primarily by AR and Response Set (R2 = 0.55), indicating relative independence from basic inhibitory and attentional resources.

Conclusions: Despite superficially similar social difficulties, ASD1 and ADHD display distinct patterns of association between EF and SC: executive-regulatory deficits in ADHD versus primary mentalizing and shifting impairments in ASD1. These findings support the need for transdiagnostic profiling to optimize early screening and to guide targeted, domain-specific rehabilitative and psychoeducational interventions for each diagnostic profile.

神经发育障碍的神经认知内表型:自闭症谱系障碍1级和注意缺陷/多动障碍儿童的社会认知和执行功能
导读:执行功能(EF)和社会认知(SC)表现出很强的相互依赖性,但神经发育障碍(如自闭症谱系障碍1级(ASD1)和注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD))的社会困难是由EF相关的共同机制引起的,还是反映了障碍特定的神经认知结构,目前尚不清楚。结合生态和绩效措施的比较研究仍然很少。本研究旨在分析自闭症谱系障碍1级(ASD1)、注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和典型发展型(TD)三个匹配发展组的执行功能与社会认知技能的关系。方法:共123例6 ~ 11岁儿童参与研究:ASD1 (N = 42)、ADHD (N = 43)、TD (N = 38)。使用WISC-IV、BRIEF-2和NEPSY-II的选定子测试对参与者进行评估。对临床组进行非参数组比较和多元线性回归模型。结果:与TD同龄人相比,两个临床组均表现出广泛的EF和SC损伤,但具有不同的特征。ADHD在抑制和注意力控制(抑制、听觉/视觉注意)方面表现出明显的缺陷,而ASD1在SC (ToM、AR)、认知灵活性(Shift)和规则引导任务(反应集、设计流畅性)方面表现出更大的缺陷。回归模型揭示了障碍特异性EF-SC之间的关系:在ADHD中,EF对SC的表现有很强的支撑作用(抑制、听觉注意、设计流畅性;ToM模型R2 = 0.72)。在ASD1中,ToM主要由AR和反应集预测(R2 = 0.55),表明相对独立于基本抑制资源和注意资源。结论:尽管表面上有相似的社交困难,但ASD1和ADHD在EF和SC之间表现出不同的关联模式:ADHD的执行-监管缺陷与ASD1的原发性精神化和转移障碍。这些发现支持了跨诊断分析的必要性,以优化早期筛查,并指导针对每种诊断特征的有针对性的、特定领域的康复和心理教育干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书