Sublingual allergen immunotherapy: evidence from randomized trials, real-world studies and meta-analyses.

IF 3.4 Q2 ALLERGY
Frontiers in allergy Pub Date : 2026-09-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/falgy.2026.1940709
Giovanni Paoletti, Nicolò Valli, Danilo Di Bona, Giulia Anna Maria Luigia Costanzo, Andrea Giovanni Ledda, Stefano Del Giacco, Mattia Giovannini, Francesco Catamerò, Francesca Mori, Giuseppe Guida, Fabio Luigi Massimo Ricciardolo, Francesca Bertolini, Remo Poto, Corrado Pelaia, Gilda Varricchi, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Enrico Heffler
{"title":"Sublingual allergen immunotherapy: evidence from randomized trials, real-world studies and meta-analyses.","authors":"Giovanni Paoletti, Nicolò Valli, Danilo Di Bona, Giulia Anna Maria Luigia Costanzo, Andrea Giovanni Ledda, Stefano Del Giacco, Mattia Giovannini, Francesco Catamerò, Francesca Mori, Giuseppe Guida, Fabio Luigi Massimo Ricciardolo, Francesca Bertolini, Remo Poto, Corrado Pelaia, Gilda Varricchi, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Enrico Heffler","doi":"10.3389/falgy.2026.1940709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allergen immunotherapy is the only potentially disease-modifying treatment for IgE-mediated respiratory allergy. Among the available routes, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has gained prominence because of its favorable safety profile and greater patient acceptability.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This narrative review critically appraises the clinical efficacy, real-world effectiveness, and long-term disease-modifying potential of SLIT for seasonal and perennial respiratory allergies by integrating evidence from randomized controlled trials, large observational cohorts, and meta-analyses, with attention to allergen- and product-specific outcomes and age-related differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Robust RCT evidence supports clinically meaningful reductions in symptoms and medication use with grass and HDM SLIT tablets, with sustained benefits observed up to 1-2 years after a 3-year treatment course in key trials. Real-world cohorts corroborate these findings and additionally report a reduced risk of new asthma onset and lower long-term medication dispensing after SLIT. Evidence for SLIT in asthma shows reductions in exacerbation risk in some trials, although its effects on day-to-day control are less consistent. Pediatric trials generally mirror adult outcomes, with favorable safety and efficacy, particularly for standardized tablets; however, heterogeneity across trials and historical methodological limitations remain important caveats. Meta-analyses confirm overall efficacy but highlight substantial between-study heterogeneity and the importance of product-specific evaluations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SLIT could be an effective, well-tolerated, disease-modifying option for respiratory allergic rhinitis and shows promise for selected asthma outcomes. Optimal benefits require standardized, adequately dosed formulations and sustained adherence (≥3 years). Future research should prioritize product-specific, adequately powered trials with standardized outcomes to refine patient selection and long-term disease-modification endpoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":73062,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in allergy","volume":"7 ","pages":"1940709"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2026.1940709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allergen immunotherapy is the only potentially disease-modifying treatment for IgE-mediated respiratory allergy. Among the available routes, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has gained prominence because of its favorable safety profile and greater patient acceptability.

Objectives: This narrative review critically appraises the clinical efficacy, real-world effectiveness, and long-term disease-modifying potential of SLIT for seasonal and perennial respiratory allergies by integrating evidence from randomized controlled trials, large observational cohorts, and meta-analyses, with attention to allergen- and product-specific outcomes and age-related differences.

Results: Robust RCT evidence supports clinically meaningful reductions in symptoms and medication use with grass and HDM SLIT tablets, with sustained benefits observed up to 1-2 years after a 3-year treatment course in key trials. Real-world cohorts corroborate these findings and additionally report a reduced risk of new asthma onset and lower long-term medication dispensing after SLIT. Evidence for SLIT in asthma shows reductions in exacerbation risk in some trials, although its effects on day-to-day control are less consistent. Pediatric trials generally mirror adult outcomes, with favorable safety and efficacy, particularly for standardized tablets; however, heterogeneity across trials and historical methodological limitations remain important caveats. Meta-analyses confirm overall efficacy but highlight substantial between-study heterogeneity and the importance of product-specific evaluations.

Conclusions: SLIT could be an effective, well-tolerated, disease-modifying option for respiratory allergic rhinitis and shows promise for selected asthma outcomes. Optimal benefits require standardized, adequately dosed formulations and sustained adherence (≥3 years). Future research should prioritize product-specific, adequately powered trials with standardized outcomes to refine patient selection and long-term disease-modification endpoints.

舌下过敏原免疫疗法:来自随机试验、真实世界研究和荟萃分析的证据。
背景:过敏原免疫疗法是ige介导的呼吸道过敏唯一可能改善疾病的治疗方法。在可用的途径中,舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)因其良好的安全性和更大的患者可接受性而受到重视。目的:这篇叙述性综述通过整合随机对照试验、大型观察性队列和荟萃分析的证据,对SLIT治疗季节性和常年性呼吸道过敏的临床疗效、实际疗效和长期疾病改善潜力进行了批判性评价,并关注过敏原和产品特异性结果以及年龄相关差异。结果:强有力的随机对照试验证据支持grass和HDM SLIT片在症状和药物使用方面有临床意义的减少,在关键试验中,3年疗程后持续1-2年观察到持续的益处。真实世界的队列证实了这些发现,并额外报告了SLIT后新哮喘发作风险降低和长期药物分配减少。在一些试验中,SLIT治疗哮喘的证据显示其可降低病情恶化的风险,尽管其对日常控制的影响不太一致。儿科试验通常反映成人结果,具有良好的安全性和有效性,特别是标准化片剂;然而,试验的异质性和历史方法的局限性仍然是重要的警告。荟萃分析证实了总体疗效,但强调了研究间的实质性异质性和产品特异性评估的重要性。结论:SLIT可能是治疗呼吸道变应性鼻炎的一种有效、耐受性良好、改善疾病的选择,并有望治疗特定的哮喘结局。最佳疗效需要标准化、剂量充足的制剂和持续的依从性(≥3年)。未来的研究应优先考虑产品特异性的、具有标准化结果的充分有力的试验,以完善患者选择和长期疾病改善终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书