Global Trends and Disparities in Cervical Cancer Control in Central Asia (1990-2023): A Comparative Age-Period-Cohort and Joinpoint Regression Analysis.

Q2 Medicine
Dinara Serikova-Esengeldina, Balday Issenova, Zukhra Siyazbekova, Umutzhan Samarova, Saule Rakhyzhanova, Kamila Akhmetova, Assiya Yessenbayeva, Zaituna Khismetova, Aliya Atabayeva
{"title":"Global Trends and Disparities in Cervical Cancer Control in Central Asia (1990-2023): A Comparative Age-Period-Cohort and Joinpoint Regression Analysis.","authors":"Dinara Serikova-Esengeldina, Balday Issenova, Zukhra Siyazbekova, Umutzhan Samarova, Saule Rakhyzhanova, Kamila Akhmetova, Assiya Yessenbayeva, Zaituna Khismetova, Aliya Atabayeva","doi":"10.31557/APJCP.2026.27.9.3307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer is a significant public health challenge that remains a leading cause of premature death among women in Central Asia, serving as a marker of health inequality. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, healthcare strategies diverged, creating disparate outcomes for women across the region. This study evaluates the long-term trends in cervical cancer incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) across Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, distinguishing between the life-saving potential of organized screening and the limitations of opportunistic approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comparative ecological study using the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2023 dataset (1990-2023). We analyzed trends in Age-Standardized Rates (ASR) and the absolute human burden of disease. Joinpoint regression was used to calculate the Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC). An Age-Period-Cohort (APC) model (intrinsic estimator) was employed to isolate \"period effects\" attributable to screening interventions from demographic and cohort factors. Ovarian cancer served as a descriptive comparative reference to contrast trends with another gynecological malignancy that lacks an organized population-based screening programme in the region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kazakhstan demonstrated a robust decline in mortality (ASR AAPC: -2.5%; 95% CI: -2.8 to -2.2), associated with a strong period effect following the scale-up of its organized national screening programme. In contrast, neighboring countries exhibited slower declines and face a critical demographic divergence (the 'scissors effect'): while statistical rates have stabilized, the absolute number of lives lost has nearly doubled since 1990 due to population growth. Furthermore, the disease affects women in the region at a younger age than the global average, amplifying the socioeconomic loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A widening gap in cancer control exists within Central Asia. Kazakhstan's experience indicates organized screening reduces mortality. To ensure regional health equity, neighboring countries must urgently transition to organized national programmes. This may be accelerated by adopting, technology-driven solutions like Artificial Intelligence (AI) to bridge resource gaps in underserved communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":55451,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":"27 9","pages":"3307-3313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2026.27.9.3307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is a significant public health challenge that remains a leading cause of premature death among women in Central Asia, serving as a marker of health inequality. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, healthcare strategies diverged, creating disparate outcomes for women across the region. This study evaluates the long-term trends in cervical cancer incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) across Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, distinguishing between the life-saving potential of organized screening and the limitations of opportunistic approaches.

Methods: We conducted a comparative ecological study using the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2023 dataset (1990-2023). We analyzed trends in Age-Standardized Rates (ASR) and the absolute human burden of disease. Joinpoint regression was used to calculate the Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC). An Age-Period-Cohort (APC) model (intrinsic estimator) was employed to isolate "period effects" attributable to screening interventions from demographic and cohort factors. Ovarian cancer served as a descriptive comparative reference to contrast trends with another gynecological malignancy that lacks an organized population-based screening programme in the region.

Results: Kazakhstan demonstrated a robust decline in mortality (ASR AAPC: -2.5%; 95% CI: -2.8 to -2.2), associated with a strong period effect following the scale-up of its organized national screening programme. In contrast, neighboring countries exhibited slower declines and face a critical demographic divergence (the 'scissors effect'): while statistical rates have stabilized, the absolute number of lives lost has nearly doubled since 1990 due to population growth. Furthermore, the disease affects women in the region at a younger age than the global average, amplifying the socioeconomic loss.

Conclusion: A widening gap in cancer control exists within Central Asia. Kazakhstan's experience indicates organized screening reduces mortality. To ensure regional health equity, neighboring countries must urgently transition to organized national programmes. This may be accelerated by adopting, technology-driven solutions like Artificial Intelligence (AI) to bridge resource gaps in underserved communities.

中亚地区宫颈癌控制的全球趋势和差异(1990-2023):一项比较年龄、时期队列和连接点回归分析。
背景:子宫颈癌是一项重大的公共卫生挑战,仍然是中亚妇女过早死亡的主要原因,是健康不平等的标志。苏联解体后,医疗保健战略出现分歧,给整个地区的妇女带来了不同的结果。本研究评估了哈萨克斯坦、吉尔吉斯斯坦、塔吉克斯坦、土库曼斯坦和乌兹别克斯坦的宫颈癌发病率、死亡率和残疾调整生命年(DALYs)的长期趋势,区分了有组织筛查的挽救生命潜力和机会性方法的局限性。方法:我们使用全球疾病负担(GBD)研究2023数据集(1990-2023)进行了比较生态学研究。我们分析了年龄标准化率(ASR)和绝对人类疾病负担的趋势。采用连接点回归计算平均年变化百分数(AAPC)。采用年龄-时期-队列(APC)模型(内在估计器)将可归因于筛查干预的“时期效应”从人口统计学和队列因素中分离出来。卵巢癌作为描述性比较参考,与该地区缺乏有组织的基于人群的筛查计划的另一种妇科恶性肿瘤进行对比。结果:哈萨克斯坦显示出死亡率的强劲下降(ASR AAPC: -2.5%; 95% CI: -2.8至-2.2),这与扩大有组织的国家筛查计划后的强劲时期效应有关。相比之下,邻国的下降速度较慢,并面临严重的人口分化(“剪刀效应”):虽然统计数据已趋于稳定,但由于人口增长,自1990年以来,死亡的绝对人数几乎翻了一番。此外,该疾病影响该区域妇女的年龄低于全球平均水平,扩大了社会经济损失。结论:中亚地区在癌症控制方面存在着越来越大的差距。哈萨克斯坦的经验表明,有组织的筛查可降低死亡率。为确保区域卫生公平,邻国必须紧急过渡到有组织的国家规划。采用人工智能(AI)等技术驱动的解决方案,弥合服务不足社区的资源差距,可能会加速这一进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
779
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Cancer is a very complex disease. While many aspects of carcinoge-nesis and oncogenesis are known, cancer control and prevention at the community level is however still in its infancy. Much more work needs to be done and many more steps need to be taken before effective strategies are developed. The multidisciplinary approaches and efforts to understand and control cancer in an effective and efficient manner, require highly trained scientists in all branches of the cancer sciences, from cellular and molecular aspects to patient care and palliation. The Asia Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention (APOCP) and its official publication, the Asia Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (APJCP), have served the community of cancer scientists very well and intends to continue to serve in this capacity to the best of its abilities. One of the objectives of the APOCP is to provide all relevant and current scientific information on the whole spectrum of cancer sciences. They aim to do this by providing a forum for communication and propagation of original and innovative research findings that have relevance to understanding the etiology, progression, treatment, and survival of patients, through their journal. The APJCP with its distinguished, diverse, and Asia-wide team of editors, reviewers, and readers, ensure the highest standards of research communication within the cancer sciences community across Asia as well as globally. The APJCP publishes original research results under the following categories: -Epidemiology, detection and screening. -Cellular research and bio-markers. -Identification of bio-targets and agents with novel mechanisms of action. -Optimal clinical use of existing anti-cancer agents, including combination therapies. -Radiation and surgery. -Palliative care. -Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction. -Health economic evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书