Global Trends and Disparities in Cervical Cancer Control in Central Asia (1990-2023): A Comparative Age-Period-Cohort and Joinpoint Regression Analysis.
{"title":"Global Trends and Disparities in Cervical Cancer Control in Central Asia (1990-2023): A Comparative Age-Period-Cohort and Joinpoint Regression Analysis.","authors":"Dinara Serikova-Esengeldina, Balday Issenova, Zukhra Siyazbekova, Umutzhan Samarova, Saule Rakhyzhanova, Kamila Akhmetova, Assiya Yessenbayeva, Zaituna Khismetova, Aliya Atabayeva","doi":"10.31557/APJCP.2026.27.9.3307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer is a significant public health challenge that remains a leading cause of premature death among women in Central Asia, serving as a marker of health inequality. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, healthcare strategies diverged, creating disparate outcomes for women across the region. This study evaluates the long-term trends in cervical cancer incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) across Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, distinguishing between the life-saving potential of organized screening and the limitations of opportunistic approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comparative ecological study using the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2023 dataset (1990-2023). We analyzed trends in Age-Standardized Rates (ASR) and the absolute human burden of disease. Joinpoint regression was used to calculate the Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC). An Age-Period-Cohort (APC) model (intrinsic estimator) was employed to isolate \"period effects\" attributable to screening interventions from demographic and cohort factors. Ovarian cancer served as a descriptive comparative reference to contrast trends with another gynecological malignancy that lacks an organized population-based screening programme in the region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kazakhstan demonstrated a robust decline in mortality (ASR AAPC: -2.5%; 95% CI: -2.8 to -2.2), associated with a strong period effect following the scale-up of its organized national screening programme. In contrast, neighboring countries exhibited slower declines and face a critical demographic divergence (the 'scissors effect'): while statistical rates have stabilized, the absolute number of lives lost has nearly doubled since 1990 due to population growth. Furthermore, the disease affects women in the region at a younger age than the global average, amplifying the socioeconomic loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A widening gap in cancer control exists within Central Asia. Kazakhstan's experience indicates organized screening reduces mortality. To ensure regional health equity, neighboring countries must urgently transition to organized national programmes. This may be accelerated by adopting, technology-driven solutions like Artificial Intelligence (AI) to bridge resource gaps in underserved communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":55451,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":"27 9","pages":"3307-3313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2026.27.9.3307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer is a significant public health challenge that remains a leading cause of premature death among women in Central Asia, serving as a marker of health inequality. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, healthcare strategies diverged, creating disparate outcomes for women across the region. This study evaluates the long-term trends in cervical cancer incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) across Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, distinguishing between the life-saving potential of organized screening and the limitations of opportunistic approaches.
Methods: We conducted a comparative ecological study using the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2023 dataset (1990-2023). We analyzed trends in Age-Standardized Rates (ASR) and the absolute human burden of disease. Joinpoint regression was used to calculate the Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC). An Age-Period-Cohort (APC) model (intrinsic estimator) was employed to isolate "period effects" attributable to screening interventions from demographic and cohort factors. Ovarian cancer served as a descriptive comparative reference to contrast trends with another gynecological malignancy that lacks an organized population-based screening programme in the region.
Results: Kazakhstan demonstrated a robust decline in mortality (ASR AAPC: -2.5%; 95% CI: -2.8 to -2.2), associated with a strong period effect following the scale-up of its organized national screening programme. In contrast, neighboring countries exhibited slower declines and face a critical demographic divergence (the 'scissors effect'): while statistical rates have stabilized, the absolute number of lives lost has nearly doubled since 1990 due to population growth. Furthermore, the disease affects women in the region at a younger age than the global average, amplifying the socioeconomic loss.
Conclusion: A widening gap in cancer control exists within Central Asia. Kazakhstan's experience indicates organized screening reduces mortality. To ensure regional health equity, neighboring countries must urgently transition to organized national programmes. This may be accelerated by adopting, technology-driven solutions like Artificial Intelligence (AI) to bridge resource gaps in underserved communities.
期刊介绍:
Cancer is a very complex disease. While many aspects of carcinoge-nesis and oncogenesis are known, cancer control and prevention at the community level is however still in its infancy. Much more work needs to be done and many more steps need to be taken before effective strategies are developed. The multidisciplinary approaches and efforts to understand and control cancer in an effective and efficient manner, require highly trained scientists in all branches of the cancer sciences, from cellular and molecular aspects to patient care and palliation.
The Asia Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention (APOCP) and its official publication, the Asia Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (APJCP), have served the community of cancer scientists very well and intends to continue to serve in this capacity to the best of its abilities. One of the objectives of the APOCP is to provide all relevant and current scientific information on the whole spectrum of cancer sciences. They aim to do this by providing a forum for communication and propagation of original and innovative research findings that have relevance to understanding the etiology, progression, treatment, and survival of patients, through their journal. The APJCP with its distinguished, diverse, and Asia-wide team of editors, reviewers, and readers, ensure the highest standards of research communication within the cancer sciences community across Asia as well as globally.
The APJCP publishes original research results under the following categories:
-Epidemiology, detection and screening.
-Cellular research and bio-markers.
-Identification of bio-targets and agents with novel mechanisms of action.
-Optimal clinical use of existing anti-cancer agents, including combination therapies.
-Radiation and surgery.
-Palliative care.
-Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction.
-Health economic evaluations.