{"title":"Impact of Diabetes, Hypertension, and Gut Microbial Diversity on Chemotherapy Response and Survival in Cancer Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Sobia Nadeem, Rajib Maitra, - Farah, Shovit Dutta, Khaizran Siddiqui, Rabia Zulfiqar, Mamtaz Mariam Asha, Salah Termos","doi":"10.31557/APJCP.2026.27.9.3377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Chronic comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus and hypertension, and gut microbial factors may influence chemotherapy response and survival in cancer patients. This study quantitatively evaluated their combined impact. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of diabetes, hypertension, and gut microbial diversity on chemotherapy response and survival in cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study enrolled 250 adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at a tertiary care center in Bangladesh. Clinical, metabolic, and microbiome data were collected at baseline and during treatment. Chemotherapy response was assessed by RECIST 1.1 criteria, while progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Gut microbial diversity was measured using 16S rRNA sequencing. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, t-tests, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and multivariable Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among participants, 32.8% had diabetes and 38.4% had hypertension. Objective response rates (CR+PR) were lower in patients with diabetes (41.5%) and hypertension (45.8%) compared with non-diabetic (57.1%) and normotensive (55.8%) patients (p < 0.05). Responders exhibited significantly lower HbA1c, fasting glucose, and systolic blood pressure than non-responders (p < 0.01). Higher gut microbial alpha diversity was observed in responders (Shannon index 4.1 ± 0.6) versus non-responders (3.4 ± 0.7; p < 0.001). Median PFS and OS were shorter in patients with diabetes (8.6 and 18.4 months) and hypertension (9.1 and 20.2 months) compared with those without comorbidities (12.9 and 26.7 months; 13.4 and 27.9 months, respectively). Multivariable analysis confirmed diabetes (aHR 1.58), hypertension (aHR 1.41), low microbial diversity (aHR 1.76), and advanced tumor stage (aHR 2.34) as independent predictors of worse survival (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diabetes, hypertension, and reduced gut microbial diversity are associated with poorer chemotherapy response and survival outcomes. Integrated management of metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities, alongside microbiome-informed interventions, may enhance treatment efficacy and patient survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":55451,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":"27 9","pages":"3377-3383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2026.27.9.3377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Chronic comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus and hypertension, and gut microbial factors may influence chemotherapy response and survival in cancer patients. This study quantitatively evaluated their combined impact. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of diabetes, hypertension, and gut microbial diversity on chemotherapy response and survival in cancer patients.
Methods: A prospective cohort study enrolled 250 adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at a tertiary care center in Bangladesh. Clinical, metabolic, and microbiome data were collected at baseline and during treatment. Chemotherapy response was assessed by RECIST 1.1 criteria, while progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Gut microbial diversity was measured using 16S rRNA sequencing. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, t-tests, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and multivariable Cox regression.
Results: Among participants, 32.8% had diabetes and 38.4% had hypertension. Objective response rates (CR+PR) were lower in patients with diabetes (41.5%) and hypertension (45.8%) compared with non-diabetic (57.1%) and normotensive (55.8%) patients (p < 0.05). Responders exhibited significantly lower HbA1c, fasting glucose, and systolic blood pressure than non-responders (p < 0.01). Higher gut microbial alpha diversity was observed in responders (Shannon index 4.1 ± 0.6) versus non-responders (3.4 ± 0.7; p < 0.001). Median PFS and OS were shorter in patients with diabetes (8.6 and 18.4 months) and hypertension (9.1 and 20.2 months) compared with those without comorbidities (12.9 and 26.7 months; 13.4 and 27.9 months, respectively). Multivariable analysis confirmed diabetes (aHR 1.58), hypertension (aHR 1.41), low microbial diversity (aHR 1.76), and advanced tumor stage (aHR 2.34) as independent predictors of worse survival (all p < 0.05).
Conclusions: Diabetes, hypertension, and reduced gut microbial diversity are associated with poorer chemotherapy response and survival outcomes. Integrated management of metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities, alongside microbiome-informed interventions, may enhance treatment efficacy and patient survival.
期刊介绍:
Cancer is a very complex disease. While many aspects of carcinoge-nesis and oncogenesis are known, cancer control and prevention at the community level is however still in its infancy. Much more work needs to be done and many more steps need to be taken before effective strategies are developed. The multidisciplinary approaches and efforts to understand and control cancer in an effective and efficient manner, require highly trained scientists in all branches of the cancer sciences, from cellular and molecular aspects to patient care and palliation.
The Asia Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention (APOCP) and its official publication, the Asia Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (APJCP), have served the community of cancer scientists very well and intends to continue to serve in this capacity to the best of its abilities. One of the objectives of the APOCP is to provide all relevant and current scientific information on the whole spectrum of cancer sciences. They aim to do this by providing a forum for communication and propagation of original and innovative research findings that have relevance to understanding the etiology, progression, treatment, and survival of patients, through their journal. The APJCP with its distinguished, diverse, and Asia-wide team of editors, reviewers, and readers, ensure the highest standards of research communication within the cancer sciences community across Asia as well as globally.
The APJCP publishes original research results under the following categories:
-Epidemiology, detection and screening.
-Cellular research and bio-markers.
-Identification of bio-targets and agents with novel mechanisms of action.
-Optimal clinical use of existing anti-cancer agents, including combination therapies.
-Radiation and surgery.
-Palliative care.
-Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction.
-Health economic evaluations.