{"title":"Safety of Mini-Midline Catheters for Intravenous Antimicrobial Therapy Not Exceeding 14 Days: Treatment Completion Rate and Re-Catheterization Needs.","authors":"Lihong Liao, Jianfang Zhang, Liqin Li, Yuling Feng, Qiu Sun, Yiqing Shen, Xiaojing Ma, Chaoyi Dong, Lihua Shi","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S620305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether ultrasound-guided mini-midline catheter use (8-15 cm) is associated with treatment completion and safety outcomes compared with short peripheral catheters (<8 cm) for intravenous antimicrobial therapy lasting no more than 14 days, while additionally characterizing device specifications, peripheral drug compatibility, and cumulative vascular-access burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective comparative cohort study included 134 hospitalized adults (55 mini-midline, 79 short PIVC) receiving planned intravenous antimicrobial therapy for 5-14 days. The primary endpoint was treatment completion through the index device. Secondary outcomes included catheter-related complications, re-catheterization, cumulative catheter burden, inflammatory markers, and descriptively summarized dwell time among devices with documented insertion and removal timestamps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment completion was 46/51 (90.2%) for mini-midlines and 79/79 (100.0%) for short PIVCs (unadjusted p=0.005; absolute RD -9.8%; Holm-adjusted p=0.015). Among devices with documented timestamps, median dwell time was 310.0 hours (12.9 days) for mini-midlines and 71.5 hours (3.0 days) for short PIVCs. Complication rates were low, with 3/55 mini-midline patients experiencing 5 catheter-related events and 0/79 short-PIVC patients experiencing catheter-related events. No bloodstream infection or symptomatic thrombosis occurred in either group. Mini-midline patients required fewer total PIVCs per treatment episode, while cumulative insertion attempts were 61 and 85 in the mini-midline and short-PIVC groups, respectively. Diabetes mellitus and ≥2 puncture attempts were associated with treatment non-completion in the mini-midline group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided mini-midlines were associated with acceptable safety, longer observed peripheral dwell time, and reduced overall PIVC burden in selected hospitalized patients receiving up to 14 days of peripherally compatible intravenous antimicrobial therapy. Mini-midlines should be considered a complementary vascular-access strategy rather than a universal replacement for short PIVCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"19 ","pages":"620305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13618561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S620305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether ultrasound-guided mini-midline catheter use (8-15 cm) is associated with treatment completion and safety outcomes compared with short peripheral catheters (<8 cm) for intravenous antimicrobial therapy lasting no more than 14 days, while additionally characterizing device specifications, peripheral drug compatibility, and cumulative vascular-access burden.
Methods: This single-center retrospective comparative cohort study included 134 hospitalized adults (55 mini-midline, 79 short PIVC) receiving planned intravenous antimicrobial therapy for 5-14 days. The primary endpoint was treatment completion through the index device. Secondary outcomes included catheter-related complications, re-catheterization, cumulative catheter burden, inflammatory markers, and descriptively summarized dwell time among devices with documented insertion and removal timestamps.
Results: Treatment completion was 46/51 (90.2%) for mini-midlines and 79/79 (100.0%) for short PIVCs (unadjusted p=0.005; absolute RD -9.8%; Holm-adjusted p=0.015). Among devices with documented timestamps, median dwell time was 310.0 hours (12.9 days) for mini-midlines and 71.5 hours (3.0 days) for short PIVCs. Complication rates were low, with 3/55 mini-midline patients experiencing 5 catheter-related events and 0/79 short-PIVC patients experiencing catheter-related events. No bloodstream infection or symptomatic thrombosis occurred in either group. Mini-midline patients required fewer total PIVCs per treatment episode, while cumulative insertion attempts were 61 and 85 in the mini-midline and short-PIVC groups, respectively. Diabetes mellitus and ≥2 puncture attempts were associated with treatment non-completion in the mini-midline group.
Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided mini-midlines were associated with acceptable safety, longer observed peripheral dwell time, and reduced overall PIVC burden in selected hospitalized patients receiving up to 14 days of peripherally compatible intravenous antimicrobial therapy. Mini-midlines should be considered a complementary vascular-access strategy rather than a universal replacement for short PIVCs.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.