Anatomic Features Associated with Operative Strategy in Minimally Invasive Gastric GIST Resection: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Tamar Tsenteradze, Steven P Bowers, Enrique F Elli
{"title":"Anatomic Features Associated with Operative Strategy in Minimally Invasive Gastric GIST Resection: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Tamar Tsenteradze, Steven P Bowers, Enrique F Elli","doi":"10.1177/10926429261491045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Operative decision-making in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) surgery is strongly influenced by tumor anatomy. Although surgeons routinely consider anatomic features such as proximity to the gastroesophageal junction, posterior wall location, and endophytic growth during operative planning, their combined association with operative strategy has not been systematically evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated whether commonly recognized anatomic features of gastric GISTs were associated with operative strategy in a contemporary minimally invasive surgical cohort. Tumors were characterized according to the presence of three predefined anatomic features: proximal location near the gastroesophageal junction, posterior wall involvement, and endophytic growth pattern. Cases were grouped as lower (0-1 features) or higher (2-3 features) complexity. The primary outcome was operative strategy, categorized as simple (wedge resection or enucleation) or complex (partial gastrectomy or transgastric resection). Associations between anatomic complexity and operative approach were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 83 patients were included, with 50 (60.2%) classified as lower complexity and 33 (39.8%) as higher complexity. Operative strategy varied significantly by complexity group. Tumors in the higher complexity group were more frequently managed with complex operative techniques, including partial gastrectomy and transgastric resection (<i>P</i> = .002). This association remained significant after adjustment for tumor size (odds ratio 2.87, 95% CI: 1.12-7.65, <i>P</i> = .031). A graded relationship was observed, with increasing use of complex techniques as the number of anatomical features increased. The robotic platform was used more frequently in higher complexity cases (<i>P</i> = .03). Perioperative outcomes were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recognized anatomical features of gastric GISTs were associated with operative strategy and reflected real-world surgical decision-making. Systematically describing these features may facilitate preoperative assessment and improve consistency in reporting operative approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261491045"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261491045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Operative decision-making in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) surgery is strongly influenced by tumor anatomy. Although surgeons routinely consider anatomic features such as proximity to the gastroesophageal junction, posterior wall location, and endophytic growth during operative planning, their combined association with operative strategy has not been systematically evaluated.

Methods: We evaluated whether commonly recognized anatomic features of gastric GISTs were associated with operative strategy in a contemporary minimally invasive surgical cohort. Tumors were characterized according to the presence of three predefined anatomic features: proximal location near the gastroesophageal junction, posterior wall involvement, and endophytic growth pattern. Cases were grouped as lower (0-1 features) or higher (2-3 features) complexity. The primary outcome was operative strategy, categorized as simple (wedge resection or enucleation) or complex (partial gastrectomy or transgastric resection). Associations between anatomic complexity and operative approach were evaluated.

Results: A total of 83 patients were included, with 50 (60.2%) classified as lower complexity and 33 (39.8%) as higher complexity. Operative strategy varied significantly by complexity group. Tumors in the higher complexity group were more frequently managed with complex operative techniques, including partial gastrectomy and transgastric resection (P = .002). This association remained significant after adjustment for tumor size (odds ratio 2.87, 95% CI: 1.12-7.65, P = .031). A graded relationship was observed, with increasing use of complex techniques as the number of anatomical features increased. The robotic platform was used more frequently in higher complexity cases (P = .03). Perioperative outcomes were comparable between groups.

Conclusions: Recognized anatomical features of gastric GISTs were associated with operative strategy and reflected real-world surgical decision-making. Systematically describing these features may facilitate preoperative assessment and improve consistency in reporting operative approaches.

微创胃间质瘤间质瘤切除术的解剖特征与手术策略:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
背景:胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)的手术决策受肿瘤解剖结构的强烈影响。尽管外科医生在手术计划时通常会考虑解剖特征,如靠近胃食管交界处、后壁位置和内生菌生长,但它们与手术策略的综合关系尚未得到系统评估。方法:我们评估了当代微创手术队列中常见的胃胃肠道间质瘤解剖特征是否与手术策略相关。肿瘤根据三个预先定义的解剖特征来表征:近端位置靠近胃食管交界处,后壁受累和内生生长模式。案例按复杂度低(0-1个特征)或高(2-3个特征)分组。主要结局是手术策略,分为简单(楔形切除或去核)或复杂(部分胃切除或经胃切除)。评估解剖复杂性与手术入路之间的关系。结果:共纳入83例患者,其中低复杂性50例(60.2%),高复杂性33例(39.8%)。不同复杂性组的手术策略差异显著。高复杂性组的肿瘤更常采用复杂的手术技术,包括胃部分切除术和经胃切除术(P = 0.002)。在调整肿瘤大小后,这种关联仍然显著(优势比2.87,95% CI: 1.12-7.65, P = 0.031)。随着解剖特征数量的增加,越来越多地使用复杂技术,观察到分级关系。机器人平台在复杂程度较高的病例中使用频率更高(P = .03)。两组围手术期结果具有可比性。结论:公认的胃gist解剖特征与手术策略相关,反映了现实世界的手术决策。系统地描述这些特征有助于术前评估和提高手术入路报告的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书