Respiratory Pressure and Sustained Performance Across Etiologic Categories of Voice Disorders: A Pilot Study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Narihiro Kodama, Hiroki Sato, Katsuya Nakamura, Kiyohito Hosokawa
{"title":"Respiratory Pressure and Sustained Performance Across Etiologic Categories of Voice Disorders: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Narihiro Kodama, Hiroki Sato, Katsuya Nakamura, Kiyohito Hosokawa","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2026.09.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether a data-driven composite factor reflecting respiratory pressure-generating capacity and sustained pressure performance differs across etiologic categories of voice disorders and to examine its associations with maximum phonation time (MPT) and cepstral measures of phonatory stability.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-three patients with voice disorders underwent voice and respiratory function assessments. Respiratory variables, including percent vital capacity (%VC), forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV₁/FVC), maximum inspiratory pressure (PImax), maximum expiratory pressure (PEmax), and inspiratory and expiratory Mean Sustained Pressure Index (MSPI), were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) to derive a Respiratory Muscle Performance Factor (RMPF), a composite factor reflecting maximal pressure-generating capacity and sustained pressure performance. Differences in RMPF across etiologic categories (organic, neurological, and functional voice disorders) were examined using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlling for age and sex. Associations between RMPF and phonatory measures, including MPT and cepstral peak prominence (CPP) derived from sustained vowels and connected speech, were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients within each etiologic category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RMPF differed significantly across diagnostic categories (P = 0.004), with the organic voice disorder group demonstrating significantly higher values than the functional voice disorder group. No significant effects of age or sex were observed. In the organic and neurological voice disorder groups, RMPF showed significant positive correlations with MPT. In contrast, in the functional voice disorder group, RMPF showed a significant positive correlation with CPP derived from the connected-speech sentence \"waɾanojanenoieda.\" No significant associations were observed between RMPF and the remaining cepstral measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Respiratory muscle performance differs across etiologic categories of voice disorders and demonstrates diagnosis-specific associations with phonatory measures. Functional voice disorders were characterized by an association between respiratory function and connected-speech phonatory stability, whereas organic and neurological voice disorders demonstrated associations with phonatory duration. These findings suggest that disease-specific respiratory-phonatory interactions may contribute to differences in voice production and phonatory performance across voice disorder populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2026.09.022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether a data-driven composite factor reflecting respiratory pressure-generating capacity and sustained pressure performance differs across etiologic categories of voice disorders and to examine its associations with maximum phonation time (MPT) and cepstral measures of phonatory stability.

Study design: Prospective observational study.

Methods: Forty-three patients with voice disorders underwent voice and respiratory function assessments. Respiratory variables, including percent vital capacity (%VC), forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV₁/FVC), maximum inspiratory pressure (PImax), maximum expiratory pressure (PEmax), and inspiratory and expiratory Mean Sustained Pressure Index (MSPI), were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) to derive a Respiratory Muscle Performance Factor (RMPF), a composite factor reflecting maximal pressure-generating capacity and sustained pressure performance. Differences in RMPF across etiologic categories (organic, neurological, and functional voice disorders) were examined using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlling for age and sex. Associations between RMPF and phonatory measures, including MPT and cepstral peak prominence (CPP) derived from sustained vowels and connected speech, were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients within each etiologic category.

Results: RMPF differed significantly across diagnostic categories (P = 0.004), with the organic voice disorder group demonstrating significantly higher values than the functional voice disorder group. No significant effects of age or sex were observed. In the organic and neurological voice disorder groups, RMPF showed significant positive correlations with MPT. In contrast, in the functional voice disorder group, RMPF showed a significant positive correlation with CPP derived from the connected-speech sentence "waɾanojanenoieda." No significant associations were observed between RMPF and the remaining cepstral measures.

Conclusions: Respiratory muscle performance differs across etiologic categories of voice disorders and demonstrates diagnosis-specific associations with phonatory measures. Functional voice disorders were characterized by an association between respiratory function and connected-speech phonatory stability, whereas organic and neurological voice disorders demonstrated associations with phonatory duration. These findings suggest that disease-specific respiratory-phonatory interactions may contribute to differences in voice production and phonatory performance across voice disorder populations.

呼吸压力和声音障碍病因分类的持续表现:一项初步研究。
目的:确定反映呼吸压力产生能力和持续压力表现的数据驱动的复合因子是否在不同病因类型的声音障碍中有所不同,并检查其与最大发声时间(MPT)和发音稳定性的倒谱测量的关系。研究设计:前瞻性观察性研究。方法:对43例嗓音障碍患者进行嗓音和呼吸功能评估。呼吸变量包括肺活量百分比(%VC)、一秒钟用力呼气量与用力肺活量比(FEV 1 /FVC)、最大吸气压力(PImax)、最大呼气压力(PEmax)以及吸气和呼气平均持续压力指数(MSPI),采用主成分分析(PCA)得出呼吸肌性能因子(RMPF)。反映最大压力产生能力和持续压力表现的复合因子。使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)对不同病因类别(器质性、神经性和功能性语音障碍)的RMPF差异进行了检查,并控制了年龄和性别。RMPF与语音测量之间的关系,包括MPT和由持续元音和连音衍生的倒谱峰突出(CPP),在每个病因分类中使用Spearman等级相关系数进行分析。结果:不同诊断类别的RMPF差异显著(P = 0.004),器质性语音障碍组的RMPF值显著高于功能性语音障碍组。没有观察到年龄或性别的显著影响。在器质性和神经性语音障碍组中,RMPF与MPT呈显著正相关。相比之下,在功能性语音障碍组中,RMPF与连接语音句子“wa * anojanenoieda”衍生的CPP呈显著正相关。在RMPF和余下的倒侧测量之间没有观察到显著的关联。结论:呼吸肌表现在不同病因类型的声音障碍中有所不同,并与发声测量显示诊断特异性关联。功能性语音障碍的特征是呼吸功能与连接语音发声稳定性之间的关联,而器质性和神经性语音障碍则与发声持续时间有关。这些发现表明,疾病特异性的呼吸-发声相互作用可能导致发声障碍人群在发声和发声表现方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书