Comparing semantic and phonetic similarities between Turkish and Japanese onomatopoeia.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Defne Akkuş, Fatma Nefes Tekin, Dicle Dövencioğlu
{"title":"Comparing semantic and phonetic similarities between Turkish and Japanese onomatopoeia.","authors":"Defne Akkuş, Fatma Nefes Tekin, Dicle Dövencioğlu","doi":"10.1007/s10339-026-01394-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sound symbolism research reveals a non-arbitrary relationship between phonetics and meaning, demonstrating strong associations between consonant sounds and perceived shape, size, or material. Onomatopoeias, a subset of sound-symbolic expressions, directly imitate the sound they describe. Previous evidence suggests that onomatopoeias encode sound-symbolic cues, even across unfamiliar languages, but no specific research has been done specifically on material-related sound symbolism. To examine how the phonetic and semantic features of onomatopoeic words influence material perception, we conducted a semantic differentiation task with Turkish-speaking participants (N = 28) unfamiliar with Japanese. Stimuli consisted of three-word sets: 14 Turkish words, 14 semantically similar Japanese words, and 14 phonetically similar Japanese words. For example, the Turkish word mır mır (a humming sound) shares a similar meaning with the Japanese word hiso hiso (speaking in a low or hushed tone), and shows phonetic similarity to the Japanese word miri miri (slowly tearing or stretching something tightly). Participants rated each word on seven adjective pairs: (1) flat-bumpy, (2) warm-cold, (3) wet-dry, (4) light-heavy, (5) smooth-rough, (6) slippery-sticky, and (7) granular-whole. Equivalence testing further indicated that phonetically similar pairs more frequently fell within predefined equivalence bounds and showed smaller deviations across adjective dimensions. Multidimensional scaling additionally revealed smaller perceptual distances between Turkish words and their phonetically similar Japanese counterparts. Together, these findings suggest that phonetic similarity contributes more strongly than semantic similarity to cross-linguistic material-related judgements. Furthermore, the results highlight distinctive sound patterns shared by Japanese and Turkish onomatopoeias, suggesting the existence of universal phonetic markers for material-related sound symbolism.</p>","PeriodicalId":47638,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Processing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Processing","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-026-01394-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sound symbolism research reveals a non-arbitrary relationship between phonetics and meaning, demonstrating strong associations between consonant sounds and perceived shape, size, or material. Onomatopoeias, a subset of sound-symbolic expressions, directly imitate the sound they describe. Previous evidence suggests that onomatopoeias encode sound-symbolic cues, even across unfamiliar languages, but no specific research has been done specifically on material-related sound symbolism. To examine how the phonetic and semantic features of onomatopoeic words influence material perception, we conducted a semantic differentiation task with Turkish-speaking participants (N = 28) unfamiliar with Japanese. Stimuli consisted of three-word sets: 14 Turkish words, 14 semantically similar Japanese words, and 14 phonetically similar Japanese words. For example, the Turkish word mır mır (a humming sound) shares a similar meaning with the Japanese word hiso hiso (speaking in a low or hushed tone), and shows phonetic similarity to the Japanese word miri miri (slowly tearing or stretching something tightly). Participants rated each word on seven adjective pairs: (1) flat-bumpy, (2) warm-cold, (3) wet-dry, (4) light-heavy, (5) smooth-rough, (6) slippery-sticky, and (7) granular-whole. Equivalence testing further indicated that phonetically similar pairs more frequently fell within predefined equivalence bounds and showed smaller deviations across adjective dimensions. Multidimensional scaling additionally revealed smaller perceptual distances between Turkish words and their phonetically similar Japanese counterparts. Together, these findings suggest that phonetic similarity contributes more strongly than semantic similarity to cross-linguistic material-related judgements. Furthermore, the results highlight distinctive sound patterns shared by Japanese and Turkish onomatopoeias, suggesting the existence of universal phonetic markers for material-related sound symbolism.

比较土耳其语和日语拟声词的语义和语音相似性。
声音象征主义研究揭示了语音和意义之间的非任意关系,证明了辅音声音和感知到的形状、大小或材料之间的强烈联系。拟声词是声音符号表达的一个子集,直接模仿它们所描述的声音。先前的证据表明,拟声词对声音符号线索进行编码,甚至在不熟悉的语言中也是如此,但没有专门针对与物质相关的声音符号进行过具体的研究。为了研究拟声词的语音和语义特征如何影响材料感知,我们对不熟悉日语的土耳其语参与者(N = 28)进行了语义区分任务。刺激包括三个词集:14个土耳其词,14个语义相似的日语词和14个语音相似的日语词。例如,土耳其语单词mır mır(一种嗡嗡的声音)与日语单词hiso hiso(低声或安静地说话)有相似的意思,并且与日语单词miri miri(慢慢地撕裂或紧紧地拉伸某物)有相似的语音。参与者用七个形容词组合来给每个单词打分:(1)平坦-颠簸,(2)温暖-寒冷,(3)干湿,(4)轻-重,(5)光滑-粗糙,(6)滑-粘,(7)颗粒-整体。等效性测试进一步表明,语音相似对更频繁地落在预定义的等效范围内,并且在形容词维度上表现出较小的偏差。多维尺度还显示,土耳其语单词与发音相似的日语单词之间的感知距离较小。总之,这些发现表明语音相似性比语义相似性对跨语言材料相关判断的贡献更大。此外,研究结果突出了日语和土耳其语拟声词所共有的独特声音模式,表明存在与物质相关的声音象征主义的通用语音标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Processing
Cognitive Processing PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Cognitive Processing - International Quarterly of Cognitive Science is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes innovative contributions in the multidisciplinary field of cognitive science.  Its main purpose is to stimulate research and scientific interaction through communication between specialists in different fields on topics of common interest and to promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary cognitive science. Cognitive Processing is articulated in the following sections:Cognitive DevelopmentCognitive Models of Risk and Decision MakingCognitive NeuroscienceCognitive PsychologyComputational Cognitive SciencesPhilosophy of MindNeuroimaging and Electrophysiological MethodsPsycholinguistics and Computational linguisticsQuantitative Psychology and Formal Theories in Cognitive ScienceSocial Cognition and Cognitive Science of Culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书