The Effectiveness of Digital Psycho-Oncology Interventions on Anxiety and Depression in Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.4 Q2 NURSING
Ilany Nandia Chandra, Mohamad Rusdiansyah, Anya Bunga Fakhriyah, Putri Annelydia, Suci Wahyu Hariyanto, Ayyu Sandhi, Melyza Perdana
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Digital Psycho-Oncology Interventions on Anxiety and Depression in Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ilany Nandia Chandra, Mohamad Rusdiansyah, Anya Bunga Fakhriyah, Putri Annelydia, Suci Wahyu Hariyanto, Ayyu Sandhi, Melyza Perdana","doi":"10.1177/08445621261491462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCancer survivors frequently experience anxiety and depression, which can impair quality of life. Digital psycho-oncology interventions represent a promising strategy to address these psychosocial concerns.AimThis systematic review evaluated the types of digital psycho-oncology interventions for cancer survivors and summarized their efficacy in reducing anxiety and depression.MethodsThis systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251240232). Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, PsycNET, and CINAHL for articles published between 2015 and 2025. Eligible studies evaluated digital psycho-oncology interventions for cancer survivors and assessed anxiety and/or depression. Methodological quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools, and findings were synthesized descriptively.ResultsOf 720 identified records, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Web-based platforms were the most common delivery modality, followed by mobile applications. Interventions were generally multicomponent, most often combining psychoeducation and social/psychological support, and ranged in duration from 4 weeks to 12 months. Anxiety was assessed in 7 studies, all of which reported significant reductions. Depression was assessed in 10 studies; 5 reported significant improvement, whereas 5 found non-significant effects.ConclusionsDigital psycho-oncology interventions appear promising for improving psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivors, particularly anxiety. However, evidence for depression remains mixed. Future research should prioritize larger, methodologically robust trials with standardized outcomes and longer follow-up to address current heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":46661,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"8445621261491462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08445621261491462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundCancer survivors frequently experience anxiety and depression, which can impair quality of life. Digital psycho-oncology interventions represent a promising strategy to address these psychosocial concerns.AimThis systematic review evaluated the types of digital psycho-oncology interventions for cancer survivors and summarized their efficacy in reducing anxiety and depression.MethodsThis systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251240232). Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, PsycNET, and CINAHL for articles published between 2015 and 2025. Eligible studies evaluated digital psycho-oncology interventions for cancer survivors and assessed anxiety and/or depression. Methodological quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools, and findings were synthesized descriptively.ResultsOf 720 identified records, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. Web-based platforms were the most common delivery modality, followed by mobile applications. Interventions were generally multicomponent, most often combining psychoeducation and social/psychological support, and ranged in duration from 4 weeks to 12 months. Anxiety was assessed in 7 studies, all of which reported significant reductions. Depression was assessed in 10 studies; 5 reported significant improvement, whereas 5 found non-significant effects.ConclusionsDigital psycho-oncology interventions appear promising for improving psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivors, particularly anxiety. However, evidence for depression remains mixed. Future research should prioritize larger, methodologically robust trials with standardized outcomes and longer follow-up to address current heterogeneity.

数字心理肿瘤学干预对癌症幸存者焦虑和抑郁的有效性:系统综述。
癌症幸存者经常经历焦虑和抑郁,这会影响他们的生活质量。数字心理肿瘤学干预是解决这些社会心理问题的一种有希望的策略。目的评价数字化心理肿瘤学干预对癌症幸存者的影响,总结其在减轻焦虑和抑郁方面的效果。方法本系统综述遵循PRISMA指南,在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251240232)。在PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, PsycNET和CINAHL中检索了2015年至2025年间发表的文章。符合条件的研究评估了癌症幸存者的数字心理肿瘤学干预措施,并评估了焦虑和/或抑郁。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的工具评估方法学质量,并对研究结果进行描述性综合。结果在720份确定的记录中,有11项研究符合纳入标准。基于网络的平台是最常见的交付方式,其次是移动应用程序。干预措施通常是多成分的,最常结合心理教育和社会/心理支持,持续时间从4周到12个月不等。在7项研究中评估了焦虑,所有研究都报告了显著的减少。在10项研究中评估了抑郁症;5个报告有显著改善,而5个发现无显著影响。结论:数字心理肿瘤学干预有望改善癌症幸存者的社会心理结果,特别是焦虑。然而,抑郁症的证据仍然是混杂的。未来的研究应优先考虑规模更大、方法学更强、结果标准化、随访时间更长的试验,以解决当前的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: We are pleased to announce the launch of the CJNR digital archive, an online archive available through the McGill University Library, and hosted by the McGill University Library Digital Collections Program in perpetuity. This archive has been made possible through a Richard M. Tomlinson Digital Library Innovation and Access Award to the McGill School of Nursing. The Richard M. Tomlinson award recognizes the ongoing contribution and commitment the CJNR has made to the McGill School of Nursing, and to the development and nursing science in Canada and worldwide. We hope this archive proves to be an invaluable research tool for researchers in Nursing and other faculties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书