Symptom Networks, Developmental Pathways, and Intervention Evidence for Co-occurring Anxiety and Depression in Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Rui Hu, Xuanyuan Chen
{"title":"Symptom Networks, Developmental Pathways, and Intervention Evidence for Co-occurring Anxiety and Depression in Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Rui Hu, Xuanyuan Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10802-026-01508-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anxiety and depression frequently co-occur in children and adolescents, but studies of their joint presentation use different units of analysis. This scoping review examined how those approaches connect and where evidence remains limited. We searched PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and APA PsycINFO for English-language studies available from 2010 to 11 May 2026. We mapped 205 eligible studies across eight non-exclusive empirical themes and interpreted their distribution from a developmental perspective. Study designs varied with the constructs examined. Among 52 symptom-network studies, 37 analysed cross-sectional data and 15 used longitudinal or trajectory cohort designs. Only 16 of 170 risk-factor studies also evaluated treatment outcomes. One symptom-network study linked network-derived findings to a neurobiological measure. Developmental and geographical coverage was uneven. Three studies were child-focused, and the United States and China accounted for 69.27% of the evidence. The descriptive Global South aggregate accounted for 5.85%. These patterns identify priorities for longitudinal within-person research, developmental stratification, and studies linking symptom models to biological measures and intervention mechanisms. Locally validated measures and research in underrepresented settings are needed to assess whether findings transfer across populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36218,"journal":{"name":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","volume":"54 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13619781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-026-01508-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anxiety and depression frequently co-occur in children and adolescents, but studies of their joint presentation use different units of analysis. This scoping review examined how those approaches connect and where evidence remains limited. We searched PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and APA PsycINFO for English-language studies available from 2010 to 11 May 2026. We mapped 205 eligible studies across eight non-exclusive empirical themes and interpreted their distribution from a developmental perspective. Study designs varied with the constructs examined. Among 52 symptom-network studies, 37 analysed cross-sectional data and 15 used longitudinal or trajectory cohort designs. Only 16 of 170 risk-factor studies also evaluated treatment outcomes. One symptom-network study linked network-derived findings to a neurobiological measure. Developmental and geographical coverage was uneven. Three studies were child-focused, and the United States and China accounted for 69.27% of the evidence. The descriptive Global South aggregate accounted for 5.85%. These patterns identify priorities for longitudinal within-person research, developmental stratification, and studies linking symptom models to biological measures and intervention mechanisms. Locally validated measures and research in underrepresented settings are needed to assess whether findings transfer across populations.

儿童和青少年共发焦虑和抑郁的症状网络、发展途径和干预证据:范围综述。
焦虑和抑郁经常在儿童和青少年中同时发生,但对它们共同表现的研究使用了不同的分析单位。这项范围审查审查了这些方法之间的联系以及证据仍然有限的地方。我们检索了PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus和APA PsycINFO从2010年到2026年5月11日的英语研究。我们在8个非排他性的经验主题中绘制了205个符合条件的研究,并从发展的角度解释了它们的分布。研究设计因所检查的结构而异。在52项症状网络研究中,37项分析了横断面数据,15项采用纵向或轨迹队列设计。170项风险因素研究中只有16项也评估了治疗结果。一项症状网络研究将网络衍生的发现与神经生物学测量联系起来。发展和地理覆盖不均衡。三项研究以儿童为中心,美国和中国占了69.27%的证据。描述性的全球南方合计占5.85%。这些模式确定了纵向个人研究、发育分层以及将症状模型与生物措施和干预机制联系起来的研究的优先事项。需要在代表性不足的环境中进行当地验证的措施和研究,以评估研究结果是否在人群中转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology Psychology-Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书