Picture versus word: Moderator effects on age-related differences in false memories depend on stimulus type.

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Minyu Chang, Nathaniel R Greene, Charles Brainerd, Ciaran Williams, Xiomara Diosdado, Shanze Kirmani
{"title":"Picture versus word: Moderator effects on age-related differences in false memories depend on stimulus type.","authors":"Minyu Chang, Nathaniel R Greene, Charles Brainerd, Ciaran Williams, Xiomara Diosdado, Shanze Kirmani","doi":"10.1037/pag0001032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A recent meta-analysis by Huan et al. (2026) revealed that the aging increase in false memory was significantly influenced by some moderators (e.g., stimulus type, paradigm, and retention interval) but not others (e.g., test format and list length). The present study reanalyzed the data reported by Huan et al. using a series of new moderator analyses, which were motivated by the facts that some moderator effects reported by Huan et al. are (a) inconsistent with the prior literature and (b) potentially confounded with stimulus type (pictures vs. words). Whereas the earlier meta-analysis relied on univariate meta-regressions, we conducted multivariable meta-regressions and subgroup analyses to reexamine the moderators of interest after controlling for stimulus type. Our results showed that the effects of multiple moderators depend on stimulus type: The moderating effects of paradigm and retention interval were nonsignificant when stimulus type was controlled, whereas the moderating effects of test format and list length were significant with word stimuli but not with picture stimuli. These findings highlight the importance of treating picture and word stimuli differently when studying developmental trends in false memory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0001032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A recent meta-analysis by Huan et al. (2026) revealed that the aging increase in false memory was significantly influenced by some moderators (e.g., stimulus type, paradigm, and retention interval) but not others (e.g., test format and list length). The present study reanalyzed the data reported by Huan et al. using a series of new moderator analyses, which were motivated by the facts that some moderator effects reported by Huan et al. are (a) inconsistent with the prior literature and (b) potentially confounded with stimulus type (pictures vs. words). Whereas the earlier meta-analysis relied on univariate meta-regressions, we conducted multivariable meta-regressions and subgroup analyses to reexamine the moderators of interest after controlling for stimulus type. Our results showed that the effects of multiple moderators depend on stimulus type: The moderating effects of paradigm and retention interval were nonsignificant when stimulus type was controlled, whereas the moderating effects of test format and list length were significant with word stimuli but not with picture stimuli. These findings highlight the importance of treating picture and word stimuli differently when studying developmental trends in false memory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

图片与文字:对错误记忆的年龄相关差异的调节作用取决于刺激类型。
Huan等人(2026)最近的一项荟萃分析显示,错误记忆的老化增加受到一些调节因子(如刺激类型、范式和保留间隔)的显著影响,而其他调节因子(如测试格式和列表长度)则不受影响。本研究使用一系列新的调节因子分析对Huan等人报道的数据进行了重新分析,其动机是Huan等人报道的一些调节效应(a)与先前的文献不一致,(b)可能与刺激类型(图片与文字)混淆。而早期的元分析依赖于单变量元回归,我们进行了多变量元回归和亚组分析,在控制刺激类型后重新检查兴趣调节因子。结果表明,多种调节因子的调节作用依赖于刺激类型:在控制刺激类型时,范式和保留间隔的调节作用不显著,而测试格式和列表长度的调节作用在单词刺激下显著,在图片刺激下不显著。这些发现强调了在研究错误记忆的发展趋势时,区别对待图片和文字刺激的重要性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.80%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书