Adjunctive screening and risk stratification performance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
{"title":"Adjunctive screening and risk stratification performance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ling Chen, Wei Hu, Fei Zhao, Qian Pan, Chunhong Li, Xiangyuan Ju, Rennan Yao","doi":"10.17305/bb.2026.14713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an inexpensive inflammatory marker with uncertain value for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk assessment. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated NLR for first-trimester risk stratification and second-trimester adjunctive screening of GDM. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to April 15, 2026. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled separately by trimester, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were fitted using the Moses-Littenberg method. Eleven studies comprising 12 independent datasets used the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) as the reference standard. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were 0.702 (0.660-0.742), 0.426 (0.401-0.452), and 0.694 (0.559-0.828), respectively, in the first trimester and 0.665 (0.632-0.697), 0.644 (0.618-0.670), and 0.798 (0.723-0.873) in the second trimester. At cutoffs ≤ 3.0, exploratory AUC estimates were 0.845 and 0.850, respectively, but subgroup differences were not formally tested. All studies were at high risk of index-test bias from post hoc threshold selection, seven used case-control designs, and heterogeneity was substantial. NLR may have an adjunctive role in GDM risk assessment but should not replace OGTT or serve as a standalone screening test. No clinical cutoff can be recommended; prospective studies with prespecified thresholds and independent validation cohorts are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":72398,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17305/bb.2026.14713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an inexpensive inflammatory marker with uncertain value for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk assessment. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated NLR for first-trimester risk stratification and second-trimester adjunctive screening of GDM. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to April 15, 2026. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled separately by trimester, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were fitted using the Moses-Littenberg method. Eleven studies comprising 12 independent datasets used the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) as the reference standard. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were 0.702 (0.660-0.742), 0.426 (0.401-0.452), and 0.694 (0.559-0.828), respectively, in the first trimester and 0.665 (0.632-0.697), 0.644 (0.618-0.670), and 0.798 (0.723-0.873) in the second trimester. At cutoffs ≤ 3.0, exploratory AUC estimates were 0.845 and 0.850, respectively, but subgroup differences were not formally tested. All studies were at high risk of index-test bias from post hoc threshold selection, seven used case-control designs, and heterogeneity was substantial. NLR may have an adjunctive role in GDM risk assessment but should not replace OGTT or serve as a standalone screening test. No clinical cutoff can be recommended; prospective studies with prespecified thresholds and independent validation cohorts are required.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)是一种廉价的炎症标志物,但对妊娠糖尿病(GDM)风险评估的价值尚不确定。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了NLR在妊娠早期风险分层和妊娠中期辅助筛查GDM中的作用。PubMed, Embase, Web of Science和Cochrane Library从成立到2026年4月15日进行了检索。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2 (QUADAS-2)工具评估偏倚风险。敏感度和特异度按妊娠期分别汇总,采用Moses-Littenberg方法拟合总体受试者工作特征曲线。11项研究包括12个独立数据集,使用口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)作为参考标准。早期妊娠的合并敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.702(0.660-0.742)、0.426(0.401-0.452)和0.694(0.559-0.828),中期妊娠的合并敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)的95%可信区间分别为0.665(0.632-0.697)、0.644(0.618-0.670)和0.798(0.723-0.873)。在截断点≤3.0时,探索性AUC估计分别为0.845和0.850,但未正式检验亚组差异。所有的研究在事后阈值选择中都有很高的指数检验偏倚风险,7个研究使用病例对照设计,异质性很大。NLR可能在GDM风险评估中起到辅助作用,但不应取代OGTT或作为单独的筛查试验。不建议临床切断;需要预先设定阈值和独立验证队列的前瞻性研究。