Ali Talyshinskii, María Florencia Frascheri, Lazaros Tzelves, Andreas Skolarikos, Robert Geraghty, Niall F Davis, Bhaskar Kumar Somani
{"title":"Changes in renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease after ureteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis from EAU endourology.","authors":"Ali Talyshinskii, María Florencia Frascheri, Lazaros Tzelves, Andreas Skolarikos, Robert Geraghty, Niall F Davis, Bhaskar Kumar Somani","doi":"10.1007/s00240-026-02067-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of ureteroscopy (URS) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) on renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear, particularly given concerns regarding intrarenal pressure and repeated interventions. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) following URS or RIRS in patients with pre-existing CKD. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (2025). Databases were searched in March 2026. Studies reporting pre- and postoperative eGFR in patients with established CKD or cohorts including patients with reduced baseline renal function undergoing standard URS or RIRS were included. A random-effects model (REML with Knapp-Hartung adjustment) was used to calculate pooled mean differences (MD) in eGFR. Seven studies including 742 patients met inclusion criteria. Follow-up ranged from 1 month to over 2 years. The pooled mean difference in eGFR was +2.8 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI -2.8 to +8.4; p = 0.27), indicating no significant overall change in renal function, with substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 89.6%). A greater increase in eGFR was observed in the ureteral stone subgroup (MD +12.26 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>; 95% CI 9.03-15.49); however, this estimate was derived from a single study and should be interpreted cautiously. No study reported progression to dialysis attributable to ureteroscopic intervention. Evidence certainty remains very low, highlighting the need for prospective studies with standardized long-term assessment. Available evidence does not suggest a clinically meaningful deterioration in renal function following URS or RIRS and indicates that renal function may improve in selected patients after relief of obstruction; however, these findings are based on very low-certainty evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-026-02067-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The impact of ureteroscopy (URS) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) on renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear, particularly given concerns regarding intrarenal pressure and repeated interventions. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) following URS or RIRS in patients with pre-existing CKD. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (2025). Databases were searched in March 2026. Studies reporting pre- and postoperative eGFR in patients with established CKD or cohorts including patients with reduced baseline renal function undergoing standard URS or RIRS were included. A random-effects model (REML with Knapp-Hartung adjustment) was used to calculate pooled mean differences (MD) in eGFR. Seven studies including 742 patients met inclusion criteria. Follow-up ranged from 1 month to over 2 years. The pooled mean difference in eGFR was +2.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI -2.8 to +8.4; p = 0.27), indicating no significant overall change in renal function, with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 89.6%). A greater increase in eGFR was observed in the ureteral stone subgroup (MD +12.26 mL/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI 9.03-15.49); however, this estimate was derived from a single study and should be interpreted cautiously. No study reported progression to dialysis attributable to ureteroscopic intervention. Evidence certainty remains very low, highlighting the need for prospective studies with standardized long-term assessment. Available evidence does not suggest a clinically meaningful deterioration in renal function following URS or RIRS and indicates that renal function may improve in selected patients after relief of obstruction; however, these findings are based on very low-certainty evidence.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society
The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field.
Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.