Changes in renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease after ureteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis from EAU endourology.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ali Talyshinskii, María Florencia Frascheri, Lazaros Tzelves, Andreas Skolarikos, Robert Geraghty, Niall F Davis, Bhaskar Kumar Somani
{"title":"Changes in renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease after ureteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis from EAU endourology.","authors":"Ali Talyshinskii, María Florencia Frascheri, Lazaros Tzelves, Andreas Skolarikos, Robert Geraghty, Niall F Davis, Bhaskar Kumar Somani","doi":"10.1007/s00240-026-02067-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of ureteroscopy (URS) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) on renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear, particularly given concerns regarding intrarenal pressure and repeated interventions. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) following URS or RIRS in patients with pre-existing CKD. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (2025). Databases were searched in March 2026. Studies reporting pre- and postoperative eGFR in patients with established CKD or cohorts including patients with reduced baseline renal function undergoing standard URS or RIRS were included. A random-effects model (REML with Knapp-Hartung adjustment) was used to calculate pooled mean differences (MD) in eGFR. Seven studies including 742 patients met inclusion criteria. Follow-up ranged from 1 month to over 2 years. The pooled mean difference in eGFR was +2.8 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI -2.8 to +8.4; p = 0.27), indicating no significant overall change in renal function, with substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 89.6%). A greater increase in eGFR was observed in the ureteral stone subgroup (MD +12.26 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>; 95% CI 9.03-15.49); however, this estimate was derived from a single study and should be interpreted cautiously. No study reported progression to dialysis attributable to ureteroscopic intervention. Evidence certainty remains very low, highlighting the need for prospective studies with standardized long-term assessment. Available evidence does not suggest a clinically meaningful deterioration in renal function following URS or RIRS and indicates that renal function may improve in selected patients after relief of obstruction; however, these findings are based on very low-certainty evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-026-02067-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of ureteroscopy (URS) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) on renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear, particularly given concerns regarding intrarenal pressure and repeated interventions. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) following URS or RIRS in patients with pre-existing CKD. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (2025). Databases were searched in March 2026. Studies reporting pre- and postoperative eGFR in patients with established CKD or cohorts including patients with reduced baseline renal function undergoing standard URS or RIRS were included. A random-effects model (REML with Knapp-Hartung adjustment) was used to calculate pooled mean differences (MD) in eGFR. Seven studies including 742 patients met inclusion criteria. Follow-up ranged from 1 month to over 2 years. The pooled mean difference in eGFR was +2.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI -2.8 to +8.4; p = 0.27), indicating no significant overall change in renal function, with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 89.6%). A greater increase in eGFR was observed in the ureteral stone subgroup (MD +12.26 mL/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI 9.03-15.49); however, this estimate was derived from a single study and should be interpreted cautiously. No study reported progression to dialysis attributable to ureteroscopic intervention. Evidence certainty remains very low, highlighting the need for prospective studies with standardized long-term assessment. Available evidence does not suggest a clinically meaningful deterioration in renal function following URS or RIRS and indicates that renal function may improve in selected patients after relief of obstruction; however, these findings are based on very low-certainty evidence.

输尿管镜检查后慢性肾脏病患者肾功能的改变:一项来自EAU泌尿外科的系统综述和荟萃分析
输尿管镜检查(URS)和逆行肾内手术(RIRS)对慢性肾病(CKD)患者肾功能的影响尚不清楚,特别是考虑到肾内压和反复干预。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估预先存在的CKD患者在URS或RIRS后估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的变化。根据PRISMA指南进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,并在PROSPERO(2025)中注册。数据库于2026年3月进行了搜索。研究报告了确诊CKD患者的术前和术后eGFR,或包括基线肾功能降低的患者接受标准URS或RIRS的队列。采用随机效应模型(带Knapp-Hartung调整的REML)计算eGFR的汇总平均差异(MD)。包括742例患者的7项研究符合纳入标准。随访1个月至2年以上。eGFR的合并平均差异为+2.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI -2.8至+8.4;p = 0.27),表明肾功能总体无显著变化,存在显著异质性(I2 = 89.6%)。输尿管结石亚组eGFR升高更明显(MD +12.26 mL/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI 9.03-15.49);然而,这一估计来自单一研究,应谨慎解释。没有研究报告由于输尿管镜干预导致透析进展。证据确定性仍然很低,这突出表明需要进行具有标准化长期评估的前瞻性研究。现有证据并未显示尿潴留或尿潴留会导致临床上有意义的肾功能恶化,并表明在梗阻缓解后,部分患者的肾功能可能有所改善;然而,这些发现是基于非常不确定的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书