Motives and Sources for Prescription Opioid Misuse Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Criminal Justice System Contact.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Jason A Ford, Thomas Jones, Brady T West, Philip T Veliz, Sean Esteban McCabe, Ty S Schepis
{"title":"Motives and Sources for Prescription Opioid Misuse Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Criminal Justice System Contact.","authors":"Jason A Ford, Thomas Jones, Brady T West, Philip T Veliz, Sean Esteban McCabe, Ty S Schepis","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2026.2734263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study addresses a gap in literature by examining associations between criminal justice system contact (i.e., arrest, probation, parole) and prescription opioid misuse motives and sources among adolescents and young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2015-2019) were analyzed. Respondents reporting past-year prescription opioid misuse completed follow-up questions on motives (e.g., pain relief, relaxation/sleep, recreational) and sources (e.g., doctor, free from friend/relative, purchased, theft). Motives and sources were modeled as a function of criminal justice system contact and relevant covariates, separately by age group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multinomial logistic regression revealed significant differences by criminal justice contact. Both adolescents and young adults with criminal justice system contact were more likely to report recreational or sleep/relaxation motives compared to pain relief. Among young adults, criminal justice system contact was associated with greater likelihood of obtaining opioids for free, through purchase, or by theft rather than from a doctor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The elevated likelihood of endorsing riskier motives and sources identifies adolescents and young adults with criminal justice system contact as a high-need population for targeted substance use programming. A multidimensional framework addressing the intersection of crime and health is essential to reducing disparities and criminal involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2026.2734263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study addresses a gap in literature by examining associations between criminal justice system contact (i.e., arrest, probation, parole) and prescription opioid misuse motives and sources among adolescents and young adults.

Methods: Data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2015-2019) were analyzed. Respondents reporting past-year prescription opioid misuse completed follow-up questions on motives (e.g., pain relief, relaxation/sleep, recreational) and sources (e.g., doctor, free from friend/relative, purchased, theft). Motives and sources were modeled as a function of criminal justice system contact and relevant covariates, separately by age group.

Results: Multinomial logistic regression revealed significant differences by criminal justice contact. Both adolescents and young adults with criminal justice system contact were more likely to report recreational or sleep/relaxation motives compared to pain relief. Among young adults, criminal justice system contact was associated with greater likelihood of obtaining opioids for free, through purchase, or by theft rather than from a doctor.

Conclusions: The elevated likelihood of endorsing riskier motives and sources identifies adolescents and young adults with criminal justice system contact as a high-need population for targeted substance use programming. A multidimensional framework addressing the intersection of crime and health is essential to reducing disparities and criminal involvement.

与刑事司法系统接触的青少年和年轻人滥用处方阿片类药物的动机和来源。
背景:本研究通过研究青少年和年轻人中刑事司法系统接触(即逮捕、缓刑、假释)与处方阿片类药物滥用动机和来源之间的关系,解决了文献中的空白。方法:对2015-2019年全国药物使用与健康调查数据进行分析。报告过去一年处方阿片类药物滥用的应答者完成了关于动机(例如,缓解疼痛、放松/睡眠、娱乐)和来源(例如,医生、不受朋友/亲戚影响、购买、盗窃)的随访问题。动机和来源被建模为刑事司法系统接触和相关协变量的函数,分别按年龄组。结果:多项逻辑回归显示刑事司法接触差异显著。与缓解疼痛相比,与刑事司法系统有联系的青少年和年轻人更有可能报告娱乐或睡眠/放松的动机。在年轻人中,接触刑事司法系统与更有可能通过免费、购买或盗窃而不是从医生那里获得阿片类药物有关。结论:支持更危险动机和来源的可能性增加,将与刑事司法系统接触的青少年和年轻人确定为目标物质使用规划的高需求人群。一个处理犯罪与健康交叉问题的多维框架对于减少差距和犯罪参与至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书