Diagnosis-based laboratory information system flags to support specialized transfusion protocols in sickle cell disease.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2026-09-29 DOI:10.1111/trf.70417
Caroline G Stanek, Ronald G Hauser, Katherine Madden, Bhushan Shah, Christopher A Tormey, Kerry Wallack, Nalan Yurtsever
{"title":"Diagnosis-based laboratory information system flags to support specialized transfusion protocols in sickle cell disease.","authors":"Caroline G Stanek, Ronald G Hauser, Katherine Madden, Bhushan Shah, Christopher A Tormey, Kerry Wallack, Nalan Yurtsever","doi":"10.1111/trf.70417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) frequently require specialized transfusion support. However, the blood bank cannot readily identify these patients without a time-prohibitive chart review. To improve adherence to evidence-based practices involving the transfusion of patients with SCD, we developed a laboratory information system (LIS)-integrated flagging system.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Using a predefined set of SCD-related International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnosis codes, laboratory-facing flags were implemented within the LIS. Flags were displayed in multiple workflow locations, including the patient dashboard, blood bank specimen receiving interface, and blood bank outstanding work list.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Blood bank technologists used the flags to verify and apply the institution's existing sickle cell transfusion protocol within the blood bank information system (BBIS). Thirty-three new patients with confirmed SCD but without historical comment in the BBIS had a type and screen performed after the implementation of the flag. Upon review, 4 (12%) did not have SCD-related diagnosis in their problem list and therefore lacked the trigger for the flag. Twenty-nine (88%) patients had the diagnosis in the problem list and all of them (100%) correctly displayed the flag.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The intervention provided additional alerts of patients with SCD across multiple laboratory workflows and aided in the recognition of eligible patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) frequently require specialized transfusion support. However, the blood bank cannot readily identify these patients without a time-prohibitive chart review. To improve adherence to evidence-based practices involving the transfusion of patients with SCD, we developed a laboratory information system (LIS)-integrated flagging system.

Study design and methods: Using a predefined set of SCD-related International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnosis codes, laboratory-facing flags were implemented within the LIS. Flags were displayed in multiple workflow locations, including the patient dashboard, blood bank specimen receiving interface, and blood bank outstanding work list.

Results: Blood bank technologists used the flags to verify and apply the institution's existing sickle cell transfusion protocol within the blood bank information system (BBIS). Thirty-three new patients with confirmed SCD but without historical comment in the BBIS had a type and screen performed after the implementation of the flag. Upon review, 4 (12%) did not have SCD-related diagnosis in their problem list and therefore lacked the trigger for the flag. Twenty-nine (88%) patients had the diagnosis in the problem list and all of them (100%) correctly displayed the flag.

Discussion and conclusion: The intervention provided additional alerts of patients with SCD across multiple laboratory workflows and aided in the recognition of eligible patients.

基于诊断的实验室信息系统标志支持镰状细胞病的专门输血方案。
目的:镰状细胞病(SCD)患者经常需要专门的输血支持。然而,血库不能轻易识别这些患者没有时间限制的图表审查。为了提高对SCD患者输血的循证实践的依从性,我们开发了一个实验室信息系统(LIS)集成标记系统。研究设计和方法:使用一套预定义的scd相关国际疾病分类-10诊断代码,在LIS内实施面向实验室的标志。标志显示在多个工作流位置,包括患者仪表板、血库标本接收界面和血库未完成工作列表。结果:血库技术人员使用这些标志在血库信息系统(BBIS)中验证和应用该机构现有的镰状细胞输血方案。33例确诊SCD但在BBIS中没有历史评论的新患者在实施该标志后进行了分型和筛查。经审查,4例(12%)患者的问题列表中没有scd相关诊断,因此缺乏触发标志的因素。29例(88%)患者的诊断出现在问题列表中,且全部(100%)患者正确显示了诊断标志。讨论和结论:该干预措施在多个实验室工作流程中为SCD患者提供了额外的警报,并有助于识别符合条件的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书