Caroline G Stanek, Ronald G Hauser, Katherine Madden, Bhushan Shah, Christopher A Tormey, Kerry Wallack, Nalan Yurtsever
{"title":"Diagnosis-based laboratory information system flags to support specialized transfusion protocols in sickle cell disease.","authors":"Caroline G Stanek, Ronald G Hauser, Katherine Madden, Bhushan Shah, Christopher A Tormey, Kerry Wallack, Nalan Yurtsever","doi":"10.1111/trf.70417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) frequently require specialized transfusion support. However, the blood bank cannot readily identify these patients without a time-prohibitive chart review. To improve adherence to evidence-based practices involving the transfusion of patients with SCD, we developed a laboratory information system (LIS)-integrated flagging system.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Using a predefined set of SCD-related International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnosis codes, laboratory-facing flags were implemented within the LIS. Flags were displayed in multiple workflow locations, including the patient dashboard, blood bank specimen receiving interface, and blood bank outstanding work list.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Blood bank technologists used the flags to verify and apply the institution's existing sickle cell transfusion protocol within the blood bank information system (BBIS). Thirty-three new patients with confirmed SCD but without historical comment in the BBIS had a type and screen performed after the implementation of the flag. Upon review, 4 (12%) did not have SCD-related diagnosis in their problem list and therefore lacked the trigger for the flag. Twenty-nine (88%) patients had the diagnosis in the problem list and all of them (100%) correctly displayed the flag.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The intervention provided additional alerts of patients with SCD across multiple laboratory workflows and aided in the recognition of eligible patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) frequently require specialized transfusion support. However, the blood bank cannot readily identify these patients without a time-prohibitive chart review. To improve adherence to evidence-based practices involving the transfusion of patients with SCD, we developed a laboratory information system (LIS)-integrated flagging system.
Study design and methods: Using a predefined set of SCD-related International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnosis codes, laboratory-facing flags were implemented within the LIS. Flags were displayed in multiple workflow locations, including the patient dashboard, blood bank specimen receiving interface, and blood bank outstanding work list.
Results: Blood bank technologists used the flags to verify and apply the institution's existing sickle cell transfusion protocol within the blood bank information system (BBIS). Thirty-three new patients with confirmed SCD but without historical comment in the BBIS had a type and screen performed after the implementation of the flag. Upon review, 4 (12%) did not have SCD-related diagnosis in their problem list and therefore lacked the trigger for the flag. Twenty-nine (88%) patients had the diagnosis in the problem list and all of them (100%) correctly displayed the flag.
Discussion and conclusion: The intervention provided additional alerts of patients with SCD across multiple laboratory workflows and aided in the recognition of eligible patients.
期刊介绍:
TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.