Comorbidity-Specific Risk of Revision Following Single-Level Degenerative Spinal Fusion (2010-2023): US Cohort Study Among Over 399K Patients.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2026-09-28 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005888
Arman Kishan, Harmon S Khela, Alex Hernandez Manriquez, Gregory S Kazarian, Mihir S Dekhne, Dhiraj J Pangal, Andrew J Schoenfeld, William C Eward, Sami H Tuffaha, Alan H Daniels, Raffi S Avedian, Han Jo Kim, Peter G Passias, Sravisht Iyer, Anand Veeravagu
{"title":"Comorbidity-Specific Risk of Revision Following Single-Level Degenerative Spinal Fusion (2010-2023): US Cohort Study Among Over 399K Patients.","authors":"Arman Kishan, Harmon S Khela, Alex Hernandez Manriquez, Gregory S Kazarian, Mihir S Dekhne, Dhiraj J Pangal, Andrew J Schoenfeld, William C Eward, Sami H Tuffaha, Alan H Daniels, Raffi S Avedian, Han Jo Kim, Peter G Passias, Sravisht Iyer, Anand Veeravagu","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the associations of 28 preoperative comorbidities with all-cause and etiology-specific revisions (pseudarthrosis, mechanical failure, adjacent segment disease [ASD], infection) following single-level degenerative spinal fusion.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Revision following spinal fusion for degenerative spinal disease remains frequent and costly. While technical factors are well studied, the extent to which preoperative comorbidities differentially predispose to specific revision etiologies is unclear.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using the PearlDiver Mariner170 claims database (2010-2023), we identified adults undergoing single-level degenerative spinal fusion and followed them for 2 years for reoperation. All-cause and etiology-specific revisions were defined by CPT/ICD codes. Preoperative comorbidities were analyzed using multivariable cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, and all comorbidities. Bonferroni correction set significance at P≤0.00036.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 399,186 patients (mean age 59.7±13.0; 56.7% female; mean CCI 1.4±1.2), anaemia (HR 1.33), osteoporosis (HR 1.31), substance-related disorders (HR 1.25), and depression (HR 1.19) conferred the greatest risk of all-cause revision. Type 2 diabetes (HR 1.07) and essential hypertension (HR 1.14) had smaller but significant effects. Etiology-specific analyses showed that osteoporosis, anaemia, depression, and substance-related disorders were consistently associated with increased risk across pseudarthrosis, mechanical failure, and ASD. Mechanical failure was additionally associated with hypertension (HR 1.20) and diabetes (HR 1.28), which were not significant in the other revision subtypes. In contrast, ASD revisions were uniquely associated with osteoarthritis (HR 1.26). No comorbidity was significantly associated with infection-related revision. All hazard ratios were significant at P<0.001 unless otherwise specified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this national cohort of patients, osteoporosis, anaemia, depression, and substance-related disorders emerged as significant predictors of non-infectious revision within two years. Hypertension and type 2 diabetes conferred more modest risks for mechanical failure. These findings support the integration of comorbidity-informed risk stratification into preoperative planning and highlight the potential optimization to minimize revisions and enhance clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005888","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort.

Objective: To evaluate the associations of 28 preoperative comorbidities with all-cause and etiology-specific revisions (pseudarthrosis, mechanical failure, adjacent segment disease [ASD], infection) following single-level degenerative spinal fusion.

Summary of background data: Revision following spinal fusion for degenerative spinal disease remains frequent and costly. While technical factors are well studied, the extent to which preoperative comorbidities differentially predispose to specific revision etiologies is unclear.

Materials and methods: Using the PearlDiver Mariner170 claims database (2010-2023), we identified adults undergoing single-level degenerative spinal fusion and followed them for 2 years for reoperation. All-cause and etiology-specific revisions were defined by CPT/ICD codes. Preoperative comorbidities were analyzed using multivariable cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, and all comorbidities. Bonferroni correction set significance at P≤0.00036.

Results: Among 399,186 patients (mean age 59.7±13.0; 56.7% female; mean CCI 1.4±1.2), anaemia (HR 1.33), osteoporosis (HR 1.31), substance-related disorders (HR 1.25), and depression (HR 1.19) conferred the greatest risk of all-cause revision. Type 2 diabetes (HR 1.07) and essential hypertension (HR 1.14) had smaller but significant effects. Etiology-specific analyses showed that osteoporosis, anaemia, depression, and substance-related disorders were consistently associated with increased risk across pseudarthrosis, mechanical failure, and ASD. Mechanical failure was additionally associated with hypertension (HR 1.20) and diabetes (HR 1.28), which were not significant in the other revision subtypes. In contrast, ASD revisions were uniquely associated with osteoarthritis (HR 1.26). No comorbidity was significantly associated with infection-related revision. All hazard ratios were significant at P<0.001 unless otherwise specified.

Conclusion: In this national cohort of patients, osteoporosis, anaemia, depression, and substance-related disorders emerged as significant predictors of non-infectious revision within two years. Hypertension and type 2 diabetes conferred more modest risks for mechanical failure. These findings support the integration of comorbidity-informed risk stratification into preoperative planning and highlight the potential optimization to minimize revisions and enhance clinical outcomes.

单节段退行性脊柱融合术后翻修术的合并症特异性风险(2010-2023):超过399K例患者的美国队列研究
研究设计:回顾性队列。目的:评估单节段退行性脊柱融合术后28种术前合并症与全因和病因特异性修复(假关节、机械故障、邻近节段疾病[ASD]、感染)的相关性。背景资料总结:脊柱融合术治疗退行性脊柱疾病后的翻修仍然是频繁且昂贵的。虽然技术因素得到了很好的研究,但术前合并症在多大程度上易受特定翻修病因的影响尚不清楚。材料和方法:使用PearlDiver Mariner170索赔数据库(2010-2023),我们确定了接受单节段退行性脊柱融合的成年人,并对他们进行了2年的随访以进行再手术。全因和病因特异性修订由CPT/ICD编码定义。术前合并症采用多变量cox比例风险模型进行分析,校正年龄、性别和所有合并症。Bonferroni校正集显著性P≤0.00036。结果:在399186例患者(平均年龄59.7±13.0;56.7%为女性;平均CCI 1.4±1.2)中,贫血(HR 1.33)、骨质疏松(HR 1.31)、物质相关疾病(HR 1.25)和抑郁(HR 1.19)是全因修正的最大风险。2型糖尿病(HR 1.07)和原发性高血压(HR 1.14)的影响较小,但具有显著性。病因特异性分析显示,骨质疏松、贫血、抑郁和物质相关疾病始终与假性关节、机械故障和ASD的风险增加相关。机械故障还与高血压(HR 1.20)和糖尿病(HR 1.28)相关,这在其他修正亚型中不显著。相反,ASD改版仅与骨关节炎相关(HR 1.26)。无合并症与感染相关翻修显著相关。结论:在这个全国性的患者队列中,骨质疏松症、贫血症、抑郁症和物质相关疾病成为两年内非感染性翻修的重要预测因素。高血压和2型糖尿病导致机械故障的风险较小。这些发现支持将合并症知情的风险分层纳入术前计划,并强调了潜在的优化,以减少翻修和提高临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书