Outcomes of Embryo Transfer Following Laser-assisted Hatching in Patients with Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Mohammadamin Parsaei, Elaheh Karimi, Parsa Seifi, Masoumeh Dehghan Tarzjani, Azadeh Tarafdari
{"title":"Outcomes of Embryo Transfer Following Laser-assisted Hatching in Patients with Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Mohammadamin Parsaei, Elaheh Karimi, Parsa Seifi, Masoumeh Dehghan Tarzjani, Azadeh Tarafdari","doi":"10.1007/s43032-026-02219-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) affects approximately 10% of women undergoing embryo transfer. While laser-assisted hatching (LAH) has been proposed to improve outcomes, its efficacy remains uncertain in RIF patients. This study evaluated whether LAH improves outcomes for women with RIF. A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase on January 22, 2025, for randomized controlled trials comparing embryo transfer outcomes following LAH versus controls in RIF. Random-effects meta-analyses generated log odds ratios (LOR), with evidence certainty graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. Nine studies involving 2,481 women with RIF were included. Meta-analysis revealed significantly higher rates in the LAH group compared to controls for clinical pregnancy (LOR = 0.643 [0.267, 1.019]; I<sup>2</sup> = 70.62%, very low certainty), ongoing pregnancy (LOR = 0.811 [0.076, 1.546]; I<sup>2</sup> = 63.54%, very low certainty), and live birth rate (LOR = 0.519 [0.127, 0.911]; I<sup>2</sup> = 15.21%, moderate certainty). Additionally, the LAH group had a significantly lower miscarriage rate (LOR = -0.632 [-1.136, -0.127]; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.00%, moderate certainty). No significant differences were observed for implantation rates (LOR = 0.691 [-0.036, 1.417]; I<sup>2</sup> = 87.14%, very low certainty) or multiple pregnancy rates per clinical pregnancy (LOR = 0.166 [-0.269, 0.600]; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.00%, moderate certainty). Our findings suggest that LAH before embryo transfer may improve pregnancy and live birth rates following embryo transfer in women with RIF; however, no significant effect was observed on implantation. Due to observed heterogeneity and the low quality of available studies, high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":20920,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-026-02219-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) affects approximately 10% of women undergoing embryo transfer. While laser-assisted hatching (LAH) has been proposed to improve outcomes, its efficacy remains uncertain in RIF patients. This study evaluated whether LAH improves outcomes for women with RIF. A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase on January 22, 2025, for randomized controlled trials comparing embryo transfer outcomes following LAH versus controls in RIF. Random-effects meta-analyses generated log odds ratios (LOR), with evidence certainty graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. Nine studies involving 2,481 women with RIF were included. Meta-analysis revealed significantly higher rates in the LAH group compared to controls for clinical pregnancy (LOR = 0.643 [0.267, 1.019]; I2 = 70.62%, very low certainty), ongoing pregnancy (LOR = 0.811 [0.076, 1.546]; I2 = 63.54%, very low certainty), and live birth rate (LOR = 0.519 [0.127, 0.911]; I2 = 15.21%, moderate certainty). Additionally, the LAH group had a significantly lower miscarriage rate (LOR = -0.632 [-1.136, -0.127]; I2 = 0.00%, moderate certainty). No significant differences were observed for implantation rates (LOR = 0.691 [-0.036, 1.417]; I2 = 87.14%, very low certainty) or multiple pregnancy rates per clinical pregnancy (LOR = 0.166 [-0.269, 0.600]; I2 = 0.00%, moderate certainty). Our findings suggest that LAH before embryo transfer may improve pregnancy and live birth rates following embryo transfer in women with RIF; however, no significant effect was observed on implantation. Due to observed heterogeneity and the low quality of available studies, high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

反复着床失败患者激光辅助孵化后胚胎移植的结果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
复发性植入失败(RIF)影响了大约10%的接受胚胎移植的妇女。虽然激光辅助孵化(LAH)已被提议改善预后,但其在RIF患者中的疗效仍不确定。本研究评估了LAH是否能改善RIF妇女的预后。2025年1月22日,PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和Embase对随机对照试验进行了系统回顾,比较了在RIF中LAH和对照组的胚胎移植结果。随机效应荟萃分析产生对数优势比(LOR),并使用建议评估、发展和评估工具对证据确定性进行分级。纳入了9项研究,涉及2481名RIF女性。meta分析显示,与对照组相比,LAH组在临床妊娠(LOR = 0.643 [0.267, 1.019]; I2 = 70.62%,极低确定性)、持续妊娠(LOR = 0.811 [0.076, 1.546]; I2 = 63.54%,极低确定性)和活产率(LOR = 0.519 [0.127, 0.911]; I2 = 15.21%,中等确定性)方面的发生率均显著高于对照组。此外,LAH组流产率显著低于对照组(LOR = -0.632 [-1.136, -0.127]; I2 = 0.00%,中等确定性)。着床率(LOR = 0.691 [-0.036, 1.417]; I2 = 87.14%,极低确定性)和每次临床妊娠的多胎率(LOR = 0.166 [-0.269, 0.600]; I2 = 0.00%,中等确定性)无显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,胚胎移植前的LAH可以提高RIF妇女胚胎移植后的妊娠率和活产率;然而,对种植无明显影响。由于观察到的异质性和现有研究的低质量,需要高质量、大规模的随机对照试验来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Sciences
Reproductive Sciences 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
322
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Sciences (RS) is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal publishing original research and reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. RS is multi-disciplinary and includes research in basic reproductive biology and medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, urogynecology, fertility/infertility, embryology, gynecologic/reproductive oncology, developmental biology, stem cell research, molecular/cellular biology and other related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书