Jennifer Wang, Ronnie L Shammas, Elizabeth Smith-Montes, Lillian A Boe, Robert Jr J Allen, Carrie S Stern, Jonas A Nelson
{"title":"Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes in Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Preliminary Analysis of Aesthetic Grading Tool Scores.","authors":"Jennifer Wang, Ronnie L Shammas, Elizabeth Smith-Montes, Lillian A Boe, Robert Jr J Allen, Carrie S Stern, Jonas A Nelson","doi":"10.1055/a-2968-4594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Objective assessment of aesthetic outcomes following post-mastectomy breast reconstruction remains challenging. The Aesthetic Grading Tool (AGT) was developed as a standardized tool to evaluate aesthetic outcomes independent of patient-reported satisfaction. This study aimed to identify factors associated with aesthetic outcomes using the AGT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 35 de-identified photographs of patients who underwent bilateral autologous reconstruction were included in the AGT. Respondents including attending physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, trainees, and patients rated aesthetic outcomes on a 5-point Likert scale. Associations between aesthetic scores and clinical variables, including receipt of radiation, 90-day readmission, and mastectomy type, were assessed. Differences in scores by respondent training level were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-one respondents completed the AGT. Of the 35 patients whose photographs are included in the AGT, 26% received radiation, and 91% underwent a skin-sparing mastectomy. Receipt of preoperative radiation was associated with lower scores (β = -0.68, 95% CI: - 1.3 to - 0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.039). Patients with 90-day readmission (1.98 vs. 3.15, <i>p</i> = 0.11) and those who underwent conventional as opposed to skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy (2.25 vs. 3.09 vs. 3.21, <i>p</i> = 0.5) trended toward lower AGT scores. Attending physicians consistently assigned higher scores across all variables, whereas patient respondents provided among the lowest scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Receipt of radiation is associated with worse aesthetic outcomes following bilateral autologous reconstruction. Patients with 90-day readmission and conventional mastectomy trend toward worse aesthetic outcomes. Providers should counsel patients who are undergoing bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction on expected aesthetic outcomes based on their treatment course.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2968-4594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Objective assessment of aesthetic outcomes following post-mastectomy breast reconstruction remains challenging. The Aesthetic Grading Tool (AGT) was developed as a standardized tool to evaluate aesthetic outcomes independent of patient-reported satisfaction. This study aimed to identify factors associated with aesthetic outcomes using the AGT.
Methods: A total of 35 de-identified photographs of patients who underwent bilateral autologous reconstruction were included in the AGT. Respondents including attending physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, trainees, and patients rated aesthetic outcomes on a 5-point Likert scale. Associations between aesthetic scores and clinical variables, including receipt of radiation, 90-day readmission, and mastectomy type, were assessed. Differences in scores by respondent training level were also analyzed.
Results: Ninety-one respondents completed the AGT. Of the 35 patients whose photographs are included in the AGT, 26% received radiation, and 91% underwent a skin-sparing mastectomy. Receipt of preoperative radiation was associated with lower scores (β = -0.68, 95% CI: - 1.3 to - 0.04, p = 0.039). Patients with 90-day readmission (1.98 vs. 3.15, p = 0.11) and those who underwent conventional as opposed to skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy (2.25 vs. 3.09 vs. 3.21, p = 0.5) trended toward lower AGT scores. Attending physicians consistently assigned higher scores across all variables, whereas patient respondents provided among the lowest scores.
Conclusion: Receipt of radiation is associated with worse aesthetic outcomes following bilateral autologous reconstruction. Patients with 90-day readmission and conventional mastectomy trend toward worse aesthetic outcomes. Providers should counsel patients who are undergoing bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction on expected aesthetic outcomes based on their treatment course.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers.
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases.
The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.