What Is the Impact of Coercive Control on Children Exposed to Domestic Violence?

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Jeffrey L Edleson
{"title":"What Is the Impact of Coercive Control on Children Exposed to Domestic Violence?","authors":"Jeffrey L Edleson","doi":"10.1177/08862605261493557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Moving beyond traditional frameworks focused on physical violence, the article adopts a comprehensive definition of coercive control as encompassing psychological abuse, isolation, stalking, and the systematic denial of autonomy, and argues that its effects on children are distinct and deeply harmful, often persisting long after direct exposure ends. Three key mechanisms of harm are identified: (1) <i>credible threats</i>, which compel children and mothers to constantly modify their behavior to avoid punishment, creating a chronically stressful environment akin to \"walking on eggshells\"; (2) <i>hypervigilance</i>, a state of continuous environmental scanning that depletes cognitive resources needed for learning and healthy social development; and (3) <i>disruption of developmental milestones</i>, including secure attachment, self-regulation, and social competence. Understudied areas require future research, including children's recovery trajectories after separation from a coercive parent, the use of children as surveillance tools by abusers post-separation, and \"litigation abuse\" whereby legal systems are used to maintain control and destabilize families. The author concludes that effectively protecting children requires recognizing coercive control as a systematic erosion of autonomy and safety, not merely a series of violent incidents, and calls for research to better inform therapeutic interventions and legal policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":" ","pages":"8862605261493557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605261493557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Moving beyond traditional frameworks focused on physical violence, the article adopts a comprehensive definition of coercive control as encompassing psychological abuse, isolation, stalking, and the systematic denial of autonomy, and argues that its effects on children are distinct and deeply harmful, often persisting long after direct exposure ends. Three key mechanisms of harm are identified: (1) credible threats, which compel children and mothers to constantly modify their behavior to avoid punishment, creating a chronically stressful environment akin to "walking on eggshells"; (2) hypervigilance, a state of continuous environmental scanning that depletes cognitive resources needed for learning and healthy social development; and (3) disruption of developmental milestones, including secure attachment, self-regulation, and social competence. Understudied areas require future research, including children's recovery trajectories after separation from a coercive parent, the use of children as surveillance tools by abusers post-separation, and "litigation abuse" whereby legal systems are used to maintain control and destabilize families. The author concludes that effectively protecting children requires recognizing coercive control as a systematic erosion of autonomy and safety, not merely a series of violent incidents, and calls for research to better inform therapeutic interventions and legal policy.

强制控制对遭受家庭暴力的儿童有何影响?
文章超越了以身体暴力为重点的传统框架,采用了强制性控制的综合定义,包括心理虐待、孤立、跟踪和系统地剥夺自主权,并认为其对儿童的影响是明显的和严重有害的,通常在直接接触结束后很长时间仍持续存在。研究确定了三种关键的伤害机制:(1)可信的威胁,迫使儿童和母亲不断改变自己的行为以避免惩罚,形成一种类似于“如履薄冰雪”的长期压力环境;(2)过度警觉,一种持续扫描环境的状态,消耗学习和健康社会发展所需的认知资源;(3)发展里程碑的破坏,包括安全依恋、自我调节和社会能力。研究不足的领域需要进一步的研究,包括儿童在与强制父母分离后的康复轨迹,虐待者在分离后将儿童用作监视工具,以及利用法律制度维持控制和破坏家庭稳定的“诉讼滥用”。作者的结论是,有效地保护儿童需要认识到强制控制是对自主权和安全的系统性侵蚀,而不仅仅是一系列暴力事件,并呼吁进行研究,以更好地为治疗干预和法律政策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书