Outcomes of volar locking plates for scaphoid fractures- A single surgeon case series.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Lauren Tiedt, Aoife O'Halloran, Olivia Flannery
{"title":"Outcomes of volar locking plates for scaphoid fractures- A single surgeon case series.","authors":"Lauren Tiedt, Aoife O'Halloran, Olivia Flannery","doi":"10.1007/s11845-026-04630-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical management of scaphoid fractures has traditionally been with headless compression screws.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Our primary aim was to establish the non-union rate in our series of patients whose scaphoid fractures were managed with volar locking plating. Our secondary aims were to assess; post-operative range of motion, post-operative grip strength, functional outcome and the removal of metal rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We underwent a retrospective review of 35 continuous patients who underwent surgery between June 2018 and August 2023 under a single surgeon for a scaphoid fracture using a Medartis volar locking plate for their primary surgery. Non-union was assessed radiographically on plain radiograph, or on a CT scan if union wasn't clear on the plain radiograph. Range of motion was measured bilaterally using a goniometer, and grip strength with a dynamometer. Functional outcome was assessed with a PRWHE score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We had a non-union rate of 2.75%. There was a significant decrease in range of motion compared to the contra-lateral side. There was a significant decrease in grip strength compared to the contralateral side. Average reported PRWHE was 10.9. There was a 34% removal of metal rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our series demonstrated excellent union rates. Range of motion and grip strength were decreased in the operative side compared to the contralateral side. PRWHE scores were relatively low and comparable to the scores in the published literature. The volar locking plate demonstrates increased stability compared to one headless screw, particularly rotational stability. However, there is a higher risk of needing a second operation for removal of symptomatic metalwork compared to when using headless compression screws.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-026-04630-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical management of scaphoid fractures has traditionally been with headless compression screws.

Aims: Our primary aim was to establish the non-union rate in our series of patients whose scaphoid fractures were managed with volar locking plating. Our secondary aims were to assess; post-operative range of motion, post-operative grip strength, functional outcome and the removal of metal rate.

Methods: We underwent a retrospective review of 35 continuous patients who underwent surgery between June 2018 and August 2023 under a single surgeon for a scaphoid fracture using a Medartis volar locking plate for their primary surgery. Non-union was assessed radiographically on plain radiograph, or on a CT scan if union wasn't clear on the plain radiograph. Range of motion was measured bilaterally using a goniometer, and grip strength with a dynamometer. Functional outcome was assessed with a PRWHE score.

Results: We had a non-union rate of 2.75%. There was a significant decrease in range of motion compared to the contra-lateral side. There was a significant decrease in grip strength compared to the contralateral side. Average reported PRWHE was 10.9. There was a 34% removal of metal rate.

Conclusions: Our series demonstrated excellent union rates. Range of motion and grip strength were decreased in the operative side compared to the contralateral side. PRWHE scores were relatively low and comparable to the scores in the published literature. The volar locking plate demonstrates increased stability compared to one headless screw, particularly rotational stability. However, there is a higher risk of needing a second operation for removal of symptomatic metalwork compared to when using headless compression screws.

掌侧锁定钢板治疗舟状骨骨折的疗效-单个外科医生病例系列。
背景:传统上,舟状骨骨折的外科治疗是使用无头加压螺钉。目的:我们的主要目的是确定掌侧锁定钢板治疗舟状骨骨折患者的不愈合率。我们的次要目的是评估;术后活动范围,术后握力,功能结局和金属去除率。方法:我们对2018年6月至2023年8月期间在同一名外科医生下接受舟状骨骨折手术的35例连续患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者使用Medartis掌侧锁定钢板作为初次手术。在x线平片上评估骨不愈合,如果x线平片上骨不愈合,则在CT扫描上评估。用角计测量两侧的运动范围,用测力计测量握力。功能结局用PRWHE评分进行评估。结果:骨不愈合率为2.75%。与对侧相比,活动范围明显减少。与对侧相比,握力明显下降。报告的平均PRWHE为10.9。金属去除率为34%。结论:我们的系列显示了良好的愈合率。与对侧相比,手术侧的活动范围和握力减小。PRWHE得分相对较低,与已发表文献中的得分相当。与无头螺钉相比,掌侧锁定钢板显示出更高的稳定性,尤其是旋转稳定性。然而,与使用无头加压螺钉相比,需要第二次手术去除有症状的金属制品的风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书