Cardiovascular Risk Triage Schema for Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With Hormone Therapy.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Avirup Guha, Ana Barac, Michael James Ryan, Randala Hamdan, Geeta Devgan, Catherine H Marshall, Silke Gillessen, Stacy Loeb, Rana R McKay, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Zachary Klaassen, Meenakshi Davuluri, Alan H Bryce, Yun Rose Li, Nader El-Chaar, Stephanie Braun, Maha Hussain, Pedro Barata, Martin W Schoen, Cora N Sternberg, Tamara Jamaspishvili, Samuel L Washington, Neal D Shore, David Morris, Jack R Andrews, Irbaz Bin Riaz, Daniel George, Soumyajit Roy, Gina B Carithers, Phillip Koo, Neeraj Agarwal, Andrew W Hahn
{"title":"Cardiovascular Risk Triage Schema for Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With Hormone Therapy.","authors":"Avirup Guha, Ana Barac, Michael James Ryan, Randala Hamdan, Geeta Devgan, Catherine H Marshall, Silke Gillessen, Stacy Loeb, Rana R McKay, Emmanuel S Antonarakis, Zachary Klaassen, Meenakshi Davuluri, Alan H Bryce, Yun Rose Li, Nader El-Chaar, Stephanie Braun, Maha Hussain, Pedro Barata, Martin W Schoen, Cora N Sternberg, Tamara Jamaspishvili, Samuel L Washington, Neal D Shore, David Morris, Jack R Andrews, Irbaz Bin Riaz, Daniel George, Soumyajit Roy, Gina B Carithers, Phillip Koo, Neeraj Agarwal, Andrew W Hahn","doi":"10.1200/OP-26-00312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading noncancer cause of death among patients with prostate cancer (PC). Population-based risk calculators do not account for treatment-related effects of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPis), and they have not been validated across PC treatment states.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>This Prostate Cancer Foundation-sponsored clinician-industry consensus and narrative review proposes a pragmatic identification and triage schema for point-of-care use. The schema supports rapid risk capture, tier assignment, and referral or risk-factor optimization triggers; it does not provide cardiovascular therapeutic algorithms. We synthesize evidence on baseline cardiometabolic burden, ADT-associated adiposity and muscle-strength changes, plaque progression, ARPi-associated hypertension and cardiac events, suboptimal real-world risk-factor control, and social-needs barriers. Patients are classified as high risk when they have prior major cardiovascular events or established clinical atherosclerotic CVD; intermediate risk when they have no prior event but at least two uncontrolled or adverse risk factors; and low risk when neither criterion is met. We clarify cutpoints, the rationale for operational thresholding, essential versus optional intake elements, and capacity-sensitive referral pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>The proposed three-tier schema should be viewed as a hypothesis-generating checklist for oncology, urology, radiation oncology, primary care, and cardiovascular teams. Prospective validation, workflow testing, calibration of referral thresholds, and inclusion of patient and clinic-staff stakeholders are required before broad implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2600312"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-26-00312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading noncancer cause of death among patients with prostate cancer (PC). Population-based risk calculators do not account for treatment-related effects of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPis), and they have not been validated across PC treatment states.

Observations: This Prostate Cancer Foundation-sponsored clinician-industry consensus and narrative review proposes a pragmatic identification and triage schema for point-of-care use. The schema supports rapid risk capture, tier assignment, and referral or risk-factor optimization triggers; it does not provide cardiovascular therapeutic algorithms. We synthesize evidence on baseline cardiometabolic burden, ADT-associated adiposity and muscle-strength changes, plaque progression, ARPi-associated hypertension and cardiac events, suboptimal real-world risk-factor control, and social-needs barriers. Patients are classified as high risk when they have prior major cardiovascular events or established clinical atherosclerotic CVD; intermediate risk when they have no prior event but at least two uncontrolled or adverse risk factors; and low risk when neither criterion is met. We clarify cutpoints, the rationale for operational thresholding, essential versus optional intake elements, and capacity-sensitive referral pathways.

Conclusion and relevance: The proposed three-tier schema should be viewed as a hypothesis-generating checklist for oncology, urology, radiation oncology, primary care, and cardiovascular teams. Prospective validation, workflow testing, calibration of referral thresholds, and inclusion of patient and clinic-staff stakeholders are required before broad implementation.

前列腺癌激素治疗患者心血管风险分类方案
重要性:心血管疾病(CVD)是前列腺癌(PC)患者死亡的主要非癌症原因。基于人群的风险计算并没有考虑到雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)和雄激素受体途径抑制剂(ARPis)的治疗相关效果,它们也没有在PC治疗状态下得到验证。观察:这项由前列腺癌基金会赞助的临床医生-行业共识和叙述性综述提出了一种实用的识别和分诊方案。该模式支持快速风险捕获、层分配和推荐或风险因素优化触发器;它不提供心血管治疗算法。我们综合了基线心脏代谢负担、adt相关的肥胖和肌肉力量变化、斑块进展、arpi相关的高血压和心脏事件、次优现实世界风险因素控制和社会需求障碍的证据。当患者先前有重大心血管事件或临床已确定的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病时,将其归类为高风险;中度风险:先前没有事件,但至少有两个不受控制或不利的风险因素;当两项标准都不满足时,风险就很低。我们澄清了切入点,操作阈值的基本原理,必要的与可选的摄入元素,以及能力敏感的转诊途径。结论和相关性:建议的三层方案应被视为肿瘤学、泌尿学、放射肿瘤学、初级保健和心血管团队的假设生成清单。在广泛实施之前,需要进行前瞻性验证、工作流程测试、转诊阈值校准以及纳入患者和临床工作人员利益相关者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书