Differences in Dietary-Related Experiences, Determinants, and Information-Seeking Behaviors Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

IF 2.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Janine P M Faessen, Desiree A Lucassen, Edith J M Feskens, Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma
{"title":"Differences in Dietary-Related Experiences, Determinants, and Information-Seeking Behaviors Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.","authors":"Janine P M Faessen, Desiree A Lucassen, Edith J M Feskens, Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma","doi":"10.2196/73808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple studies have highlighted the prevalence of suboptimal dietary patterns during pregnancy and the postpartum period, with some studies indicating factors that influence dietary behaviors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to map the differences in dietary-related experiences, determinants, and information-seeking behaviors, focusing on app use, during the pregnancy and postpartum periods among Dutch women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 1619 women recruited via social media filled in an online questionnaire consisting of 32 multiple-choice, 2 ranking, 11 rating, and 20 open-ended questions covering demographics, dietary-related activities during pregnancy and the postpartum period, determinants of these activities, and information-seeking behaviors focusing on app use. Questions were specific to pregnancy or postpartum, and responses were compared using chi-square tests, ANOVA, or 2-tailed <i>t</i> tests between perinatal phases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained data from 842 pregnant and 777 postpartum women. Mean age was 32 (SD 4) years, mean self-reported prepregnancy BMI was 25 (SD 5) kg/m², and most participants were highly educated (1214/1619, 75.0%). Pregnant and postpartum women valued healthy nutrition (mean 8.5, SD 1.2 on a 10-point scale). Pregnant women rated their food enjoyment and diet quality lowest during the first trimester, with scores of 6.3 (SD 2.5) and 6.3 (SD 1.9) out of 10, respectively. Compared with pregnant women, postpartum women had less phase-specific nutritional knowledge (354/745, 47.5% vs 533/820, 65.0%), less time for food preparation (365/726, 50.3% vs 618/803, 77.0%), and less time for eating (524/721, 72.7% vs 773/799, 96.7%), but were more eager to learn about phase-specific healthy food choices (313/745, 42.0% vs 234/820, 28.5%) and felt more capable of food preparation (mean 7.3 SD 2.2 vs mean 6.9, SD 2.2). During pregnancy, the main reason for eating was the child's health, while in postpartum, the main reason was hunger. Key sources of nutrition information were websites (1337/1565, 85.4%), health care professionals (805/1565, 51.4%), and apps (665/1565, 42.5%). Phase-specific app use dropped from 90.8% (713/785) during pregnancy to 58.9% (418/710) postpartum, with many women being unaware of the existence of postpartum apps. Important factors to consider for app use included credibility, ease of use, and free access.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results highlighted significant differences in dietary-related experiences, determinants, and information-seeking behaviors between pregnant and postpartum women, underscoring the need for tailored dietary support tools for each phase. The limited availability of postpartum nutrition resources, such as apps, highlighted the need to develop improved digital nutritional counseling solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e73808"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13618406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/73808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple studies have highlighted the prevalence of suboptimal dietary patterns during pregnancy and the postpartum period, with some studies indicating factors that influence dietary behaviors.

Objective: This study aimed to map the differences in dietary-related experiences, determinants, and information-seeking behaviors, focusing on app use, during the pregnancy and postpartum periods among Dutch women.

Methods: In total, 1619 women recruited via social media filled in an online questionnaire consisting of 32 multiple-choice, 2 ranking, 11 rating, and 20 open-ended questions covering demographics, dietary-related activities during pregnancy and the postpartum period, determinants of these activities, and information-seeking behaviors focusing on app use. Questions were specific to pregnancy or postpartum, and responses were compared using chi-square tests, ANOVA, or 2-tailed t tests between perinatal phases.

Results: We obtained data from 842 pregnant and 777 postpartum women. Mean age was 32 (SD 4) years, mean self-reported prepregnancy BMI was 25 (SD 5) kg/m², and most participants were highly educated (1214/1619, 75.0%). Pregnant and postpartum women valued healthy nutrition (mean 8.5, SD 1.2 on a 10-point scale). Pregnant women rated their food enjoyment and diet quality lowest during the first trimester, with scores of 6.3 (SD 2.5) and 6.3 (SD 1.9) out of 10, respectively. Compared with pregnant women, postpartum women had less phase-specific nutritional knowledge (354/745, 47.5% vs 533/820, 65.0%), less time for food preparation (365/726, 50.3% vs 618/803, 77.0%), and less time for eating (524/721, 72.7% vs 773/799, 96.7%), but were more eager to learn about phase-specific healthy food choices (313/745, 42.0% vs 234/820, 28.5%) and felt more capable of food preparation (mean 7.3 SD 2.2 vs mean 6.9, SD 2.2). During pregnancy, the main reason for eating was the child's health, while in postpartum, the main reason was hunger. Key sources of nutrition information were websites (1337/1565, 85.4%), health care professionals (805/1565, 51.4%), and apps (665/1565, 42.5%). Phase-specific app use dropped from 90.8% (713/785) during pregnancy to 58.9% (418/710) postpartum, with many women being unaware of the existence of postpartum apps. Important factors to consider for app use included credibility, ease of use, and free access.

Conclusions: Our results highlighted significant differences in dietary-related experiences, determinants, and information-seeking behaviors between pregnant and postpartum women, underscoring the need for tailored dietary support tools for each phase. The limited availability of postpartum nutrition resources, such as apps, highlighted the need to develop improved digital nutritional counseling solutions.

孕妇和产后妇女饮食相关经历、决定因素和信息寻求行为的差异:横断面调查研究。
背景:多项研究强调了孕期和产后亚理想饮食模式的普遍存在,一些研究指出了影响饮食行为的因素。目的:本研究旨在绘制荷兰妇女在怀孕和产后期间饮食相关经历、决定因素和信息寻求行为的差异,重点是应用程序的使用。方法:通过社交媒体共招募了1619名女性,填写了一份在线问卷,包括32个多项选择题、2个排名题、11个评分题和20个开放式问题,涵盖人口统计学、孕期和产后饮食相关活动、这些活动的决定因素以及关注应用程序使用的信息寻求行为。问题是针对怀孕或产后的,在围产期之间使用卡方检验、方差分析或双尾t检验进行比较。结果:我们获得了842名孕妇和777名产后妇女的数据。平均年龄32岁(SD 4),孕前自我报告的平均BMI为25 (SD 5) kg/m²,大多数参与者受过高等教育(1214/1619,75.0%)。孕妇和产后妇女重视健康营养(在10分制中平均8.5分,标准差1.2分)。孕妇在怀孕前三个月对食物享受和饮食质量的评分最低,满分10分分别为6.3分(SD 2.5)和6.3分(SD 1.9)。与孕妇相比,产后妇女对特定阶段营养知识的掌握程度较低(354/745,47.5%比533/820,65.0%),准备食物的时间较短(365/726,50.3%比618/803,77.0%),进食时间较短(524/721,72.7%比718 /803,96.7%),但更渴望了解特定阶段健康食品的选择(313/745,42.0%比234/820,28.5%),对准备食物的能力更强(平均7.3 SD 2.2比平均6.9 SD 2.2)。在怀孕期间,吃的主要原因是孩子的健康,而在产后,主要原因是饥饿。营养信息的主要来源为网站(1337/1565,85.4%)、卫生保健专业人员(805/1565,51.4%)和应用程序(665/1565,42.5%)。特定阶段应用程序的使用率从怀孕期间的90.8%(713/785)下降到产后的58.9%(418/710),许多女性不知道产后应用程序的存在。使用应用时需要考虑的重要因素包括可信度、易用性和免费访问。结论:我们的研究结果强调了孕妇和产后妇女在饮食相关经历、决定因素和信息寻求行为方面的显著差异,强调了每个阶段量身定制饮食支持工具的必要性。产后营养资源(如应用程序)的可用性有限,这凸显了开发改进的数字营养咨询解决方案的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书