Pelvic Organ Prolapse with Concomitant Short Total Vaginal Length and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Mesh Sacrocolpopexy.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lubos Karasek, Vladimir Kalis, Matej Vidoman, Martin Smazinka, Zdenek Rusavy, Khaled M Ismail
{"title":"Pelvic Organ Prolapse with Concomitant Short Total Vaginal Length and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Mesh Sacrocolpopexy.","authors":"Lubos Karasek, Vladimir Kalis, Matej Vidoman, Martin Smazinka, Zdenek Rusavy, Khaled M Ismail","doi":"10.1007/s00192-026-06873-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Total vaginal length (TVL) is an important parameter in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) assessment and is significantly associated with POP symptoms. Short TVL (STVL) has been associated with pessary failure and dyspareunia. There is no consensus regarding optimal management of patients with STVL and symptomatic POP. This study was aimed at comparing patient-reported and clinical urogynecological outcomes following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in patients with short versus normal TVL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary urogynecology center. Patients with a history of total hysterectomy who underwent LSC for symptomatic POP between January 2015 and January 2023 were included. Patients were grouped according to preoperative TVL into STVL and normal TVL (NTVL) cohorts, using cut-off values of ≤ 6 cm and ≥ 8 cm respectively. Clinical, patient-reported, and imaging outcomes were assessed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 166 patients were included, with 89 (53.6%) in the STVL group and 77 (46.6%) in the NTVL group. Postoperatively, TVL significantly increased in the STVL group compared with the NTVL group (2.3 ± 0.9 vs - 0.2 ± 0.8; p < 0.0001). The proportions of patients reporting the highest satisfaction (Patient Global Impression of Improvement ≤ 2) in the groups were comparable (97.5% vs 94.0%; p = 0.279). No significant differences between groups were observed in postoperative quality-of-life improvement measured by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary incontinence Short Form.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient-reported and clinical outcomes following LSC were comparable in patients with short and normal TVL, indicating that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy may be a feasible option for apical patients with symptomatic POP with a short vagina after a previous hysterectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-026-06873-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Total vaginal length (TVL) is an important parameter in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) assessment and is significantly associated with POP symptoms. Short TVL (STVL) has been associated with pessary failure and dyspareunia. There is no consensus regarding optimal management of patients with STVL and symptomatic POP. This study was aimed at comparing patient-reported and clinical urogynecological outcomes following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in patients with short versus normal TVL.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary urogynecology center. Patients with a history of total hysterectomy who underwent LSC for symptomatic POP between January 2015 and January 2023 were included. Patients were grouped according to preoperative TVL into STVL and normal TVL (NTVL) cohorts, using cut-off values of ≤ 6 cm and ≥ 8 cm respectively. Clinical, patient-reported, and imaging outcomes were assessed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively.

Results: A total of 166 patients were included, with 89 (53.6%) in the STVL group and 77 (46.6%) in the NTVL group. Postoperatively, TVL significantly increased in the STVL group compared with the NTVL group (2.3 ± 0.9 vs - 0.2 ± 0.8; p < 0.0001). The proportions of patients reporting the highest satisfaction (Patient Global Impression of Improvement ≤ 2) in the groups were comparable (97.5% vs 94.0%; p = 0.279). No significant differences between groups were observed in postoperative quality-of-life improvement measured by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary incontinence Short Form.

Conclusions: Patient-reported and clinical outcomes following LSC were comparable in patients with short and normal TVL, indicating that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy may be a feasible option for apical patients with symptomatic POP with a short vagina after a previous hysterectomy.

伴有阴道总长度短的盆腔器官脱垂和腹腔镜补片骶阴道固定术的疗效。
引言与假设:阴道总长度(TVL)是评估盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的重要参数,与POP症状有显著相关性。短TVL (STVL)与子宫衰竭和性交困难有关。对于STVL和有症状的POP患者的最佳处理尚无共识。本研究旨在比较短TVL和正常TVL患者腹腔镜骶colpop固定术(LSC)后患者报告和临床泌尿妇科结果。方法:回顾性队列研究在某三级泌尿妇科中心进行。纳入2015年1月至2023年1月期间因症状性POP接受LSC的全子宫切除术史患者。根据术前TVL分为STVL组和正常TVL组(NTVL),分界值分别为≤6 cm和≥8 cm。术前和术后12个月评估临床、患者报告和影像学结果。结果:共纳入166例患者,其中STVL组89例(53.6%),NTVL组77例(46.6%)。与NTVL组相比,STVL组术后TVL显著升高(2.3±0.9 vs - 0.2±0.8);p结论:短TVL和正常TVL患者在LSC后的患者报告和临床结果相当,表明腹腔镜骶阴道固定术可能是先前子宫切除术后出现症状性短阴道的顶尖POP患者的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书