Repurposing Gastric Cancer Biomarkers for Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma: ERBB2 and Claudin 18.2 as Therapeutic Targets.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Shuaijin Wang, Astrid De Boeck, Eun Young Kang, Nicola S Meagher, Kylie L Gorringe, Gregg S Nelson, Cheng Han Lee, Parham Minoo, Martin Köbel
{"title":"Repurposing Gastric Cancer Biomarkers for Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma: ERBB2 and Claudin 18.2 as Therapeutic Targets.","authors":"Shuaijin Wang, Astrid De Boeck, Eun Young Kang, Nicola S Meagher, Kylie L Gorringe, Gregg S Nelson, Cheng Han Lee, Parham Minoo, Martin Köbel","doi":"10.1097/PGP.0000000000001219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOCs) have an upper-gastrointestinal cell phenotype (CK7+/SATB2-) similar to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). We aimed to develop an immunohistochemical panel that accurately discriminates MOC from GA. A secondary objective was to compare molecular and targetable tissue-based biomarkers across MOC, GA, and PDAC. Immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue microarrays representing 103 MOC, 265 PDAC, and 159 GA for markers of cell lineage (CK17, MEP1A, PAX8, CDX2, and HIK1083), key molecular alterations [TP53, Mismatch Repair deficiency (MMRd), CTNNB1, ARID1A, and SMAD4], as well as potential antibody targets (ERBB2 and Claudin 18.2). In situ hybridization was performed for Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA. A lasso-penalized nominal logistic regression model discriminated the 3 entities with low overall accuracy [77.8%, area under the curve (AUC)=0.91]. Discrimination from others was highest for PDAC (AUC=0.93) and MOC (AUC=0.92), but lowest for GA (AUC=0.87), and MOC was more similar to GA than to PDAC. MOC more frequently showed Claudin 18.2 PS2+ high (42%) and ERBB2 IHC3+ (25%) than GA (Claudin 18.2, 25%; ERBB2, 3%; MMRd, 19%) and PDAC (Claudin 18.2, 10%; ERBB2, 0%; MMRd, 2%). At least 1 potentially targetable alteration was present in 60% of MOC, 43% of GA, and 12% of PDAC. While our marker panel is of insufficient diagnostic accuracy to distinguish MOC from GA, based on the similarity between MOC and GA, consideration should be given to include MOC in clinical basket trials targeting ERBB2 and Claudin 18.2.</p>","PeriodicalId":14001,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PGP.0000000000001219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOCs) have an upper-gastrointestinal cell phenotype (CK7+/SATB2-) similar to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). We aimed to develop an immunohistochemical panel that accurately discriminates MOC from GA. A secondary objective was to compare molecular and targetable tissue-based biomarkers across MOC, GA, and PDAC. Immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue microarrays representing 103 MOC, 265 PDAC, and 159 GA for markers of cell lineage (CK17, MEP1A, PAX8, CDX2, and HIK1083), key molecular alterations [TP53, Mismatch Repair deficiency (MMRd), CTNNB1, ARID1A, and SMAD4], as well as potential antibody targets (ERBB2 and Claudin 18.2). In situ hybridization was performed for Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA. A lasso-penalized nominal logistic regression model discriminated the 3 entities with low overall accuracy [77.8%, area under the curve (AUC)=0.91]. Discrimination from others was highest for PDAC (AUC=0.93) and MOC (AUC=0.92), but lowest for GA (AUC=0.87), and MOC was more similar to GA than to PDAC. MOC more frequently showed Claudin 18.2 PS2+ high (42%) and ERBB2 IHC3+ (25%) than GA (Claudin 18.2, 25%; ERBB2, 3%; MMRd, 19%) and PDAC (Claudin 18.2, 10%; ERBB2, 0%; MMRd, 2%). At least 1 potentially targetable alteration was present in 60% of MOC, 43% of GA, and 12% of PDAC. While our marker panel is of insufficient diagnostic accuracy to distinguish MOC from GA, based on the similarity between MOC and GA, consideration should be given to include MOC in clinical basket trials targeting ERBB2 and Claudin 18.2.

重新利用胃癌生物标志物治疗黏液性卵巢癌:ERBB2和Claudin 18.2作为治疗靶点
粘液性卵巢癌(MOCs)具有类似于胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)和胃腺癌(GA)的上胃肠道细胞表型(CK7+/SATB2-)。我们的目标是建立一个免疫组织化学小组,以准确区分MOC和GA。第二个目的是比较MOC、GA和PDAC的分子和靶向组织生物标志物。对代表103 MOC、265 PDAC和159 GA的组织微阵列进行免疫组化,用于细胞系标记(CK17、MEP1A、PAX8、CDX2和HIK1083)、关键分子改变[TP53、错配修复缺陷(MMRd)、CTNNB1、ARID1A和SMAD4]以及潜在抗体靶点(ERBB2和Claudin 18.2)。对Epstein-Barr病毒编码的RNA进行原位杂交。套索惩罚的名义逻辑回归模型区分出总体准确率较低的3个实体[77.8%,曲线下面积(AUC)=0.91]。对他人的歧视在PDAC (AUC=0.93)和MOC (AUC=0.92)中最高,而在GA (AUC=0.87)中最低,MOC与GA的相似性大于PDAC。MOC比GA (Claudin 18.2, 25%; ERBB2, 3%; MMRd, 19%)和PDAC (Claudin 18.2, 10%; ERBB2, 0%; MMRd, 2%)更常出现Claudin 18.2 PS2+高(42%)和ERBB2 IHC3+(25%)。在60%的MOC、43%的GA和12%的PDAC中存在至少1个潜在的靶向性改变。虽然我们的标记物小组在区分MOC和GA方面的诊断准确性不足,但基于MOC和GA之间的相似性,应考虑将MOC纳入针对ERBB2和Claudin 18.2的临床篮子试验中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Gynecological Pathology is the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists (ISGyP), and provides complete and timely coverage of advances in the understanding and management of gynecological disease. Emphasis is placed on investigations in the field of anatomic pathology. Articles devoted to experimental or animal pathology clearly relevant to an understanding of human disease are published, as are pathological and clinicopathological studies and individual case reports that offer new insights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书