Interlocking pentagons task and visuospatial deficit in parkinsonian syndrome: a quantitative approach.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Giulia Donzuso, F Cilio, E Ferrante, C D'Agate, G Fazzina, C E Cicero, G Mostile, A Nicoletti, M Zappia
{"title":"Interlocking pentagons task and visuospatial deficit in parkinsonian syndrome: a quantitative approach.","authors":"Giulia Donzuso, F Cilio, E Ferrante, C D'Agate, G Fazzina, C E Cicero, G Mostile, A Nicoletti, M Zappia","doi":"10.1007/s00415-026-14163-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Visuo-spatial impairment is a common feature in parkinsonian disorders and differentiating idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) from atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APS), i.e. progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), and corticobasal degeneration (CBD), remains a major clinical challenge. The Qualitative Scoring Pentagon Test (QSPT), derived from the MMSE pentagon-copying item, provides quantitative visuo-constructive assessment but has not been systematically evaluated as a differential marker in parkinsonism. Aim of the study was to assess the discriminative value of the QSPT total score and sub-items across parkinsonian syndromes, and to examine associations with neuropsychological tests, motor severity, and MRI morphometric indices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with PD and APS were enrolled and underwent clinical and neuropsychological evaluations including MMSE, Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), Trail Making Test (TMT-A), and MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-Section III (MDS-UPDRS-III). A group of healthy controls (HC) were also enrolled performing MMSE. Pentagon drawings were scored quantitatively (QSPT). When available, MRI morphometric features were collected. Statistical analysis were performed to assess associations between QSPT, cognitive and clinical features, and to evaluate differences between patients and HC and across patients' groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred and forty patients (PD=91, PSP=23, MSA=17, CBD=9) and 92 HC were enrolled. QSPT differed significantly considering HC performances (12.7 ± 0.5) versus patients groups, and across groups (p<0.001), with PD scoring the highest (11.5 ± 2.1) and CBD the lowest score (7.7 ± 4.4). PD differed from PSP (p<0.001), CBD (p<0.001) and MSA (p=0.040). Rotation and number-of-angles sub-items were the most discriminating features. QSPT significantly correlated with MMSE, FAB, TMT-A, and MRPI (all p<0.01). Multivariate models demonstrated that QSPT was independently associated with APS (OR=0.620, 95%CI 0.469-0.820, p<0.001). A QSPT score ≤ 8 points discriminated PD from APS with an AUC of 0.764 and a specificity of 92.3%, and ≤ 11 points discriminated synucleinopathies from tauopathies with a higher AUC (0.804).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that quantitative scoring of the MMSE pentagon-copying item could differentiate PD from APS. The presence of association between QSPT and MRI brainstem morphometry could also reflect a structural association, specifically identifying tauopathies. QSPT could be a simple and supportive clinical tool, embedded within the MMSE that could differentiates patients from HC and PD from APS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"273 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13619795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-026-14163-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Visuo-spatial impairment is a common feature in parkinsonian disorders and differentiating idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) from atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APS), i.e. progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), and corticobasal degeneration (CBD), remains a major clinical challenge. The Qualitative Scoring Pentagon Test (QSPT), derived from the MMSE pentagon-copying item, provides quantitative visuo-constructive assessment but has not been systematically evaluated as a differential marker in parkinsonism. Aim of the study was to assess the discriminative value of the QSPT total score and sub-items across parkinsonian syndromes, and to examine associations with neuropsychological tests, motor severity, and MRI morphometric indices.

Methods: Patients with PD and APS were enrolled and underwent clinical and neuropsychological evaluations including MMSE, Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), Trail Making Test (TMT-A), and MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-Section III (MDS-UPDRS-III). A group of healthy controls (HC) were also enrolled performing MMSE. Pentagon drawings were scored quantitatively (QSPT). When available, MRI morphometric features were collected. Statistical analysis were performed to assess associations between QSPT, cognitive and clinical features, and to evaluate differences between patients and HC and across patients' groups.

Results: One-hundred and forty patients (PD=91, PSP=23, MSA=17, CBD=9) and 92 HC were enrolled. QSPT differed significantly considering HC performances (12.7 ± 0.5) versus patients groups, and across groups (p<0.001), with PD scoring the highest (11.5 ± 2.1) and CBD the lowest score (7.7 ± 4.4). PD differed from PSP (p<0.001), CBD (p<0.001) and MSA (p=0.040). Rotation and number-of-angles sub-items were the most discriminating features. QSPT significantly correlated with MMSE, FAB, TMT-A, and MRPI (all p<0.01). Multivariate models demonstrated that QSPT was independently associated with APS (OR=0.620, 95%CI 0.469-0.820, p<0.001). A QSPT score ≤ 8 points discriminated PD from APS with an AUC of 0.764 and a specificity of 92.3%, and ≤ 11 points discriminated synucleinopathies from tauopathies with a higher AUC (0.804).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that quantitative scoring of the MMSE pentagon-copying item could differentiate PD from APS. The presence of association between QSPT and MRI brainstem morphometry could also reflect a structural association, specifically identifying tauopathies. QSPT could be a simple and supportive clinical tool, embedded within the MMSE that could differentiates patients from HC and PD from APS.

联锁五角形任务和帕金森综合征的视觉空间缺陷:定量方法。
视觉空间障碍是帕金森病的共同特征,区分特发性帕金森病(PD)与非典型帕金森综合征(APS),即进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)、多系统萎缩(MSA)和皮质基底变性(CBD),仍然是一个主要的临床挑战。定性评分五边形测试(QSPT),衍生自MMSE五边形复制项目,提供定量的视觉建构性评估,但尚未被系统地评估为帕金森病的鉴别标记。本研究的目的是评估QSPT总分和分项在帕金森综合征中的鉴别价值,并检查与神经心理测试、运动严重程度和MRI形态计量指标的相关性。方法:纳入PD和APS患者,并进行临床和神经心理学评估,包括MMSE、正面评估组(FAB)、Trail Making Test (TMT-A)和mds -统一帕金森病评定量表第三部分(MDS-UPDRS-III)。一组健康对照(HC)也加入了MMSE。五角大楼图纸进行定量评分(QSPT)。可用时,收集MRI形态特征。通过统计分析来评估QSPT、认知和临床特征之间的关联,并评估患者与HC之间以及患者组之间的差异。结果:共纳入140例患者(PD=91, PSP=23, MSA=17, CBD=9)和92例HC。考虑HC表现的QSPT在患者组和组间差异显著(12.7±0.5)。结论:MMSE五边形复制项目的定量评分可以区分PD和APS。QSPT和MRI脑干形态测定之间的关联也可以反映出一种结构关联,特别是识别牛头病变。QSPT可能是一种简单而支持性的临床工具,嵌入MMSE中,可以区分HC、PD和APS患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书