Scoping Review of Implementation Science in Digital Intervention Research for Substance Use Disorders.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Deepika Rao, Madison K Clement, Caitlin M Reardon, Lisa Saldana, Aimee N C Campbell, Sarah E Lord
{"title":"Scoping Review of Implementation Science in Digital Intervention Research for Substance Use Disorders.","authors":"Deepika Rao, Madison K Clement, Caitlin M Reardon, Lisa Saldana, Aimee N C Campbell, Sarah E Lord","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Digital substance use interventions (DSUI) have demonstrated effectiveness in preventing, treating, and supporting recovery of substance use disorders (SUD), but their large-scale adoption and sustained implementation remain limited. To highlight the state of the science for DSUI implementation research, we conducted a scoping review of relevant studies of implementation of DSUI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - Scoping Review guidelines. Search was conducted using keywords (eg, technology, substance use, implementation) in Medline, PsycINFO, and Health Technology Assessment databases. Studies without implementation data, protocols, reviews, editorials, and non-English papers were excluded. Publications were included through February 2023. We screened 4178 abstracts and 148 full texts using Covidence software. We extracted implementation-related data from the included studies and organized it using standardized terminology for implementation determinants, strategies, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 48 studies represented implementation (n=7), determinant (n=8), and combined effectiveness and implementation studies or hybrid studies (n=33). Most common DSUI were treatment and recovery support approaches for general drug use, most frequently delivered as electronic programs on computers. Only 12 of 48 studies used implementation frameworks. Implementation strategies were rarely described. Acceptability was the most evaluated implementation outcome (n=26), and no study evaluated implementation costs. Evaluation of patient-level implementation determinants and longer-term sustainment outcomes was lacking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To accelerate translation and improve research rigor, future DSUI research should systematically apply implementation science frameworks to evaluate implementation determinants (including patient-level), document and test implementation strategies, and evaluate outcomes, including fidelity, cost, and sustainment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Digital substance use interventions (DSUI) have demonstrated effectiveness in preventing, treating, and supporting recovery of substance use disorders (SUD), but their large-scale adoption and sustained implementation remain limited. To highlight the state of the science for DSUI implementation research, we conducted a scoping review of relevant studies of implementation of DSUI.

Methods: We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - Scoping Review guidelines. Search was conducted using keywords (eg, technology, substance use, implementation) in Medline, PsycINFO, and Health Technology Assessment databases. Studies without implementation data, protocols, reviews, editorials, and non-English papers were excluded. Publications were included through February 2023. We screened 4178 abstracts and 148 full texts using Covidence software. We extracted implementation-related data from the included studies and organized it using standardized terminology for implementation determinants, strategies, and outcomes.

Results: The 48 studies represented implementation (n=7), determinant (n=8), and combined effectiveness and implementation studies or hybrid studies (n=33). Most common DSUI were treatment and recovery support approaches for general drug use, most frequently delivered as electronic programs on computers. Only 12 of 48 studies used implementation frameworks. Implementation strategies were rarely described. Acceptability was the most evaluated implementation outcome (n=26), and no study evaluated implementation costs. Evaluation of patient-level implementation determinants and longer-term sustainment outcomes was lacking.

Conclusions: To accelerate translation and improve research rigor, future DSUI research should systematically apply implementation science frameworks to evaluate implementation determinants (including patient-level), document and test implementation strategies, and evaluate outcomes, including fidelity, cost, and sustainment.

物质使用障碍数字干预研究中实施科学的范围综述。
数字物质使用干预(DSUI)在预防、治疗和支持物质使用障碍(SUD)康复方面已经证明了有效性,但其大规模采用和持续实施仍然有限。为了突出DSUI实施研究的科学现状,我们对DSUI实施的相关研究进行了范围审查。方法:我们使用首选报告项目进行系统评价和荟萃分析-范围评价指南。在Medline、PsycINFO和Health technology Assessment数据库中使用关键词(如技术、物质使用、实施)进行搜索。没有实施数据、方案、综述、社论和非英文论文的研究被排除在外。出版物包括到2023年2月。我们使用covid - ence软件筛选了4178篇摘要和148篇全文。我们从纳入的研究中提取了与实施相关的数据,并使用实施决定因素、策略和结果的标准化术语进行了组织。结果:48项研究分别为实施性研究(n=7)、决定性研究(n=8)、联合有效性和实施性研究或混合研究(n=33)。最常见的DSUI是一般药物使用的治疗和康复支持方法,最常以计算机上的电子程序提供。48项研究中只有12项使用了实施框架。很少描述执行战略。可接受性是评估最多的实施结果(n=26),没有研究评估实施成本。缺乏对患者层面实施决定因素和长期维持结果的评估。结论:为了加速转化和提高研究的严谨性,未来的DSUI研究应系统地应用实施科学框架来评估实施决定因素(包括患者层面),记录和测试实施策略,并评估结果,包括保真度、成本和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书