Reflections on the Development and Implementation of a University Student Health and Well-being Online Survey: the BOOST-Well Project.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2026-09-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.168558.4
Justin Keogh, Evelyne Rathbone, Wendy J Brown, Beth Mozolic-Staunton, Gregory Cox, James Furness, Jaclyn Szkwara
{"title":"Reflections on the Development and Implementation of a University Student Health and Well-being Online Survey: the BOOST-Well Project.","authors":"Justin Keogh, Evelyne Rathbone, Wendy J Brown, Beth Mozolic-Staunton, Gregory Cox, James Furness, Jaclyn Szkwara","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.168558.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>First year university students may be at risk of poor health behaviours and outcomes. Unfortunately, online surveys assessing multiple aspects of the health and well-being of university students have poor response rates, meaning the representativeness of such data may be questionable. This study sought to develop and implement an online survey to examine the health and well-being behaviours of medical and allied health students, with higher participation and response rate than have been reported in previous surveys.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was developed following recommendations to maximise the participation and response rates. All new students (defined as commencing a degree in May or September 2024) from undergraduate medical and postgraduate allied health programs from one Australian university were requested to participate. The survey included 136 items, most of which were validated questionnaires commonly used in national surveys. Participants were requested to complete the survey on their own device during scheduled class time within the first two weeks of their degree.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 273 eligible students, 217 (79.5%) accessed the survey, with 201 (73.6%) completing it at least partially and 63.7% completing it fully. Median completion time was 14.4 (IQR: 12.3-16.8) minutes, and item-level response rates were high across disciplines. Differences in completion rates and survey duration were observed, with occupational therapy students taking the longest time to complete the survey (17.4 min).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BOOST-Well survey achieved markedly higher response rates than comparable studies. This may reflect the student-informed survey design, concise format, strategic timing, and evidence-based recruitment and implementation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"808"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13616052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.168558.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: First year university students may be at risk of poor health behaviours and outcomes. Unfortunately, online surveys assessing multiple aspects of the health and well-being of university students have poor response rates, meaning the representativeness of such data may be questionable. This study sought to develop and implement an online survey to examine the health and well-being behaviours of medical and allied health students, with higher participation and response rate than have been reported in previous surveys.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was developed following recommendations to maximise the participation and response rates. All new students (defined as commencing a degree in May or September 2024) from undergraduate medical and postgraduate allied health programs from one Australian university were requested to participate. The survey included 136 items, most of which were validated questionnaires commonly used in national surveys. Participants were requested to complete the survey on their own device during scheduled class time within the first two weeks of their degree.

Results: Of 273 eligible students, 217 (79.5%) accessed the survey, with 201 (73.6%) completing it at least partially and 63.7% completing it fully. Median completion time was 14.4 (IQR: 12.3-16.8) minutes, and item-level response rates were high across disciplines. Differences in completion rates and survey duration were observed, with occupational therapy students taking the longest time to complete the survey (17.4 min).

Conclusions: The BOOST-Well survey achieved markedly higher response rates than comparable studies. This may reflect the student-informed survey design, concise format, strategic timing, and evidence-based recruitment and implementation strategies.

大学生健康与幸福在线调查的发展与实施:BOOST-Well项目。
背景:大学一年级学生可能存在不良健康行为和结果的风险。不幸的是,评估大学生健康和幸福的多个方面的在线调查的回复率很低,这意味着这些数据的代表性可能值得怀疑。本研究旨在开发和实施一项在线调查,以检查医学和相关卫生专业学生的健康和福祉行为,其参与率和回复率高于以前的调查报告。方法:根据建议进行横断面在线调查,以最大限度地提高参与率和回复率。所有来自澳大利亚一所大学的本科医学和研究生联合健康项目的新生(定义为2024年5月或9月开始攻读学位)都被要求参加。调查包括136个项目,其中大部分是国家调查中常用的有效问卷。参与者被要求在获得学位的前两周内,在预定的课堂时间内用自己的设备完成调查。结果:273名符合条件的学生中,217人(79.5%)参加了调查,201人(73.6%)至少完成了部分调查,63.7%的人完全完成了调查。中位完成时间为14.4分钟(IQR: 12.3-16.8),项目水平的反应率在各个学科中都很高。在完成率和调查时间上观察到差异,职业治疗学生花了最长的时间来完成调查(17.4分钟)。结论:与同类研究相比,BOOST-Well调查取得了明显更高的应答率。这可能反映了学生知情的调查设计,简洁的格式,战略性的时机,以及基于证据的招聘和实施策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书