Coronal microleakage of two intraorifice bioceramic barriers in single-rooted premolars: In vitro study.

Q2 Dentistry
Dental Research Journal Pub Date : 2026-09-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.4103/drj.drj_75_26
Saad Aslam, Heba Mohamed Abdelaal, Tarek M Elsewify, Bassem M Eid, Ranya F Elemam
{"title":"Coronal microleakage of two intraorifice bioceramic barriers in single-rooted premolars: <i>In vitro</i> study.","authors":"Saad Aslam, Heba Mohamed Abdelaal, Tarek M Elsewify, Bassem M Eid, Ranya F Elemam","doi":"10.4103/drj.drj_75_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronal microleakage compromises the longevity of root-filled teeth. Intra-orifice barriers are used to reduce coronal ingress, but comparative performance among bioceramics remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the coronal microleakage of two bioceramic materials, NeoPutty and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Plus, used as intraorifice barriers in extracted human single-rooted premolars.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized controlled <i>in vitro</i> experimental study included 50 extracted human single-rooted premolars, which were randomly allocated into four groups: two experimental groups (NeoPutty and MTA Plus; <i>n</i> = 20 each) and two control groups (positive and negative controls; <i>n</i> = 5 each). Following root canal preparation and obturation, intraorifice barriers were placed, and the samples were immersed in Rhodamine B dye for 48 h. The teeth were then sectioned buccolingually, and dye penetration was observed under a stereomicroscope (×16). Data were analyzed using an independent samples <i>t</i>-test with a significance level of <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean dye penetration with standard deviation (SD) was 5.49 (1.72) mm for NeoPutty and 5.21 (1.11) mm for MTA Plus; the difference was not statistically significant (NeoPutty - MTA Plus = 0.275 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.651-1.201; <i>t</i> = 0.60; <i>P</i> = 0.55).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both NeoPutty and MTA Plus showed similar coronal sealing effectiveness as intraorifice barriers in premolars. These results support the use of either material to enhance the coronal seal. Further studies incorporating aging protocols and alternative leakage models are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"23 ","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13619104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/drj.drj_75_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronal microleakage compromises the longevity of root-filled teeth. Intra-orifice barriers are used to reduce coronal ingress, but comparative performance among bioceramics remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the coronal microleakage of two bioceramic materials, NeoPutty and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Plus, used as intraorifice barriers in extracted human single-rooted premolars.

Materials and methods: This randomized controlled in vitro experimental study included 50 extracted human single-rooted premolars, which were randomly allocated into four groups: two experimental groups (NeoPutty and MTA Plus; n = 20 each) and two control groups (positive and negative controls; n = 5 each). Following root canal preparation and obturation, intraorifice barriers were placed, and the samples were immersed in Rhodamine B dye for 48 h. The teeth were then sectioned buccolingually, and dye penetration was observed under a stereomicroscope (×16). Data were analyzed using an independent samples t-test with a significance level of P < 0.05.

Results: The mean dye penetration with standard deviation (SD) was 5.49 (1.72) mm for NeoPutty and 5.21 (1.11) mm for MTA Plus; the difference was not statistically significant (NeoPutty - MTA Plus = 0.275 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.651-1.201; t = 0.60; P = 0.55).

Conclusion: Both NeoPutty and MTA Plus showed similar coronal sealing effectiveness as intraorifice barriers in premolars. These results support the use of either material to enhance the coronal seal. Further studies incorporating aging protocols and alternative leakage models are recommended.

单根前磨牙两个孔内生物陶瓷屏障冠状面微渗漏的体外研究。
背景:冠状微渗漏影响补根牙的寿命。孔内屏障用于减少冠状动脉侵入,但生物陶瓷的比较性能仍然不确定。本研究旨在评估两种生物陶瓷材料NeoPutty和mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Plus作为人类拔牙单根前磨牙孔内屏障的冠状微渗漏。材料与方法:本实验采用随机对照体外实验方法,选取50颗提取的人单根前磨牙,随机分为4组:实验组NeoPutty和MTA Plus各20颗,对照组阳性对照和阴性对照各5颗。在根管准备和封闭后,放置孔内屏障,将样品浸入罗丹明B染料中48小时。然后对牙齿进行口腔切片,在体视显微镜下观察染料渗透情况(×16)。数据分析采用独立样本t检验,显著性水平P < 0.05。结果:NeoPutty和MTA Plus的平均染色渗透标准偏差(SD)分别为5.49 (1.72)mm和5.21 (1.11)mm;差异无统计学意义(NeoPutty - MTA Plus = 0.275 mm; 95%置信区间[CI], -0.651-1.201; t = 0.60; P = 0.55)。结论:neopty和MTA Plus作为前磨牙口内屏障的冠状封闭效果相似。这些结果支持使用任何一种材料来增强冠状动脉密封。建议进一步研究纳入老化协议和替代泄漏模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dental Research Journal
Dental Research Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Dental Research Journal, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.drjjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Dentistry. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书