Lipoprotein and apolipoprotein levels in age-related macular degeneration: A meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Vasiliki Arsoudi, Thomas Chontos, Spyridon Voutsas, Petros Petrou, Konstantinos Tyrlis, Ioannis Karavidas, Stylianos A Kandarakis, Stefania Chondrou, Smaragda Diamanti, Constantine D Angelidis, Ilias Georgalas
{"title":"Lipoprotein and apolipoprotein levels in age-related macular degeneration: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Vasiliki Arsoudi, Thomas Chontos, Spyridon Voutsas, Petros Petrou, Konstantinos Tyrlis, Ioannis Karavidas, Stylianos A Kandarakis, Stefania Chondrou, Smaragda Diamanti, Constantine D Angelidis, Ilias Georgalas","doi":"10.1177/11206721261492347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeDrusen, the hallmark of AMD, are lipoprotein-rich particles. However, the role of systemic lipid metabolism in their formation remains controversial. This meta-analysis explored the association between ApoA1, ApoA2, ApoB and Lp(a) serum levels and AMD.MethodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Scopus for relevant studies. WMD meta-analyses were performed for ApoA1 and ApoB, whereas SMD meta-analyses were conducted for ApoA2 and Lp(a) serum levels in AMD patients vs healthy controls.ResultsA total of 11 studies with 5,084 subjects for ApoA1, 4,179 for ApoB, 3,177 for ApoA2 and 3,228 for Lp(a) were included. No significant differences were observed between AMD patients (all subtypes) and controls for serum ApoA1 (WMD = 0.29 mg/dL, -3.75 to 4.32, p = 0.89), ApoB (WMD = -2.16 mg/dL, -5.67 to 1.34, p = 0.23), or Lp(a) (g: -0.14, -0.54 to 0.27, p = 0.50). ApoA2 was significantly different (g = 0.2, 0.07 to 0.34, p = 0.003). In severe AMD (geographic atrophy, neovascular AMD), meta-analysis revealed no significant difference for ApoA1 (WMD = -2.68 mg/dL, -8.87 to 3.52, p = 0.4) or ApoB (WMD = -0.42 mg/dL, -6.20 to 5.32, p = 0.89).ConclusionThis meta-analysis discovered no meaningful association between systemic levels of ApoA1, ApoB, or Lp(a) and the presence or severity of AMD. Despite a significant change in ApoA2, utilizing a Reference Change Value based interpretation, we conclude that observed differences in analyzed markers represent physiological and analytical noise rather than true biological change. Our findings suggest that systemic ApoA1, ApoB, and Lp(a) levels are not elevated in individuals with AMD, though the potential role of ApoA2 warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"11206721261492347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721261492347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeDrusen, the hallmark of AMD, are lipoprotein-rich particles. However, the role of systemic lipid metabolism in their formation remains controversial. This meta-analysis explored the association between ApoA1, ApoA2, ApoB and Lp(a) serum levels and AMD.MethodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Scopus for relevant studies. WMD meta-analyses were performed for ApoA1 and ApoB, whereas SMD meta-analyses were conducted for ApoA2 and Lp(a) serum levels in AMD patients vs healthy controls.ResultsA total of 11 studies with 5,084 subjects for ApoA1, 4,179 for ApoB, 3,177 for ApoA2 and 3,228 for Lp(a) were included. No significant differences were observed between AMD patients (all subtypes) and controls for serum ApoA1 (WMD = 0.29 mg/dL, -3.75 to 4.32, p = 0.89), ApoB (WMD = -2.16 mg/dL, -5.67 to 1.34, p = 0.23), or Lp(a) (g: -0.14, -0.54 to 0.27, p = 0.50). ApoA2 was significantly different (g = 0.2, 0.07 to 0.34, p = 0.003). In severe AMD (geographic atrophy, neovascular AMD), meta-analysis revealed no significant difference for ApoA1 (WMD = -2.68 mg/dL, -8.87 to 3.52, p = 0.4) or ApoB (WMD = -0.42 mg/dL, -6.20 to 5.32, p = 0.89).ConclusionThis meta-analysis discovered no meaningful association between systemic levels of ApoA1, ApoB, or Lp(a) and the presence or severity of AMD. Despite a significant change in ApoA2, utilizing a Reference Change Value based interpretation, we conclude that observed differences in analyzed markers represent physiological and analytical noise rather than true biological change. Our findings suggest that systemic ApoA1, ApoB, and Lp(a) levels are not elevated in individuals with AMD, though the potential role of ApoA2 warrants further investigation.

年龄相关性黄斑变性的脂蛋白和载脂蛋白水平:一项荟萃分析。
目的:黄斑变性的标志蛋白是富含脂蛋白的颗粒。然而,系统脂质代谢在其形成中的作用仍然存在争议。这项荟萃分析探讨了ApoA1、ApoA2、ApoB和Lp(a)血清水平与AMD之间的关系。方法系统检索MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、EMBASE、Scopus等相关文献。对ApoA1和ApoB进行WMD荟萃分析,而对AMD患者与健康对照组的ApoA2和Lp(a)血清水平进行SMD荟萃分析。结果共纳入11项研究,包括5084例ApoA1、4179例ApoB、3177例ApoA2和3228例Lp(a)。AMD患者(所有亚型)与对照组血清ApoA1 (WMD = 0.29 mg/dL, -3.75 ~ 4.32, p = 0.89)、ApoB (WMD = -2.16 mg/dL, -5.67 ~ 1.34, p = 0.23)或Lp(a) (g: -0.14, -0.54 ~ 0.27, p = 0.50)无显著差异。ApoA2差异有统计学意义(g = 0.2, 0.07 ~ 0.34, p = 0.003)。在严重AMD(地理萎缩,新生血管性AMD)中,meta分析显示ApoA1 (WMD = -2.68 mg/dL, -8.87至3.52,p = 0.4)或ApoB (WMD = -0.42 mg/dL, -6.20至5.32,p = 0.89)无显著差异。该荟萃分析发现,全身ApoA1、ApoB或Lp(a)水平与AMD的存在或严重程度之间没有显著相关性。尽管ApoA2发生了显著变化,但利用基于参考变化值的解释,我们得出结论,在所分析的标记物中观察到的差异代表了生理和分析噪声,而不是真正的生物学变化。我们的研究结果表明,尽管ApoA2的潜在作用有待进一步研究,但AMD患者的系统性ApoA1、ApoB和Lp(a)水平并未升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书