Optimizing flexible and navigable ureteral access sheaths (FANS) manoeuvrability: the impact of sheath size, working channel occupancy and deflection technique - an EAU endourology in vitro analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Vineet Gauhar, Alex Qinyang Liu, Ivan Ching Ho Ko, Yuen Hei Chung, Jia-Lun Kwok, Chi-Ho Leung, David Ka-Wai Leung, Francis Chun Him Wong, Joseph Kai Man Li, Hoi Chak Chan, Yi Quan Tan, Arman Tsaturyan, Bhaskar Somani, Chi-Fai Ng
{"title":"Optimizing flexible and navigable ureteral access sheaths (FANS) manoeuvrability: the impact of sheath size, working channel occupancy and deflection technique - an EAU endourology in vitro analysis.","authors":"Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Vineet Gauhar, Alex Qinyang Liu, Ivan Ching Ho Ko, Yuen Hei Chung, Jia-Lun Kwok, Chi-Ho Leung, David Ka-Wai Leung, Francis Chun Him Wong, Joseph Kai Man Li, Hoi Chak Chan, Yi Quan Tan, Arman Tsaturyan, Bhaskar Somani, Chi-Fai Ng","doi":"10.1186/s12894-026-02281-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conventional ureteral access sheaths are placed below the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ), whereas the novel flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS) are navigated across the UPJ with its distal tip deflected into target calyx under endoscopic guidance to facilitate stone fragments suctioning. We evaluate how FANS deflection angles are affected by sheath sizes, occupancy of working channel (WC) (empty, occupied by Olympus Soltive™ Thulium Laser Fiber 150 μm and 200 μm core diameter) and deflection techniques (ureteroscope deflection versus sheath advancement) across four brands of FANS.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>In-vitro deflection angles of brand new FANS (sheath sizes 10/12Fr, 11/13Fr and 12/14Fr) ClearPetra (Well Lead Medical Co., Ltd, China) 46 cm, Elephant II (YiGao Medical Technology Co., Ltd, China) 50 cm, Innovex (Innovex Medical Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) 50 cm, and Reborn (Hunan Reborn Medical Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd, China) 50 cm with brand new single-use flexible ureteroscope Pusen Uscope 7.5Fr PU3033A (Zhuhai Pusen Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Guangzhou, China) were measured in triplicate with varied WC occupancy and forementioned techniques. Maximum deflection angle was expressed as a mean of 3 measurements. One-way ANOVA test was performed for comparisons of the effect of sheath sizes, sheath brands, working channel occupancy, and different deflection techniques. Four-way ANOVA test was performed to evaluate the influence of the aforementioned four factors on the maximal deflection angle, with analysis on the main effects and interaction. For all tests, a two-sided p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical tests were performed with SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>10/12Fr and 11/13Fr sheath sizes have significantly better deflection angles than 12/14Fr across all brands with a 7.5Fr flexible ureteroscope. Sheath advancement technique was significantly better with ureteroscope deflection technique. There is no significant difference in deflection angles with occupancy of 150-200 μm fiber.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gaining better understanding of the performance of FANS can ultimately guide clinicians in their selection and optimal utilization of the instrument to enhance procedural efficacy and treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-026-02281-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Conventional ureteral access sheaths are placed below the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ), whereas the novel flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS) are navigated across the UPJ with its distal tip deflected into target calyx under endoscopic guidance to facilitate stone fragments suctioning. We evaluate how FANS deflection angles are affected by sheath sizes, occupancy of working channel (WC) (empty, occupied by Olympus Soltive™ Thulium Laser Fiber 150 μm and 200 μm core diameter) and deflection techniques (ureteroscope deflection versus sheath advancement) across four brands of FANS.

Materials & methods: In-vitro deflection angles of brand new FANS (sheath sizes 10/12Fr, 11/13Fr and 12/14Fr) ClearPetra (Well Lead Medical Co., Ltd, China) 46 cm, Elephant II (YiGao Medical Technology Co., Ltd, China) 50 cm, Innovex (Innovex Medical Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) 50 cm, and Reborn (Hunan Reborn Medical Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd, China) 50 cm with brand new single-use flexible ureteroscope Pusen Uscope 7.5Fr PU3033A (Zhuhai Pusen Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Guangzhou, China) were measured in triplicate with varied WC occupancy and forementioned techniques. Maximum deflection angle was expressed as a mean of 3 measurements. One-way ANOVA test was performed for comparisons of the effect of sheath sizes, sheath brands, working channel occupancy, and different deflection techniques. Four-way ANOVA test was performed to evaluate the influence of the aforementioned four factors on the maximal deflection angle, with analysis on the main effects and interaction. For all tests, a two-sided p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical tests were performed with SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results: 10/12Fr and 11/13Fr sheath sizes have significantly better deflection angles than 12/14Fr across all brands with a 7.5Fr flexible ureteroscope. Sheath advancement technique was significantly better with ureteroscope deflection technique. There is no significant difference in deflection angles with occupancy of 150-200 μm fiber.

Conclusion: Gaining better understanding of the performance of FANS can ultimately guide clinicians in their selection and optimal utilization of the instrument to enhance procedural efficacy and treatment outcomes.

优化灵活和可导航输尿管通路鞘(FANS)的可操作性:鞘大小,工作通道占用和偏转技术的影响-一项EAU泌尿系统体外分析。
导读:传统输尿管通路鞘位于肾盂输尿管连接处(UPJ)下方,而新型灵活且可导航的吸力输尿管通路鞘(FANS)在内镜引导下穿过UPJ,其远端末端偏转到目标肾盂,以促进结石碎片的吸引。我们评估了四个品牌FANS的护套尺寸、工作通道占用(WC)(空的,由Olympus Soltive™铥激光光纤150 μm和200 μm芯径占用)和偏转技术(输尿管镜偏转与护套推进)对FANS偏转角度的影响。材料与方法:全新FANS(护套尺寸分别为10/12Fr、11/13Fr和12/14Fr) ClearPetra(中国Well Lead医疗有限公司)46 cm、Elephant II(中国一高医疗科技有限公司)50 cm、Innovex(中国上海Innovex医疗有限公司)50 cm、Reborn(中国湖南Reborn医疗科技发展有限公司)50 cm、全新一次性柔性输尿管镜Pusen Uscope 7.5Fr PU3033A(珠海普森医疗科技有限公司)用不同的WC占用率和上述技术进行了三次测量。最大偏转角度表示为3次测量的平均值。采用单因素方差分析比较护套尺寸、护套品牌、工作通道占用和不同偏转技术的影响。采用四因素方差分析评价上述四个因素对最大偏转角的影响,并分析其主效应和交互作用。对于所有检验,双侧p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。采用SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA)进行统计检验。结果:在所有品牌的7.5Fr柔性输尿管镜中,10/12Fr和11/13Fr护套尺寸的偏转角度明显优于12/14Fr。输尿管镜偏转技术与鞘部推进技术相比效果明显更好。占用150 ~ 200 μm光纤时,偏转角度无显著差异。结论:更好地了解FANS的性能,最终可以指导临床医生选择和优化使用FANS,以提高手术疗效和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书