Risk factors for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an umbrella review of meta-analyses and mendelian randomization analyses.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Huanrong Ruan, Siyuan Lei, Jun Wang, Hulei Zhao, Xuezhong Zhou, Jiansheng Li
{"title":"Risk factors for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an umbrella review of meta-analyses and mendelian randomization analyses.","authors":"Huanrong Ruan, Siyuan Lei, Jun Wang, Hulei Zhao, Xuezhong Zhou, Jiansheng Li","doi":"10.1186/s12890-026-04519-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is rising globally. Existing meta-analyses and Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have yielded inconsistent findings with uncertain evidence quality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to synthesize available evidence and assess its credibility for potential risk factors of IPF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched 8 databases and selected meta-analyses and MR studies related to IPF risk factors from inception to March 11, 2025. We assessed the quality of meta-analyses using the AMSTAR-2 tool and evaluated MR studies using the STROBE-MR guidelines. We categorized the evidence into four levels and performed pooled analysis for risk factors reported in at least two MR studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 meta-analyses were included, reporting 22 associations, mainly involving genetics, infections, occupational and environmental exposures, lifestyle, and clinical variables. According to the grading of evidence credibility, 12 were rated as suggestive associations, and 10 as weak associations. The overall credibility of the evidence is relatively low. The 36 MR studies investigated a total of 124 associations, with evidence grading showed 13 as robust, 90 as possible, 17 as suggestive, and 4 as insufficient. The pooled analysis identified 108 associations covering lifestyle, diet and nutrition, anthropometric indices, biomarkers, and clinical variables. The quality level of the included meta-analyses was low and critically low, while the MR studies strictly adhered to STROBE-MR, demonstrating good reporting quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This umbrella review uncovers the evidence regarding the associations between IPF risk and factors such as genetics, viral infections, occupational and environmental exposures, lifestyle, and clinical variables through a comprehensive analysis of meta-analyses and MR studies. These findings provide an evidence base for IPF risk factor research and support clinical decisions and public health strategies.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024575341.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13617888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-026-04519-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is rising globally. Existing meta-analyses and Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have yielded inconsistent findings with uncertain evidence quality.

Objectives: This study aimed to synthesize available evidence and assess its credibility for potential risk factors of IPF.

Methods: We systematically searched 8 databases and selected meta-analyses and MR studies related to IPF risk factors from inception to March 11, 2025. We assessed the quality of meta-analyses using the AMSTAR-2 tool and evaluated MR studies using the STROBE-MR guidelines. We categorized the evidence into four levels and performed pooled analysis for risk factors reported in at least two MR studies.

Results: A total of 8 meta-analyses were included, reporting 22 associations, mainly involving genetics, infections, occupational and environmental exposures, lifestyle, and clinical variables. According to the grading of evidence credibility, 12 were rated as suggestive associations, and 10 as weak associations. The overall credibility of the evidence is relatively low. The 36 MR studies investigated a total of 124 associations, with evidence grading showed 13 as robust, 90 as possible, 17 as suggestive, and 4 as insufficient. The pooled analysis identified 108 associations covering lifestyle, diet and nutrition, anthropometric indices, biomarkers, and clinical variables. The quality level of the included meta-analyses was low and critically low, while the MR studies strictly adhered to STROBE-MR, demonstrating good reporting quality.

Conclusions: This umbrella review uncovers the evidence regarding the associations between IPF risk and factors such as genetics, viral infections, occupational and environmental exposures, lifestyle, and clinical variables through a comprehensive analysis of meta-analyses and MR studies. These findings provide an evidence base for IPF risk factor research and support clinical decisions and public health strategies.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024575341.

特发性肺纤维化的危险因素:荟萃分析和孟德尔随机化分析的综述。
背景:特发性肺纤维化(IPF)的发病率在全球范围内呈上升趋势。现有的荟萃分析和孟德尔随机化(MR)研究得出的结果不一致,证据质量不确定。目的:本研究旨在综合现有证据并评估其对IPF潜在危险因素的可信度。方法:我们系统地检索了8个数据库,并选择了从成立到2025年3月11日与IPF危险因素相关的meta分析和MR研究。我们使用AMSTAR-2工具评估meta分析的质量,并使用STROBE-MR指南评估MR研究。我们将证据分为四个级别,并对至少两项MR研究中报告的危险因素进行了汇总分析。结果:共纳入8项荟萃分析,报告了22种关联,主要涉及遗传、感染、职业和环境暴露、生活方式和临床变量。根据证据可信度的分级,12个被评为提示关联,10个被评为弱关联。证据的整体可信度相对较低。36项MR研究共调查了124项关联,证据分级显示13项为有力,90项为尽可能,17项为暗示,4项为不充分。汇总分析确定了108种关联,包括生活方式、饮食和营养、人体测量指数、生物标志物和临床变量。纳入的meta分析的质量水平较低且极低,而MR研究严格遵守STROBE-MR,显示出良好的报告质量。结论:本综述通过荟萃分析和磁共振研究的综合分析,揭示了IPF风险与遗传、病毒感染、职业和环境暴露、生活方式和临床变量等因素之间关联的证据。这些发现为IPF风险因素研究提供了证据基础,并为临床决策和公共卫生战略提供了支持。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024575341。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书