TransUNet-GradCAM: a hybrid transformer-U-Net with self-attention and explainable visualizations for foot ulcer segmentation.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Akwasi Asare, Mary Sagoe, Justice Williams Asare, Stephen E Moore
{"title":"TransUNet-GradCAM: a hybrid transformer-U-Net with self-attention and explainable visualizations for foot ulcer segmentation.","authors":"Akwasi Asare, Mary Sagoe, Justice Williams Asare, Stephen E Moore","doi":"10.1186/s12880-026-02793-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Automated segmentation of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) supports clinical diagnosis, treatment planning, and longitudinal wound monitoring, but remains difficult owing to the heterogeneous appearance, irregular morphology, and cluttered backgrounds of ulcers in clinical photographs. Convolutional networks such as U-Net localise well but model long-range context poorly, whereas Vision Transformers capture global dependencies. We employ a hybrid ViT-bottleneck U-Net that combines a convolutional encoder-decoder with a Transformer bottleneck and attention-gated skip connections, and we emphasise that the contribution is a rigorously validated and explainable application rather than a new architecture. The model was trained on the public Foot Ulcer Segmentation Challenge (FUSeg) dataset with a hybrid Dice and cross-entropy loss, and all results are reported over five seeds as mean ± 95% confidence interval at a single fixed threshold. On the internal validation set it achieved a Dice of 0.8035 ± 0.0053 and an IoU of 0.7149 ± 0.0073 (HD95 = 19.74 px, ASSD = 6.12 px). A component-wise ablation showed that only the hybrid loss produced a statistically significant change in Dice (- 0.038, p < 0.001); the Transformer bottleneck, attention gates, and augmentation each had small, non-significant in-domain effects. External validation without retraining retained about 92% of internal Dice on the Advancing the Zenith of Healthcare (AZH) Wound Care Center cohort (Dice 0.7460, n = 278), while a small Medetec subset (n = 8) served only as a qualitative check, indicating partial rather than robust generalisation under domain shift. A quantitative explainability analysis found Grad-CAM more wound-localised (energy-in-mask 0.871 versus 0.102) but attention rollout significantly more faithful (p = 0.038, n = 200), showing the two are complementary. Predicted and expert wound areas agreed strongly (Pearson r = 0.944), and the model is lightweight (8.79 M parameters).</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02793-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automated segmentation of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) supports clinical diagnosis, treatment planning, and longitudinal wound monitoring, but remains difficult owing to the heterogeneous appearance, irregular morphology, and cluttered backgrounds of ulcers in clinical photographs. Convolutional networks such as U-Net localise well but model long-range context poorly, whereas Vision Transformers capture global dependencies. We employ a hybrid ViT-bottleneck U-Net that combines a convolutional encoder-decoder with a Transformer bottleneck and attention-gated skip connections, and we emphasise that the contribution is a rigorously validated and explainable application rather than a new architecture. The model was trained on the public Foot Ulcer Segmentation Challenge (FUSeg) dataset with a hybrid Dice and cross-entropy loss, and all results are reported over five seeds as mean ± 95% confidence interval at a single fixed threshold. On the internal validation set it achieved a Dice of 0.8035 ± 0.0053 and an IoU of 0.7149 ± 0.0073 (HD95 = 19.74 px, ASSD = 6.12 px). A component-wise ablation showed that only the hybrid loss produced a statistically significant change in Dice (- 0.038, p < 0.001); the Transformer bottleneck, attention gates, and augmentation each had small, non-significant in-domain effects. External validation without retraining retained about 92% of internal Dice on the Advancing the Zenith of Healthcare (AZH) Wound Care Center cohort (Dice 0.7460, n = 278), while a small Medetec subset (n = 8) served only as a qualitative check, indicating partial rather than robust generalisation under domain shift. A quantitative explainability analysis found Grad-CAM more wound-localised (energy-in-mask 0.871 versus 0.102) but attention rollout significantly more faithful (p = 0.038, n = 200), showing the two are complementary. Predicted and expert wound areas agreed strongly (Pearson r = 0.944), and the model is lightweight (8.79 M parameters).

TransUNet-GradCAM:一种混合变压器- u - net,具有自我关注和可解释的足溃疡分割可视化。
糖尿病足溃疡的自动分割(DFUs)支持临床诊断、治疗计划和纵向伤口监测,但由于临床照片中溃疡的异质外观、不规则形态和杂乱背景,仍然很困难。像U-Net这样的卷积网络可以很好地定位,但对长期上下文的建模很差,而视觉变形器则可以捕获全局依赖关系。我们采用了一种混合的vit -瓶颈U-Net,它结合了卷积编码器-解码器、变压器瓶颈和注意力门控跳过连接,我们强调其贡献是一个经过严格验证和可解释的应用程序,而不是一个新的架构。该模型在公共足溃疡分割挑战(FUSeg)数据集上使用混合Dice和交叉熵损失进行训练,所有结果在单个固定阈值下以平均±95%的置信区间报告。在内部验证集上,它实现了Dice为0.8035±0.0053,IoU为0.7149±0.0073 (HD95 = 19.74 px, ASSD = 6.12 px)。组分消融显示,只有杂交损失才会产生统计学上显著的Dice变化(- 0.038,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书