Establishing Consensus for Prescription of Prosthetic Components for Transtibial Bone-Anchored Limbs: An International Delphi Method Study.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Eric J Earley, Dan W Milius, Mohamed E Awad, Danielle H Melton, Kirstin Ahmed, Ruud A Leijendekkers, Benjamin K Potter, Phillip M Stevens, Brecca M M Gaffney, Cory L Christiansen, Jason W Stoneback
{"title":"Establishing Consensus for Prescription of Prosthetic Components for Transtibial Bone-Anchored Limbs: An International Delphi Method Study.","authors":"Eric J Earley, Dan W Milius, Mohamed E Awad, Danielle H Melton, Kirstin Ahmed, Ruud A Leijendekkers, Benjamin K Potter, Phillip M Stevens, Brecca M M Gaffney, Cory L Christiansen, Jason W Stoneback","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2026.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Establish consensus and provide recommendations from international experts on the prescription of prosthetic components for patients with transtibial bone-anchored limbs (BALs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Delphi method study comprising 3 rounds of surveys between November 2023 and September 2024.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Anonymous online surveys distributed to international Delegates.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Clinicians (N=10) with expertise in longitudinal prosthetic care for patients with BAL.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Delegate agreement of at least 80% to establish consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight thematic statements achieved consensus. Delegates unanimously agreed with prescribing an appropriate safety connector, a torque absorber, and a high-energy return or compliant carbon fiber or fiberglass foot with a split toe, and also agreed with the prioritization of torsion absorption over shock absorption if necessary. Delegates generally agreed that sex, age, and body mass index should not change the prosthesis component prescription, but that physical ability and desired functional activities may necessitate different components. Other findings highlighted areas of uncertainty among experts, such as the ability of the anatomical knee and the prosthetic foot to provide torsion and shock absorption, respectively, in place of a separate prosthetic component. Delegates also strongly agreed on the need for safety connectors protecting against high coronal and sagittal loads in transtibial BAL, a finding not reflected in recommendations for transfemoral BAL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The recommendations generated from this study provide a starting point to guide clinicians when selecting prosthetic components for patients with transtibial BAL and serve as a basis for structuring future clinical practice guidelines. Furthermore, the proposed themes may aid in identifying knowledge gaps and direct future research studies on safety and functional improvements with BAL.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2026.09.015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Establish consensus and provide recommendations from international experts on the prescription of prosthetic components for patients with transtibial bone-anchored limbs (BALs).

Design: Delphi method study comprising 3 rounds of surveys between November 2023 and September 2024.

Setting: Anonymous online surveys distributed to international Delegates.

Participants: Clinicians (N=10) with expertise in longitudinal prosthetic care for patients with BAL.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Delegate agreement of at least 80% to establish consensus.

Results: Twenty-eight thematic statements achieved consensus. Delegates unanimously agreed with prescribing an appropriate safety connector, a torque absorber, and a high-energy return or compliant carbon fiber or fiberglass foot with a split toe, and also agreed with the prioritization of torsion absorption over shock absorption if necessary. Delegates generally agreed that sex, age, and body mass index should not change the prosthesis component prescription, but that physical ability and desired functional activities may necessitate different components. Other findings highlighted areas of uncertainty among experts, such as the ability of the anatomical knee and the prosthetic foot to provide torsion and shock absorption, respectively, in place of a separate prosthetic component. Delegates also strongly agreed on the need for safety connectors protecting against high coronal and sagittal loads in transtibial BAL, a finding not reflected in recommendations for transfemoral BAL.

Conclusions: The recommendations generated from this study provide a starting point to guide clinicians when selecting prosthetic components for patients with transtibial BAL and serve as a basis for structuring future clinical practice guidelines. Furthermore, the proposed themes may aid in identifying knowledge gaps and direct future research studies on safety and functional improvements with BAL.

建立经胫骨骨锚定肢体假体成分处方共识:国际德尔菲法研究。
目的:就经胫骨骨锚定肢体(BAL)患者的假体成分处方建立共识并提供国际专家的建议。设计:德尔菲法研究,包括2023年11月至2024年9月的三轮调查。设置:向国际代表分发匿名在线调查。参与者:多达10名具有BAL患者纵向假体护理专业知识的临床医生。干预措施:不适用。主要成果衡量标准:至少80%的代表同意建立共识。结果:28个专题发言达成协商一致意见。代表们一致同意规定一个适当的安全连接器,一个扭矩吸收器,一个高能量返回或兼容的碳纤维或玻璃纤维脚与分裂脚趾,也同意在必要时,扭转吸收比减震吸收优先。代表们普遍认为,性别、年龄和BMI不应改变假体成分处方,但身体能力和期望的功能活动可能需要不同的成分。其他研究结果强调了专家们的不确定性,例如解剖膝盖和假脚分别提供扭转和减震的能力,以取代单独的假体部件。代表们还强烈同意在经胫骨BAL中需要安全连接器来防止高冠状面和矢状面负荷,这一发现没有反映在经股骨BAL的推荐中。结论:本研究提出的建议为临床医生选择经胫骨BAL患者的假体部件提供了一个起点,并可作为构建未来临床实践指南的基础。此外,提出的主题可能有助于确定知识差距,并指导未来关于BAL安全性和功能改进的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书