Interpretable machine learning models for predicting tocilizumab response in rheumatoid arthritis using clinical data.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Mengsi Ma, Xinya Chen, Xue Wu, Chen Chen, Zhuoyu Li, Qianxi Xu, Ziyang Zhang, JinChao Chen, Zhenyang Guan, Xinming Feng, Xiangcao Liang, Wentao Qin, Lijun Wu
{"title":"Interpretable machine learning models for predicting tocilizumab response in rheumatoid arthritis using clinical data.","authors":"Mengsi Ma, Xinya Chen, Xue Wu, Chen Chen, Zhuoyu Li, Qianxi Xu, Ziyang Zhang, JinChao Chen, Zhenyang Guan, Xinming Feng, Xiangcao Liang, Wentao Qin, Lijun Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12911-026-03486-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 30% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) do not respond to tocilizumab (TCZ). This study aimed to predict TCZ response using machine learning models trained on clinical data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline and follow-up data from patients with RA treated with TCZ were collected. Seven different machine learning models (logistic regression, K-nearest neighbor algorithm, random forest, support vector machine, decision tree, gradient boosting, and boosting algorithm) were trained to predict the treatment response of patients with RA across different imaging stages after three to six months of therapy. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was the main performance evaluation feature to screen the best model, and the relative importance of each variable in the model was ranked using the Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 245 RA patients treated with TCZ were included. The logistic regression model demonstrated superior prediction performance across imaging stages, achieving AUC scores of 0.78 for patients without imaging changes, 0.73 for stage I, and 0.82 for stages II, III, and IV. Key features influencing predictions varied by imaging stage. The most important features were D-dimer concentration for patients without imaging changes, DAS28 grade for patients in stage I, and the physician's overall disease score (EGA) for patients in stages II, III, and IV, with SHAP values of 0.5180, 0.6661, and 1.3978, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the potential of machine learning to predict TCZ treatment outcomes and identify stage-specific features in patients with RA.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-026-03486-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Approximately 30% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) do not respond to tocilizumab (TCZ). This study aimed to predict TCZ response using machine learning models trained on clinical data.

Methods: Baseline and follow-up data from patients with RA treated with TCZ were collected. Seven different machine learning models (logistic regression, K-nearest neighbor algorithm, random forest, support vector machine, decision tree, gradient boosting, and boosting algorithm) were trained to predict the treatment response of patients with RA across different imaging stages after three to six months of therapy. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was the main performance evaluation feature to screen the best model, and the relative importance of each variable in the model was ranked using the Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) value.

Results: A total of 245 RA patients treated with TCZ were included. The logistic regression model demonstrated superior prediction performance across imaging stages, achieving AUC scores of 0.78 for patients without imaging changes, 0.73 for stage I, and 0.82 for stages II, III, and IV. Key features influencing predictions varied by imaging stage. The most important features were D-dimer concentration for patients without imaging changes, DAS28 grade for patients in stage I, and the physician's overall disease score (EGA) for patients in stages II, III, and IV, with SHAP values of 0.5180, 0.6661, and 1.3978, respectively.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of machine learning to predict TCZ treatment outcomes and identify stage-specific features in patients with RA.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

使用临床数据预测tocilizumab对类风湿关节炎反应的可解释机器学习模型。
背景:大约30%的类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者对托珠单抗(TCZ)没有反应。本研究旨在利用临床数据训练的机器学习模型来预测TCZ的反应。方法:收集中药治疗RA患者的基线和随访资料。7种不同的机器学习模型(逻辑回归、k近邻算法、随机森林、支持向量机、决策树、梯度增强和增强算法)被训练来预测RA患者在治疗3至6个月后不同成像阶段的治疗反应。受试者工作曲线下面积(AUC)是筛选最佳模型的主要性能评价特征,采用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)值对模型中各变量的相对重要性进行排序。结果:共纳入245例经TCZ治疗的RA患者。逻辑回归模型显示出跨影像分期的卓越预测性能,无影像改变患者的AUC评分为0.78,I期为0.73,II、III和IV期为0.82。影响预测的关键特征因影像分期而异。最重要的特征是无影像学改变患者的d -二聚体浓度,ⅰ期患者的DAS28分级,ⅱ、ⅲ、ⅳ期患者的医师总体疾病评分(EGA),其SHAP值分别为0.5180、0.6661、1.3978。结论:这项研究证明了机器学习在预测TCZ治疗结果和识别RA患者分期特异性特征方面的潜力。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书