Conceptual Evolution and Research Focus of Narrative Competence in Healthcare Professionals:CiteSpace-Based Knowledge Mapping.

Q4 Medicine
Yu-Ling Qiao, Xue-Jing Quan, Jing Su, Li-Ping Guo
{"title":"Conceptual Evolution and Research Focus of Narrative Competence in Healthcare Professionals:CiteSpace-Based Knowledge Mapping.","authors":"Yu-Ling Qiao, Xue-Jing Quan, Jing Su, Li-Ping Guo","doi":"10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.17452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective To systematically review the conceptual evolution and research focus of narrative competence among healthcare professionals and to reveal the differences and complementary relationships between Chinese and English articles. Methods CiteSpace-based knowledge mapping was conducted on the articles related to narrative competence published between 2001 and 2025,including 103 articles from four major English databases (PubMed,Web of Science Core Collection,APA PsycINFO,and CINAHL) and 186 articles from three major Chinese databases (CNKI,Wanfang Data,and VIP).Keyword co-occurrence analysis was performed to identify research hotspots,and cluster analysis to reveal differences in research orientations between English and Chinese articles.Keyword bursts were detected to track the temporal trajectory of conceptual evolution. Results The concept of narrative competence shows a trend of evolving from abstract humanistic ideas to concrete clinical competencies.English articles focus more on theoretical construction and humanistic connotations,while Chinese articles emphasize application and operability,translating narrative competence into measurable core abilities. Conclusions The development of narrative competence follows a trajectory of \"meta-concept-dimensionalization-operationalization framework\".English and Chinese articles represent two complementary pathways:theoretical deepening and practical transformation.Future efforts should promote the standardization and localized integration of the conceptual framework,assessment tools,and training systems for narrative competence.</p>","PeriodicalId":6919,"journal":{"name":"中国医学科学院学报","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医学科学院学报","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.17452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To systematically review the conceptual evolution and research focus of narrative competence among healthcare professionals and to reveal the differences and complementary relationships between Chinese and English articles. Methods CiteSpace-based knowledge mapping was conducted on the articles related to narrative competence published between 2001 and 2025,including 103 articles from four major English databases (PubMed,Web of Science Core Collection,APA PsycINFO,and CINAHL) and 186 articles from three major Chinese databases (CNKI,Wanfang Data,and VIP).Keyword co-occurrence analysis was performed to identify research hotspots,and cluster analysis to reveal differences in research orientations between English and Chinese articles.Keyword bursts were detected to track the temporal trajectory of conceptual evolution. Results The concept of narrative competence shows a trend of evolving from abstract humanistic ideas to concrete clinical competencies.English articles focus more on theoretical construction and humanistic connotations,while Chinese articles emphasize application and operability,translating narrative competence into measurable core abilities. Conclusions The development of narrative competence follows a trajectory of "meta-concept-dimensionalization-operationalization framework".English and Chinese articles represent two complementary pathways:theoretical deepening and practical transformation.Future efforts should promote the standardization and localized integration of the conceptual framework,assessment tools,and training systems for narrative competence.

医疗保健专业人员叙事能力的概念演变与研究焦点:基于citspace的知识图谱。
目的系统回顾卫生保健专业人员叙事能力的概念演变和研究热点,揭示中英文文章的差异和互补关系。方法基于citespace对2001 - 2025年间发表的叙事能力相关文献进行知识图谱分析,包括来自PubMed、Web of Science Core Collection、APA PsycINFO和CINAHL四大英文数据库的103篇和来自CNKI、万方数据和VIP三大中文数据库的186篇。通过关键词共现分析找出研究热点,通过聚类分析揭示英汉文章研究取向的差异。通过检测关键词爆发来跟踪概念演化的时间轨迹。结果叙事能力的概念呈现出从抽象的人文概念向具体的临床能力演进的趋势。英文文章更注重理论建构和人文内涵,而中文文章则强调实用性和可操作性,将叙事能力转化为可测量的核心能力。结论叙事能力的发展遵循“元概念-维度化-操作化框架”的发展轨迹。中英文文章表现为理论深化和实践转化两条互补的路径。未来的努力应促进叙事能力的概念框架、评估工具和培训系统的标准化和本地化整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国医学科学院学报
中国医学科学院学报 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6813
期刊介绍: Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae was founded in February 1979. It is a comprehensive medical academic journal published in China and abroad, supervised by the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China and sponsored by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. The journal mainly reports the latest research results, work progress and dynamics in the fields of basic medicine, clinical medicine, pharmacy, preventive medicine, biomedicine, medical teaching and research, aiming to promote the exchange of medical information and improve the academic level of medicine. At present, the journal has been included in 10 famous foreign retrieval systems and their databases [Medline (PubMed online version), Elsevier, EMBASE, CA, WPRIM, ExtraMED, IC, JST, UPD and EBSCO-ASP]; and has been included in important domestic retrieval systems and databases [China Science Citation Database (Documentation and Information Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences), China Core Journals Overview (Peking University Library), China Science and Technology Paper Statistical Source Database (China Science and Technology Core Journals) (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information), China Science and Technology Journal Paper and Citation Database (China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书