Which Behavior Change Techniques Are Consistently Used in Effective Obesity-Related Interventions for Vulnerable Populations? A Meta-Review.

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2026-09-28 DOI:10.1111/obr.70223
Paulina Krzywicka, Zofia Szczuka, Jowita Misiakowska, Hanna Zaleskiewicz, Anna Kornafel, Elisabeth Thiering, Patricia Grill, Malou Reipurth, Maria Kafyra, George Dedoussis, Aleksandra Luszczynska
{"title":"Which Behavior Change Techniques Are Consistently Used in Effective Obesity-Related Interventions for Vulnerable Populations? A Meta-Review.","authors":"Paulina Krzywicka, Zofia Szczuka, Jowita Misiakowska, Hanna Zaleskiewicz, Anna Kornafel, Elisabeth Thiering, Patricia Grill, Malou Reipurth, Maria Kafyra, George Dedoussis, Aleksandra Luszczynska","doi":"10.1111/obr.70223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this paper was to synthesize the evidence on the active components of behavioral weight reduction interventions delivered to individuals with overweight/obesity from vulnerable populations, including people with low socioeconomic position, ethnic minority status, older age, mental health issues, and rural residence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-review preregistered with the PROSPERO repository (number CRD42024532138) was conducted. Following the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, seven electronic databases were searched, resulting in the inclusion of 37 reviews. The ROBIS tool was used to assess the risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve behavior change techniques were identified as components of interventions that were effective in > 60% of trials targeting indicators of body weight reduction or physical activity improvements in vulnerable populations. For weight reduction-related indicators, goal setting, action planning, self-monitoring of behavior, self-monitoring of the outcome of behavior, instruction on how to perform the behavior, social comparison, prompts/cues, behavioral practice/rehearsal, and credible source were supported. For physical activity-related outcomes, social support (unspecified) and demonstration of the behavior were supported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results provide insights into behavior change techniques that may be prioritized in interventions aimed at weight reduction among adults from vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e70223"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.70223","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this paper was to synthesize the evidence on the active components of behavioral weight reduction interventions delivered to individuals with overweight/obesity from vulnerable populations, including people with low socioeconomic position, ethnic minority status, older age, mental health issues, and rural residence.

Methods: A meta-review preregistered with the PROSPERO repository (number CRD42024532138) was conducted. Following the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, seven electronic databases were searched, resulting in the inclusion of 37 reviews. The ROBIS tool was used to assess the risk of bias.

Results: Twelve behavior change techniques were identified as components of interventions that were effective in > 60% of trials targeting indicators of body weight reduction or physical activity improvements in vulnerable populations. For weight reduction-related indicators, goal setting, action planning, self-monitoring of behavior, self-monitoring of the outcome of behavior, instruction on how to perform the behavior, social comparison, prompts/cues, behavioral practice/rehearsal, and credible source were supported. For physical activity-related outcomes, social support (unspecified) and demonstration of the behavior were supported.

Conclusion: The results provide insights into behavior change techniques that may be prioritized in interventions aimed at weight reduction among adults from vulnerable populations.

哪些行为改变技术在弱势群体的有效肥胖相关干预中持续使用?一个方法。
前言:本文的目的是综合对来自弱势人群的超重/肥胖个体的行为减肥干预的积极成分的证据,包括社会经济地位低、少数民族、年龄较大、心理健康问题和农村居住的人。方法:在PROSPERO数据库(编号CRD42024532138)进行预注册的meta综述。按照PRISMA系统评价准则,检索了7个电子数据库,纳入了37篇评价。使用ROBIS工具评估偏倚风险。结果:12种行为改变技术被确定为干预措施的组成部分,在针对弱势群体体重减轻或身体活动改善指标的60%的试验中有效。对于减肥相关指标,支持目标设定、行动计划、行为自我监控、行为结果自我监控、如何执行行为的指导、社会比较、提示/线索、行为练习/排练和可信来源。对于身体活动相关的结果,社会支持(未指明)和行为的表现得到了支持。结论:该结果为行为改变技术提供了见解,这些技术可能优先用于针对弱势群体的成年人减肥的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书