Comparison of three gestational weight gain guidelines for adverse pregnancy outcomes in Chinese women with gestational diabetes: A cohort study.

IF 3 3区 医学
Shuang Zhang, Weiqin Li, Nan Li, Jia Guo, Linglin Tan, Huikun Liu
{"title":"Comparison of three gestational weight gain guidelines for adverse pregnancy outcomes in Chinese women with gestational diabetes: A cohort study.","authors":"Shuang Zhang, Weiqin Li, Nan Li, Jia Guo, Linglin Tan, Huikun Liu","doi":"10.1111/jdi.70439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to assess the associations between post-diagnostic gestational weight gain (GWG) and adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to systematically compare the predictive performance of three mainstream GWG guidelines (IOM-2009, CNS-2021, NHCC-2023), so as to provide real-world evidence for precise GWG management in clinical GDM care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective population-based study was conducted utilizing the standardized prenatal surveillance system in Tianjin, China. Women with GDM were stratified into insufficient, appropriate, and excessive GWG groups according to the IOM-2009, CNS-2021, and NHCC-2023 criteria. Independent associations of abnormal GWG with adverse perinatal outcomes were analyzed using independent t-tests, chi-squared tests, and multivariable logistic regression models in SPSS 26.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 69,859 pregnant women were enrolled in the present study, including 7,198 women diagnosed with GDM. The NHCC-2023 guideline identified the highest proportion of excessive GWG (56.6%), compared with CNS-2021 (52.7%) and IOM-2009 (53.3%). Notably, only NHCC-2023 revealed a significant bidirectional association between GWG and PE risk: insufficient GWG (OR = 1.512, 95% CI: 1.057-2.162) and excessive GWG (OR = 2.449, 95% CI: 1.844-3.253) were both independently correlated with higher PE susceptibility. Excessive postdiagnostic GWG was associated with elevated risks of cesarean section and large for gestational age (LGA) infants across all three guideline frameworks, while associations for preterm birth and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) varied by guideline criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GDM-specific NHCC-2023 guideline supports precise, population-tailored GWG management for Chinese women with GDM and holds promising clinical applicability for Asian GDM populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13620339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.70439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the associations between post-diagnostic gestational weight gain (GWG) and adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to systematically compare the predictive performance of three mainstream GWG guidelines (IOM-2009, CNS-2021, NHCC-2023), so as to provide real-world evidence for precise GWG management in clinical GDM care.

Methods: This retrospective population-based study was conducted utilizing the standardized prenatal surveillance system in Tianjin, China. Women with GDM were stratified into insufficient, appropriate, and excessive GWG groups according to the IOM-2009, CNS-2021, and NHCC-2023 criteria. Independent associations of abnormal GWG with adverse perinatal outcomes were analyzed using independent t-tests, chi-squared tests, and multivariable logistic regression models in SPSS 26.0.

Results: A total of 69,859 pregnant women were enrolled in the present study, including 7,198 women diagnosed with GDM. The NHCC-2023 guideline identified the highest proportion of excessive GWG (56.6%), compared with CNS-2021 (52.7%) and IOM-2009 (53.3%). Notably, only NHCC-2023 revealed a significant bidirectional association between GWG and PE risk: insufficient GWG (OR = 1.512, 95% CI: 1.057-2.162) and excessive GWG (OR = 2.449, 95% CI: 1.844-3.253) were both independently correlated with higher PE susceptibility. Excessive postdiagnostic GWG was associated with elevated risks of cesarean section and large for gestational age (LGA) infants across all three guideline frameworks, while associations for preterm birth and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) varied by guideline criteria.

Conclusions: The GDM-specific NHCC-2023 guideline supports precise, population-tailored GWG management for Chinese women with GDM and holds promising clinical applicability for Asian GDM populations.

三种妊娠期体重增加指南对中国妊娠期糖尿病妇女不良妊娠结局的比较:一项队列研究。
背景:本研究旨在评估妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)女性诊断后妊娠体重增加(GWG)与不良妊娠结局的关系,并系统比较3种主流GWG指南(IOM-2009、CNS-2021、NHCC-2023)的预测效果,为GDM临床护理中GWG的精准管理提供现实依据。方法:本研究采用天津标准化产前监测系统进行回顾性人群研究。根据IOM-2009、CNS-2021和NHCC-2023标准,将GDM女性分为GWG不足、适当和过量组。在SPSS 26.0中使用独立t检验、卡方检验和多变量logistic回归模型分析异常GWG与围产期不良结局的独立相关性。结果:本研究共纳入69,859名孕妇,其中7198名被诊断为GDM。与CNS-2021(52.7%)和IOM-2009(53.3%)相比,NHCC-2023指南确定的GWG过量比例最高(56.6%)。值得注意的是,只有NHCC-2023显示GWG与PE风险之间存在显著的双向关联:GWG不足(OR = 1.512, 95% CI: 1.057-2.162)和GWG过量(OR = 2.449, 95% CI: 1.844-3.253)均与PE易感性较高独立相关。在所有三个指南框架中,诊断后GWG过高与剖宫产和大胎龄儿(LGA)的风险升高有关,而与早产和小胎龄儿(SGA)的关联因指南标准而异。结论:针对GDM的NHCC-2023指南支持对中国GDM女性患者进行精确的、人群量身定制的GWG管理,并在亚洲GDM人群中具有良好的临床适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Journal of Diabetes Investigation Medicine-Internal Medicine
自引率
9.40%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes Investigation is your core diabetes journal from Asia; the official journal of the Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD). The journal publishes original research, country reports, commentaries, reviews, mini-reviews, case reports, letters, as well as editorials and news. Embracing clinical and experimental research in diabetes and related areas, the Journal of Diabetes Investigation includes aspects of prevention, treatment, as well as molecular aspects and pathophysiology. Translational research focused on the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers is also welcome. Journal of Diabetes Investigation is indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书