{"title":"Lab Notebook Commentary: Transforming the Laboratory Notebook into a Framework for Risk Management","authors":"Eugene Oga, Jamea N. E. Yolandia","doi":"10.1021/acs.chas.5c00222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Laboratory notebooks\r\nremain central to chemical research\r\ndocumentation,\r\nyet their use as primarily historical records no longer aligns with\r\nthe complexity and risk profile of modern laboratory practice. To\r\nexamine how safety information is recorded and accessed during laboratory\r\nwork, an anonymous survey of 97 laboratory personnel from academic,\r\nindustry, government, and clinical laboratories was conducted. The\r\nsurvey evaluated notebook practices, accessibility of safety resources,\r\nand the extent to which hazard identification and risk management\r\nare documented alongside experimental procedures. Survey results reveal\r\ninconsistent integration of safety planning into laboratory notebook\r\nentries. Although notebooks are widely used for experimental documentation,\r\nfewer than one-third of respondents reported consistently recording\r\nsafety-related information directly within experimental entries. Many\r\nparticipants relied on external institutional systems or personnel\r\nto manage hazard information and Safety Data Sheets during experimental\r\nwork. These findings suggest that safety information is frequently\r\nseparated from experimental documentation, potentially limiting its\r\naccessibility during active laboratory work. The results highlight\r\nan opportunity to strengthen laboratory safety practices by more effectively\r\nintegrating hazard awareness and risk management considerations within\r\nlaboratory notebook documentation. Based on these findings, this work\r\noutlines a framework for incorporating structured safety information\r\nalongside experimental records to support continuity of risk communication\r\nand safer laboratory practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chemical health & safety","volume":"33 5","pages":"726–733"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chemical health & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chas.5c00222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Laboratory notebooks
remain central to chemical research
documentation,
yet their use as primarily historical records no longer aligns with
the complexity and risk profile of modern laboratory practice. To
examine how safety information is recorded and accessed during laboratory
work, an anonymous survey of 97 laboratory personnel from academic,
industry, government, and clinical laboratories was conducted. The
survey evaluated notebook practices, accessibility of safety resources,
and the extent to which hazard identification and risk management
are documented alongside experimental procedures. Survey results reveal
inconsistent integration of safety planning into laboratory notebook
entries. Although notebooks are widely used for experimental documentation,
fewer than one-third of respondents reported consistently recording
safety-related information directly within experimental entries. Many
participants relied on external institutional systems or personnel
to manage hazard information and Safety Data Sheets during experimental
work. These findings suggest that safety information is frequently
separated from experimental documentation, potentially limiting its
accessibility during active laboratory work. The results highlight
an opportunity to strengthen laboratory safety practices by more effectively
integrating hazard awareness and risk management considerations within
laboratory notebook documentation. Based on these findings, this work
outlines a framework for incorporating structured safety information
alongside experimental records to support continuity of risk communication
and safer laboratory practice.