Lab Notebook Commentary: Transforming the Laboratory Notebook into a Framework for Risk Management

IF 3.4
Journal of chemical health & safety Pub Date : 2026-09-28 Epub Date: 2026-05-05 DOI:10.1021/acs.chas.5c00222
Eugene Oga, Jamea N. E. Yolandia
{"title":"Lab Notebook Commentary: Transforming the Laboratory Notebook into a Framework for Risk Management","authors":"Eugene Oga,&nbsp;Jamea N. E. Yolandia","doi":"10.1021/acs.chas.5c00222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Laboratory notebooks\r\nremain central to chemical research\r\ndocumentation,\r\nyet their use as primarily historical records no longer aligns with\r\nthe complexity and risk profile of modern laboratory practice. To\r\nexamine how safety information is recorded and accessed during laboratory\r\nwork, an anonymous survey of 97 laboratory personnel from academic,\r\nindustry, government, and clinical laboratories was conducted. The\r\nsurvey evaluated notebook practices, accessibility of safety resources,\r\nand the extent to which hazard identification and risk management\r\nare documented alongside experimental procedures. Survey results reveal\r\ninconsistent integration of safety planning into laboratory notebook\r\nentries. Although notebooks are widely used for experimental documentation,\r\nfewer than one-third of respondents reported consistently recording\r\nsafety-related information directly within experimental entries. Many\r\nparticipants relied on external institutional systems or personnel\r\nto manage hazard information and Safety Data Sheets during experimental\r\nwork. These findings suggest that safety information is frequently\r\nseparated from experimental documentation, potentially limiting its\r\naccessibility during active laboratory work. The results highlight\r\nan opportunity to strengthen laboratory safety practices by more effectively\r\nintegrating hazard awareness and risk management considerations within\r\nlaboratory notebook documentation. Based on these findings, this work\r\noutlines a framework for incorporating structured safety information\r\nalongside experimental records to support continuity of risk communication\r\nand safer laboratory practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chemical health & safety","volume":"33 5","pages":"726–733"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chemical health & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chas.5c00222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laboratory notebooks remain central to chemical research documentation, yet their use as primarily historical records no longer aligns with the complexity and risk profile of modern laboratory practice. To examine how safety information is recorded and accessed during laboratory work, an anonymous survey of 97 laboratory personnel from academic, industry, government, and clinical laboratories was conducted. The survey evaluated notebook practices, accessibility of safety resources, and the extent to which hazard identification and risk management are documented alongside experimental procedures. Survey results reveal inconsistent integration of safety planning into laboratory notebook entries. Although notebooks are widely used for experimental documentation, fewer than one-third of respondents reported consistently recording safety-related information directly within experimental entries. Many participants relied on external institutional systems or personnel to manage hazard information and Safety Data Sheets during experimental work. These findings suggest that safety information is frequently separated from experimental documentation, potentially limiting its accessibility during active laboratory work. The results highlight an opportunity to strengthen laboratory safety practices by more effectively integrating hazard awareness and risk management considerations within laboratory notebook documentation. Based on these findings, this work outlines a framework for incorporating structured safety information alongside experimental records to support continuity of risk communication and safer laboratory practice.

实验室笔记评论:将实验室笔记转变为风险管理的框架
实验室笔记仍然是化学研究文档的核心,但它们作为主要历史记录的使用不再符合现代实验室实践的复杂性和风险概况。为了检查在实验室工作中如何记录和获取安全信息,对来自学术、工业、政府和临床实验室的97名实验室人员进行了匿名调查。调查评估了笔记操作、安全资源的可及性、危害识别和风险管理与实验程序一起记录的程度。调查结果显示,安全计划与实验室笔记的整合不一致。尽管笔记本被广泛用于实验文档,但不到三分之一的受访者报告说,他们一直直接在实验条目中记录与安全相关的信息。在实验过程中,许多参与者依靠外部机构系统或人员来管理危害信息和安全数据表。这些发现表明,安全信息经常与实验文件分离,潜在地限制了其在实验室工作中的可访问性。结果强调了通过在实验室笔记本文件中更有效地整合危害意识和风险管理考虑因素来加强实验室安全实践的机会。基于这些发现,本工作概述了将结构化安全信息与实验记录结合起来的框架,以支持风险沟通的连续性和更安全的实验室实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书