{"title":"Evaluation of the detection accuracy of a fully automated AI-based lesion segmentation tool in whole-body FDG PET/CT for lymphoma.","authors":"Tshegofatso Masogo, Palak Wadhwa, Chimbabantu Kaoma, Yashna Seebarruth, Milani Qebetu, Kaluzi Banda, Pryaska Goorhoo, Khomotso Legodi, Dileep Kumar, Mike Sathekge, Keamogetswe Ramonaheng","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2026.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated an AI-based lesion segmentation tool using a hybrid 2D-3D deep learning model based on the nnUNet architecture with a ResNet18 backbone, incorporating post-processing to reduce false positives and segmentation-related quantitative errors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Whole-body FDG PET/CT scans from 72 lymphoma patients (mean age 39.2 ± 18.6 years; 33 females, 39 males; 43.1% Hodgkin lymphoma, 56.9% non-Hodgkin lymphoma) acquired on a uMI550 digital PET/CT system were retrospectively analysed. Automated AI-based segmentations were compared with manual delineations by experienced physicians. Performance was assessed using F1-score, sensitivity, and positive predictive value. Quantitative agreement for all PET metrics was evaluated using Pearson correlation, concordance correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, regression, and Bland-Altman analysis. McNemar's test assessed detection differences. The correlations between DSC and image quality metrics were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 711 AI and 848 manually segmented lesions were analysed. The AI model achieved an excellent DSC (89.2%), sensitivity (82.9) and PPV (96.5) which indicated balanced detection performance. Strong correlations were observed for all quantitative parameters (r > 0.95, p < 0.001; CCC > 0.94; ICC > 0.94; 95% CI: 0.93-0.99), with minimal bias on Bland-Altman analysis. DSC showed a moderate negative correlation with liver SNR (r = -0.40, p < 0.001) and weak correlations with liver SUV metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fully automated AI-based segmentation tool demonstrated good-to-excellent lesion detection accuracy and high quantitative concordance with manual segmentation in whole-body FDG PET/CT for lymphoma patients. Continued model refinement and region-specific training are warranted to enhance detection performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":101315,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2026.09.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated an AI-based lesion segmentation tool using a hybrid 2D-3D deep learning model based on the nnUNet architecture with a ResNet18 backbone, incorporating post-processing to reduce false positives and segmentation-related quantitative errors.
Methods: Whole-body FDG PET/CT scans from 72 lymphoma patients (mean age 39.2 ± 18.6 years; 33 females, 39 males; 43.1% Hodgkin lymphoma, 56.9% non-Hodgkin lymphoma) acquired on a uMI550 digital PET/CT system were retrospectively analysed. Automated AI-based segmentations were compared with manual delineations by experienced physicians. Performance was assessed using F1-score, sensitivity, and positive predictive value. Quantitative agreement for all PET metrics was evaluated using Pearson correlation, concordance correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, regression, and Bland-Altman analysis. McNemar's test assessed detection differences. The correlations between DSC and image quality metrics were examined.
Results: A total of 711 AI and 848 manually segmented lesions were analysed. The AI model achieved an excellent DSC (89.2%), sensitivity (82.9) and PPV (96.5) which indicated balanced detection performance. Strong correlations were observed for all quantitative parameters (r > 0.95, p < 0.001; CCC > 0.94; ICC > 0.94; 95% CI: 0.93-0.99), with minimal bias on Bland-Altman analysis. DSC showed a moderate negative correlation with liver SNR (r = -0.40, p < 0.001) and weak correlations with liver SUV metrics.
Conclusion: The fully automated AI-based segmentation tool demonstrated good-to-excellent lesion detection accuracy and high quantitative concordance with manual segmentation in whole-body FDG PET/CT for lymphoma patients. Continued model refinement and region-specific training are warranted to enhance detection performance.