Determinants of preterm pre-eclampsia following low-dose aspirin prophylaxis: evidence from stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial in Asia.

IF 6.3
J Lin, L Nguyen-Hoang, L T Dinh, R K Pooh, A Ohkuchi, M Zheng, Y Wu, A Kusuma, T Wataganara, M Choolani, M Kaneko, S Luewan, T-Y Chang, N Chaiyasit, T Nanthakomon, H Liu, S W Shaw, L C Poon
{"title":"Determinants of preterm pre-eclampsia following low-dose aspirin prophylaxis: evidence from stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial in Asia.","authors":"J Lin, L Nguyen-Hoang, L T Dinh, R K Pooh, A Ohkuchi, M Zheng, Y Wu, A Kusuma, T Wataganara, M Choolani, M Kaneko, S Luewan, T-Y Chang, N Chaiyasit, T Nanthakomon, H Liu, S W Shaw, L C Poon","doi":"10.1002/uog.70339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify potential risk factors - among maternal factors, pre-eclampsia (PE)-specific biomarkers and estimated risks derived from the first-trimester Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) triple test - that are associated with the subsequent development of preterm PE, and to evaluate predictors of any-onset PE using time-to-event analysis, in high-risk women receiving low-dose aspirin prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial, including 18 maternity/diagnostic units from 10 regions in Asia between August 2019 and February 2022. The study population comprised women with a singleton pregnancy identified as being at high risk for preterm PE (estimated risk ≥ 1:100) according to the first-trimester FMF triple test, who subsequently received low-dose aspirin prophylaxis. A locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) curve was applied initially to explore the relationship between the incidence of preterm PE and the estimated risk. Based on the trend observed in the LOESS curve, participants were categorized into five estimated risk groups: 1:2 to 1:5, 1:6 to 1:10, 1:11 to 1:20, 1:21 to 1:50 and 1:51 to 1:100. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of preterm PE and to evaluate the risk of delivery with PE, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2919 high-risk pregnant women receiving aspirin prophylaxis, 280 (9.6%) developed PE, including 107 (3.7%) who developed preterm PE. Chronic hypertension (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.835 (95% CI, 1.070-3.146)), mean arterial pressure (MAP) multiples of the median (MoM) > 1.149 (aOR, 2.162 (95% CI, 1.434-3.261)) and higher estimated risk were associated with higher odds of preterm PE. Compared to women with an estimated risk of 1:51 to 1:100, those with estimated risks of 1:2 to 1:5, 1:6 to 1:10 and 1:11 to 1:20 had a 16-fold (aOR, 15.845 (95% CI, 8.166-30.746)), eight-fold (aOR, 7.674 (95% CI, 3.925-15.004)) and three-fold (aOR, 3.454 (95% CI, 1.802-6.622)) higher odds of developing preterm PE, respectively, whereas no significant difference was observed in those with an estimated risk of 1:21 to 1:50 (aOR, 1.343 (95% CI, 0.722-2.499)). On Cox regression analysis, chronic hypertension was associated with a three-fold higher risk of delivering with PE (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 2.979 (95% CI, 2.154-4.120)), while MAP MoM > 1.149 increased the risk by 66% (aHR, 1.659 (95% CI, 1.304-2.111)). Compared with the reference group (estimated risk of 1:51 to 1:100), the risk of delivering with PE increased progressively across estimated risk groups, with aHRs of 1.435 (95% CI, 1.051-1.959), 2.408 (95% CI, 1.653-3.508), 4.058 (95% CI, 2.658-6.197) and 7.053 (95% CI, 4.588-10.841) for the 1:21 to 1:50, 1:11 to 1:20, 1:6 to 1:10, and 1:2 to 1:5 estimated risk groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chronic hypertension, elevated MAP and higher estimated risk are associated with the earlier development of PE in women identified as high risk by the first-trimester FMF triple test, despite low-dose aspirin prophylaxis. Incorporating these factors into the risk stratification framework may improve the detection of residual risk in first-trimester screening and prevention strategies, thereby supporting the development of more effective preventive measures. © 2026 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":520822,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"492-503"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13641730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.70339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify potential risk factors - among maternal factors, pre-eclampsia (PE)-specific biomarkers and estimated risks derived from the first-trimester Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) triple test - that are associated with the subsequent development of preterm PE, and to evaluate predictors of any-onset PE using time-to-event analysis, in high-risk women receiving low-dose aspirin prophylaxis.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial, including 18 maternity/diagnostic units from 10 regions in Asia between August 2019 and February 2022. The study population comprised women with a singleton pregnancy identified as being at high risk for preterm PE (estimated risk ≥ 1:100) according to the first-trimester FMF triple test, who subsequently received low-dose aspirin prophylaxis. A locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) curve was applied initially to explore the relationship between the incidence of preterm PE and the estimated risk. Based on the trend observed in the LOESS curve, participants were categorized into five estimated risk groups: 1:2 to 1:5, 1:6 to 1:10, 1:11 to 1:20, 1:21 to 1:50 and 1:51 to 1:100. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of preterm PE and to evaluate the risk of delivery with PE, respectively.

Results: Among 2919 high-risk pregnant women receiving aspirin prophylaxis, 280 (9.6%) developed PE, including 107 (3.7%) who developed preterm PE. Chronic hypertension (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.835 (95% CI, 1.070-3.146)), mean arterial pressure (MAP) multiples of the median (MoM) > 1.149 (aOR, 2.162 (95% CI, 1.434-3.261)) and higher estimated risk were associated with higher odds of preterm PE. Compared to women with an estimated risk of 1:51 to 1:100, those with estimated risks of 1:2 to 1:5, 1:6 to 1:10 and 1:11 to 1:20 had a 16-fold (aOR, 15.845 (95% CI, 8.166-30.746)), eight-fold (aOR, 7.674 (95% CI, 3.925-15.004)) and three-fold (aOR, 3.454 (95% CI, 1.802-6.622)) higher odds of developing preterm PE, respectively, whereas no significant difference was observed in those with an estimated risk of 1:21 to 1:50 (aOR, 1.343 (95% CI, 0.722-2.499)). On Cox regression analysis, chronic hypertension was associated with a three-fold higher risk of delivering with PE (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 2.979 (95% CI, 2.154-4.120)), while MAP MoM > 1.149 increased the risk by 66% (aHR, 1.659 (95% CI, 1.304-2.111)). Compared with the reference group (estimated risk of 1:51 to 1:100), the risk of delivering with PE increased progressively across estimated risk groups, with aHRs of 1.435 (95% CI, 1.051-1.959), 2.408 (95% CI, 1.653-3.508), 4.058 (95% CI, 2.658-6.197) and 7.053 (95% CI, 4.588-10.841) for the 1:21 to 1:50, 1:11 to 1:20, 1:6 to 1:10, and 1:2 to 1:5 estimated risk groups, respectively.

Conclusions: Chronic hypertension, elevated MAP and higher estimated risk are associated with the earlier development of PE in women identified as high risk by the first-trimester FMF triple test, despite low-dose aspirin prophylaxis. Incorporating these factors into the risk stratification framework may improve the detection of residual risk in first-trimester screening and prevention strategies, thereby supporting the development of more effective preventive measures. © 2026 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

低剂量阿司匹林预防后早产子痫前期的决定因素:来自亚洲阶梯形随机试验的证据。
目的:在接受低剂量阿司匹林预防的高危妇女中,确定与早产PE相关的潜在危险因素,包括母体因素、先兆子痫(PE)特异性生物标志物和妊娠早期胎儿医学基金会(FMF)三重试验得出的估计风险,并利用时间-事件分析评估任何起病PE的预测因素。方法:这是对2019年8月至2022年2月期间来自亚洲10个地区的18个产科/诊断单位的多中心楔形聚类随机试验的二次分析。研究人群包括根据妊娠早期FMF三重试验确定为早产PE高风险的单胎妊娠妇女(估计风险≥1:100),随后接受低剂量阿司匹林预防。初步应用局部估计的散点图平滑(黄土)曲线来探讨早产PE发生率与估计风险之间的关系。根据黄土曲线上观察到的趋势,将参与者分为5个估计风险组:1:2 ~ 1:5、1:6 ~ 1:10、1:11 ~ 1:20、1:21 ~ 1:50和1:51 ~ 1:10。分别进行Logistic和Cox回归分析,以确定早产PE的独立预测因素,并评估PE分娩的风险。结果:在接受阿司匹林预防的2919例高危孕妇中,280例(9.6%)发生PE,其中107例(3.7%)发生早产儿PE。慢性高血压(校正优势比(aOR), 1.835 (95% CI, 1.070-3.146)),平均动脉压(MAP)中位(MoM) bb0的倍数1.149 (aOR, 2.162 (95% CI, 1.434-3.261))和较高的估计风险与早产PE的较高几率相关。相比女性的风险估计1 1:10 0,估计风险的1:2 1:5,1:6 1:10,1:11 1:20有16倍(优势比,15.845(95%可信区间,8.166 - -30.746))、八(优势比,7.674(95%可信区间,3.925 - -15.004))和三倍(优势比,3.454(95%可信区间,1.802 - -6.622))更高的发展中早产的几率PE,分别,而无显著差异,估计就一21 1:50的风险(优势比,1.343(95%可信区间,0.722 - -2.499))。在Cox回归分析中,慢性高血压与PE合并分娩的风险增加3倍相关(校正危险比(aHR), 2.979 (95% CI, 2.154-4.120)),而MAP MoM > 1.149使风险增加66% (aHR, 1.659 (95% CI, 1.304-2.111))。与参考组相比(估计风险为1:51至1:100),PE分娩的风险在估计风险组中逐渐增加,1:21至1:50、1:11至1:20、1:6至1:10和1:2至1:5估计风险组的ahr分别为1.435 (95% CI, 1.051-1.959)、2.408 (95% CI, 1.653-3.508)、4.058 (95% CI, 2.658-6.197)和7.053 (95% CI, 4.588-10.841)。结论:慢性高血压、MAP升高和较高的估计风险与早期妊娠FMF三重试验确定为高风险的PE妇女的早期发展相关,尽管有低剂量阿司匹林预防。将这些因素纳入风险分层框架可以改善妊娠早期筛查和预防策略中残留风险的发现,从而支持制定更有效的预防措施。©2026作者。妇产科学超声由John Wiley & Sons Ltd代表国际妇产科学超声学会出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书