Examining Site-Level and Structural Factors Influencing the Recruitment and Engagement of Participants of Color in Perinatal Substance Use Research: Insights From the Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder in Expectant Mothers (MOMs) Trial.

IF 2.4
Erin Major, Alexindra Wheeler, Julyvette Vazquez, Latisha Goullaud, Frankie Kropp, Shelly F Greenfield, Marcela C Smid, Timothy Wilens, T John Winhusen, Davida M Schiff
{"title":"Examining Site-Level and Structural Factors Influencing the Recruitment and Engagement of Participants of Color in Perinatal Substance Use Research: Insights From the Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder in Expectant Mothers (MOMs) Trial.","authors":"Erin Major, Alexindra Wheeler, Julyvette Vazquez, Latisha Goullaud, Frankie Kropp, Shelly F Greenfield, Marcela C Smid, Timothy Wilens, T John Winhusen, Davida M Schiff","doi":"10.1177/29767342261478707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racial and ethnic inequities persist in perinatal opioid use disorder (OUD) care, with pregnant and postpartum people of color facing structural barriers to using medications to treat OUD (MOUD). Because access to clinical research is often mediated through treatment settings, these structural barriers may also shape who is reached, recruited, and retained in perinatal OUD trials. The Medication Treatment for OUD in Expectant Mothers trial (NCT03918850) provided an opportunity to assess how site-level and policy contexts influenced equitable recruitment, including gaps between projected and actual enrollment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a convergent parallel mixed-methods design integrating thematic analysis of semi-structured qualitative interviews with non-White and/or Hispanic trial participants and research staff, site survey data, state policy classifications, and administrative enrollment data from the 13 trial sites. We examined how clinical structures, staffing composition, and policy environments shaped equitable recruitment. For each site, we calculated a recruitment ratio (actual/expected non-White and/or Hispanic enrollment).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 13 trial sites, 3 exceeded projected recruitment of non-White and/or Hispanic participants, 7 fell below projections, and 2 enrolled no non-White and/or Hispanic participants. Recruitment ratios (actual/expected) ranged from 0.0 to 6.3. Sites that exceeded projections commonly reported the inclusion of peer clinical staff and integration of prenatal and OUD care and were more often located in states without mandated reporting of MOUD during pregnancy. Qualitative analyses of participant (n = 17) and research staff interviews (n = 32) identified themes of trust, representation, and lived experience, emphasizing their importance for equitable recruitment and engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Equity in perinatal substance use disorder (SUD) research depends not only on inclusive trial design but also on the relational and policy conditions that build trust and enable participation. Beyond demographic targets, findings point to institutional practices, community partnerships, and supportive policy environments as actionable levers to promote equitable recruitment and engagement in perinatal SUD research.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"29767342261478707"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342261478707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Racial and ethnic inequities persist in perinatal opioid use disorder (OUD) care, with pregnant and postpartum people of color facing structural barriers to using medications to treat OUD (MOUD). Because access to clinical research is often mediated through treatment settings, these structural barriers may also shape who is reached, recruited, and retained in perinatal OUD trials. The Medication Treatment for OUD in Expectant Mothers trial (NCT03918850) provided an opportunity to assess how site-level and policy contexts influenced equitable recruitment, including gaps between projected and actual enrollment.

Methods: We employed a convergent parallel mixed-methods design integrating thematic analysis of semi-structured qualitative interviews with non-White and/or Hispanic trial participants and research staff, site survey data, state policy classifications, and administrative enrollment data from the 13 trial sites. We examined how clinical structures, staffing composition, and policy environments shaped equitable recruitment. For each site, we calculated a recruitment ratio (actual/expected non-White and/or Hispanic enrollment).

Results: Among the 13 trial sites, 3 exceeded projected recruitment of non-White and/or Hispanic participants, 7 fell below projections, and 2 enrolled no non-White and/or Hispanic participants. Recruitment ratios (actual/expected) ranged from 0.0 to 6.3. Sites that exceeded projections commonly reported the inclusion of peer clinical staff and integration of prenatal and OUD care and were more often located in states without mandated reporting of MOUD during pregnancy. Qualitative analyses of participant (n = 17) and research staff interviews (n = 32) identified themes of trust, representation, and lived experience, emphasizing their importance for equitable recruitment and engagement.

Conclusion: Equity in perinatal substance use disorder (SUD) research depends not only on inclusive trial design but also on the relational and policy conditions that build trust and enable participation. Beyond demographic targets, findings point to institutional practices, community partnerships, and supportive policy environments as actionable levers to promote equitable recruitment and engagement in perinatal SUD research.

围产期药物使用研究中影响有色人种参与者招募和参与的场所水平和结构因素:来自孕妇阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗试验的见解
背景:在围产期阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)护理中,种族和民族不平等仍然存在,有色人种孕妇和产后在使用药物治疗OUD (mod)方面面临结构性障碍。由于临床研究的获取通常是通过治疗环境来调节的,这些结构性障碍也可能影响围产期OUD试验的覆盖范围、招募和保留。孕妇OUD的药物治疗试验(NCT03918850)提供了一个评估地点水平和政策背景如何影响公平招募的机会,包括计划和实际招募之间的差距。方法:我们采用融合并行混合方法设计,整合了对非白人和/或西班牙裔试验参与者和研究人员的半结构化定性访谈的主题分析、现场调查数据、州政策分类和来自13个试验地点的行政登记数据。我们研究了临床结构、人员组成和政策环境如何影响公平招聘。对于每个网站,我们计算了一个招聘比率(实际/预期的非白人和/或西班牙裔入学率)。结果:在13个试验点中,3个超过了预期招募的非白人和/或西班牙裔参与者,7个低于预期,2个没有招募非白人和/或西班牙裔参与者。招聘比率(实际/预期)介乎0.0至6.3。超出预测的地点通常报告包括同行临床工作人员和产前和OUD护理的整合,并且更多地位于没有强制报告怀孕期间OUD的州。对参与者(n = 17)和研究人员访谈(n = 32)的定性分析确定了信任、代表性和生活经验的主题,强调了它们对公平招聘和参与的重要性。结论:围产期物质使用障碍(SUD)研究的公平性不仅取决于包容性试验设计,还取决于建立信任和促进参与的关系和政策条件。除了人口目标之外,研究结果还指出,机构实践、社区伙伴关系和支持性政策环境是促进围产期SUD研究公平招聘和参与的可行杠杆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书