[A randomized controlled study on application of giant needle electroacupuncture at different times for improving pain and joint function after total knee arthroplasty].

Q4 Medicine
Minglan Xu, Jun Shen, Pengfei Sun, Jianye Wang, Chi Zhao, Bingxin Kang, Xiaoxue Hu, Lianbo Xiao
{"title":"[A randomized controlled study on application of giant needle electroacupuncture at different times for improving pain and joint function after total knee arthroplasty].","authors":"Minglan Xu, Jun Shen, Pengfei Sun, Jianye Wang, Chi Zhao, Bingxin Kang, Xiaoxue Hu, Lianbo Xiao","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore clinical efficacy of applying giant needle electroacupuncture at different times in improving pain and joint function after total knee arthroplasty(TKA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 patients who underwent TKA from July 2022 to March 2023 were included. They were divided into preoperative electro-acupuncture group, postoperative electro-acupuncture group, and control group according to different intervention times of electro-acupuncture, and 38 patients in each group, 2 patients from each group were dropped out, resulting in a final inclusion of 114 patients. In preoperative electro-acupuncture group, there were 7 males and 31 females;aged from 60 to 80 years old with an average of (72.0±5.8) years old;electro-acupuncture was performed on Weishu acupoint (ST32), Zusanli acupoint (ST36), Yinlingquan acupoint (SP9), and Yanglingquan acupoint (GB34) of non-operated lower limbs at 1 day before operation, 30 min before anesthesia induction, and 1 to 3 days after operation. In postoperative electro-acupuncture group, there were 9 males and 29 females;aged from 60 to 80 years old with average of (71.6±6.7) years old;the same acupuncture points and parameters were treated 1 to 3 days after operation. In control group, there were 6 males and 32 females;aged from 60 to 80 years old with an average of (71.6±7.1) years old;and were received pseudo-electroacupuncture treatment. Pain was scored at rest and during movement respectively before operation and 4 to 7 days after operation by using numerical rating scale at rest (NRSR) and numerical rating scale with movement (NRSM), joint function was evaluated by active range of motion (AROM) of knee joint, Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS) knee score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 patients were followed up, with the follow-up period being 7 days after operation. There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative NRSR, NRSM, AROM, HSS, and WOMAC scores among three groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). There were statistically significant differences among three groups of NRSR and NRSM scores on the 4th to 7th day after operation (<i>P</i><0.05). The comparison of AROM among three groups on the 7th day after operation showed statistically significant difference (<i>P</i><0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference when comparing the data from 4 to 6 days after operation (<i>P</i>>0.05). The comparisons of HSS and WOMAC scores on the 7th day after operation among three groups showed statistically significant differences (<i>P</i><0.05). NRSR scores of pre-electroacupuncture group on the 4th to 6th days after operation were 2.0(1.0, 2.3), 1.0(1.0, 2.0), and 1.0(1.0, 2.0) respectively, which were lower than those of post-electroacupuncture group 3.0(2.0, 4.0), 2.0(1.0, 3.0), 2.0(1.0, 2.0), and the differences were statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05). NRSM of preoperative electroacupuncture group on the 4th to 5th day after operation were 3.0(2.0, 3.0) and 2.0(1.0, 2.0), which were lower than those of postoperative electroacupuncture group 4.0(3.0, 5.0) and 3.0(2.0, 3.0), and the differences were statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05). HSS score of pre-electroacupuncture group on the 7th day after operation was (76.22±3.51), which was higher than that of post-electroacupuncture group (71.54±6.36), and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05). WOMAC score of pre-electroacupuncture group on the 7th day after operation was(19.84±3.61), which was lower than that of post-electroacupuncture group (22.37±3.81), and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application giant needle electroacupuncture before operation could better alleviate acute pain after TKA and improve function of knee joint.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"39 9","pages":"903-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore clinical efficacy of applying giant needle electroacupuncture at different times in improving pain and joint function after total knee arthroplasty(TKA).

Methods: A total of 120 patients who underwent TKA from July 2022 to March 2023 were included. They were divided into preoperative electro-acupuncture group, postoperative electro-acupuncture group, and control group according to different intervention times of electro-acupuncture, and 38 patients in each group, 2 patients from each group were dropped out, resulting in a final inclusion of 114 patients. In preoperative electro-acupuncture group, there were 7 males and 31 females;aged from 60 to 80 years old with an average of (72.0±5.8) years old;electro-acupuncture was performed on Weishu acupoint (ST32), Zusanli acupoint (ST36), Yinlingquan acupoint (SP9), and Yanglingquan acupoint (GB34) of non-operated lower limbs at 1 day before operation, 30 min before anesthesia induction, and 1 to 3 days after operation. In postoperative electro-acupuncture group, there were 9 males and 29 females;aged from 60 to 80 years old with average of (71.6±6.7) years old;the same acupuncture points and parameters were treated 1 to 3 days after operation. In control group, there were 6 males and 32 females;aged from 60 to 80 years old with an average of (71.6±7.1) years old;and were received pseudo-electroacupuncture treatment. Pain was scored at rest and during movement respectively before operation and 4 to 7 days after operation by using numerical rating scale at rest (NRSR) and numerical rating scale with movement (NRSM), joint function was evaluated by active range of motion (AROM) of knee joint, Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS) knee score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).

Results: A total of 114 patients were followed up, with the follow-up period being 7 days after operation. There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative NRSR, NRSM, AROM, HSS, and WOMAC scores among three groups (P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences among three groups of NRSR and NRSM scores on the 4th to 7th day after operation (P<0.05). The comparison of AROM among three groups on the 7th day after operation showed statistically significant difference (P<0.05), while there was no statistically significant difference when comparing the data from 4 to 6 days after operation (P>0.05). The comparisons of HSS and WOMAC scores on the 7th day after operation among three groups showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05). NRSR scores of pre-electroacupuncture group on the 4th to 6th days after operation were 2.0(1.0, 2.3), 1.0(1.0, 2.0), and 1.0(1.0, 2.0) respectively, which were lower than those of post-electroacupuncture group 3.0(2.0, 4.0), 2.0(1.0, 3.0), 2.0(1.0, 2.0), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). NRSM of preoperative electroacupuncture group on the 4th to 5th day after operation were 3.0(2.0, 3.0) and 2.0(1.0, 2.0), which were lower than those of postoperative electroacupuncture group 4.0(3.0, 5.0) and 3.0(2.0, 3.0), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). HSS score of pre-electroacupuncture group on the 7th day after operation was (76.22±3.51), which was higher than that of post-electroacupuncture group (71.54±6.36), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). WOMAC score of pre-electroacupuncture group on the 7th day after operation was(19.84±3.61), which was lower than that of post-electroacupuncture group (22.37±3.81), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion: The application giant needle electroacupuncture before operation could better alleviate acute pain after TKA and improve function of knee joint.

[不同时间应用巨针电针改善全膝关节置换术后疼痛及关节功能的随机对照研究]。
目的:探讨不同时间应用巨针电针改善全膝关节置换术后疼痛和关节功能的临床疗效。方法:选取2022年7月至2023年3月期间接受TKA治疗的患者120例。根据电针干预次数的不同分为术前电针组、术后电针组和对照组,每组38例,每组退出2例,最终纳入114例患者。术前电针组男性7例,女性31例;年龄60 ~ 80岁,平均(72.0±5.8)岁;于术前1 d、麻醉诱导前30 min、术后1 ~ 3 d分别电针非手术下肢胃俞穴(ST32)、足三里穴(ST36)、银陵泉穴(SP9)、阳陵泉穴(GB34)。术后电针组男性9例,女性29例;年龄60 ~ 80岁,平均(71.6±6.7)岁;术后1 ~ 3 d采用相同穴位和参数进行治疗。对照组男性6只,女性32只;年龄60 ~ 80岁,平均(71.6±7.1)岁;并接受假电针治疗。采用静息时数值评定量表(NRSR)和运动时数值评定量表(NRSM)分别对术前和术后4 ~ 7 d的静息时和运动时疼痛进行评分,关节功能采用膝关节主动活动度(AROM)、特殊外科医院(HSS)膝关节评分、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)进行评价。结果:共随访114例患者,随访时间为术后7 d。三组患者术前NRSR、NRSM、AROM、HSS、WOMAC评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。三组患者术后第4 ~ 7天NRSR及NRSM评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。三组患者术后第7天HSS、WOMAC评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(ppppp)。结论:术前应用巨针电针能较好地缓解全膝关节置换术后急性疼痛,改善膝关节功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书