Diagnostic and therapeutic gaps in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease management and their associations with 1-year survival after hospitalisation for acute exacerbations.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Swiss medical weekly Pub Date : 2026-08-31 DOI:10.57187/4634
Julian S Flury, David Srivastava, Recep A Hacialioglu, Sabrina Jegerlehner
{"title":"Diagnostic and therapeutic gaps in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease management and their associations with 1-year survival after hospitalisation for acute exacerbations.","authors":"Julian S Flury, David Srivastava, Recep A Hacialioglu, Sabrina Jegerlehner","doi":"10.57187/4634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AE-COPD) significantly worsen patient outcomes; however, COPD is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated despite established guidelines.This study aimed to assess (1) the characteristics of patients hospitalised for a first episode of AE-COPD, (2) the differences between patients who had received guideline-recommended inhalation therapy prior to their first AE-COPD hospitalisation and those who had not, and (3) the associations between patient characteristics, pre-hospital inhalation treatment status and 1-year all-cause mortality following the index hospitalisation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, 1855 consecutive patients admitted with clinically and spirometrically diagnosed AE-COPD to a secondary-level Swiss hospital between September 2016 and September 2024 were analysed. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality following the index hospitalisation. Survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression, with results reported as hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 50.6% (n = 938) of patients lacked documented spirometric GOLD staging and 82.6% (n = 1533) had no recorded risk classification. Patients were stratified based on pre-admission use of long-acting inhalation therapy: Group 1 (no therapy, n = 834 [45.0%]) and Group 2 (therapy, n = 1021 [55.0%]). Baseline characteristics were largely comparable between groups; however, patients receiving long-acting inhalation therapy (Group 2) had significantly more patients with spirometrically confirmed COPD. During 1-year follow-up, 236 deaths (12.7%) occurred, in 133 of the 834 (15.9%) Group 1 patients and 103 of the 1021 (10.1%) Group 2 patients  (log-rank p <0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, no long-acting inhalation therapy (Group 1) as a variable was independently associated with higher 1-year all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 1.95, CI: 1.48-2.56, p <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Significant diagnostic and therapeutic gaps were observed in patients hospitalised for the first episode of AE-COPD. Guideline-recommended inhalation therapy prior to hospitalisation was independently associated with decreased 1-year all-cause mortality. Our findings suggest that guideline-recommended inhalation therapy reflects structured COPD care, earlier diagnosis and closer medical follow-up rather than a pharmacological effect alone. Hospitalisation for AE-COPD represents a critical opportunity to reassess the diagnosis and optimise long-term management, even within a well-resourced healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"156 ","pages":"4634"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/4634","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AE-COPD) significantly worsen patient outcomes; however, COPD is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated despite established guidelines.This study aimed to assess (1) the characteristics of patients hospitalised for a first episode of AE-COPD, (2) the differences between patients who had received guideline-recommended inhalation therapy prior to their first AE-COPD hospitalisation and those who had not, and (3) the associations between patient characteristics, pre-hospital inhalation treatment status and 1-year all-cause mortality following the index hospitalisation.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 1855 consecutive patients admitted with clinically and spirometrically diagnosed AE-COPD to a secondary-level Swiss hospital between September 2016 and September 2024 were analysed. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality following the index hospitalisation. Survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression, with results reported as hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Overall, 50.6% (n = 938) of patients lacked documented spirometric GOLD staging and 82.6% (n = 1533) had no recorded risk classification. Patients were stratified based on pre-admission use of long-acting inhalation therapy: Group 1 (no therapy, n = 834 [45.0%]) and Group 2 (therapy, n = 1021 [55.0%]). Baseline characteristics were largely comparable between groups; however, patients receiving long-acting inhalation therapy (Group 2) had significantly more patients with spirometrically confirmed COPD. During 1-year follow-up, 236 deaths (12.7%) occurred, in 133 of the 834 (15.9%) Group 1 patients and 103 of the 1021 (10.1%) Group 2 patients  (log-rank p <0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, no long-acting inhalation therapy (Group 1) as a variable was independently associated with higher 1-year all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 1.95, CI: 1.48-2.56, p <0.001).

Conclusion:  Significant diagnostic and therapeutic gaps were observed in patients hospitalised for the first episode of AE-COPD. Guideline-recommended inhalation therapy prior to hospitalisation was independently associated with decreased 1-year all-cause mortality. Our findings suggest that guideline-recommended inhalation therapy reflects structured COPD care, earlier diagnosis and closer medical follow-up rather than a pharmacological effect alone. Hospitalisation for AE-COPD represents a critical opportunity to reassess the diagnosis and optimise long-term management, even within a well-resourced healthcare system.

慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理的诊断和治疗差距及其与急性加重住院后1年生存率的关系
简介和目标:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)仍然是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因。慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重(AE-COPD)显著恶化患者预后;然而,尽管有既定的指导方针,慢性阻塞性肺病经常被误诊和治疗不足。本研究旨在评估(1)因急性阻塞性肺病(AE-COPD)首次住院患者的特征,(2)首次住院前接受指南推荐的吸入治疗与未接受指南推荐的吸入治疗的患者之间的差异,以及(3)患者特征、院前吸入治疗状态与指数住院后1年全因死亡率之间的关系。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,分析了2016年9月至2024年9月期间瑞士一家二级医院连续收治的1855例临床和肺活量测定诊断为AE-COPD的患者。主要终点是指数住院后的1年全因死亡率。使用Kaplan-Meier估计和Cox比例风险回归分析生存率,结果报告为95%置信区间的风险比。结果:总体而言,50.6% (n = 938)的患者缺乏记录的肺量测定GOLD分期,82.6% (n = 1533)的患者没有记录的风险分类。患者根据入院前使用长效吸入治疗的情况进行分层:1组(未治疗,n = 834[45.0%])和2组(治疗,n = 1021[55.0%])。两组间基线特征具有很大可比性;然而,接受长效吸入治疗的患者(第2组)有明显更多的肺活量测定证实的COPD患者。在1年的随访中,834例第1组患者中有133例(15.9%)死亡,1021例第2组患者中有103例(10.1%)死亡,共发生236例(12.7%)死亡。指南推荐的住院前吸入治疗与降低1年全因死亡率独立相关。我们的研究结果表明,指南推荐的吸入疗法反映了结构化的COPD护理、早期诊断和更密切的医学随访,而不仅仅是药物作用。急性阻塞性肺病住院治疗是重新评估诊断和优化长期管理的关键机会,即使在资源充足的医疗保健系统中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书