Limited evidence for reduced learning rate adaptation in anxious-depression, before or after treatment.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Stephanie Suddell, Lili Zhang, Chi Tak Lee, Jennifer Senta, Veronica O'Keane, Tomas Ward, Klaas Stephan, Celine Fox, Anna Hanlon, Kevin Lynch, Siobhan Harty, Derek Richards, Claire M Gillan
{"title":"Limited evidence for reduced learning rate adaptation in anxious-depression, before or after treatment.","authors":"Stephanie Suddell, Lili Zhang, Chi Tak Lee, Jennifer Senta, Veronica O'Keane, Tomas Ward, Klaas Stephan, Celine Fox, Anna Hanlon, Kevin Lynch, Siobhan Harty, Derek Richards, Claire M Gillan","doi":"10.1017/S0033291726105698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior research shows that humans adjust their learning rate based on environmental volatility. This adaptation has been shown to be reduced in individuals with high levels of anxious-depression, but past studies have been cross-sectional, making it unclear whether this adaptation is trait-like or responsive to treatment. There are also questions about the basic replicability of this effect with recent studies failing to find robust associations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In the Precision in Psychiatry study, we examined changes in learning rate adaptation in a points-loss task, following four weeks of treatment in two patient groups receiving either internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (<i>n</i> = 677) or antidepressants (<i>n</i> = 95), compared to a group of healthy participants (<i>n</i> = 95).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups showed increased learning rates in volatile environments at baseline, but against our prediction, learning rate adaptation was not cross-sectionally associated with individual differences in anxious-depression. There was also no evidence that learning rate adaptation changed post-treatment, despite symptom improvements. However, in the antidepressant group, symptom reductions correlated with learning rate adaptation. This finding should be interpreted cautiously as we found that the key outcome measure had poor test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, our results suggest that associations between learning rate adaptation and anxious-depression, if present, are likely modest, depend on task characteristics, may not be present in treatment-seeking adults, and do not improve following treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"56 ","pages":"e302"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291726105698","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prior research shows that humans adjust their learning rate based on environmental volatility. This adaptation has been shown to be reduced in individuals with high levels of anxious-depression, but past studies have been cross-sectional, making it unclear whether this adaptation is trait-like or responsive to treatment. There are also questions about the basic replicability of this effect with recent studies failing to find robust associations.

Method: In the Precision in Psychiatry study, we examined changes in learning rate adaptation in a points-loss task, following four weeks of treatment in two patient groups receiving either internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (n = 677) or antidepressants (n = 95), compared to a group of healthy participants (n = 95).

Results: All groups showed increased learning rates in volatile environments at baseline, but against our prediction, learning rate adaptation was not cross-sectionally associated with individual differences in anxious-depression. There was also no evidence that learning rate adaptation changed post-treatment, despite symptom improvements. However, in the antidepressant group, symptom reductions correlated with learning rate adaptation. This finding should be interpreted cautiously as we found that the key outcome measure had poor test-retest reliability.

Conclusions: Overall, our results suggest that associations between learning rate adaptation and anxious-depression, if present, are likely modest, depend on task characteristics, may not be present in treatment-seeking adults, and do not improve following treatment.

治疗前后焦虑抑郁患者学习率适应降低的证据有限。
背景:先前的研究表明,人类会根据环境的波动来调整自己的学习速度。这种适应在高焦虑抑郁水平的个体中被证明是减少的,但过去的研究是横断面的,因此不清楚这种适应是像特质一样还是对治疗有反应。由于最近的研究未能找到强有力的关联,对这种效应的基本可重复性也存在疑问。方法:在精神病学的精确性研究中,我们对两组接受基于互联网的认知行为疗法(n = 677)或抗抑郁药物(n = 95)的患者进行了为期四周的治疗后,与一组健康参与者(n = 95)相比,检查了失分任务中学习率适应的变化。结果:所有组在基线时均表现出在波动环境中的学习率增加,但与我们的预测相反,学习率适应与焦虑-抑郁的个体差异没有横断面相关性。尽管症状有所改善,但也没有证据表明学习率适应在治疗后发生了变化。然而,在抗抑郁药物组,症状减轻与学习率适应相关。这一发现应谨慎解释,因为我们发现关键结果测量具有较差的测试-重测信度。结论:总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,学习率适应和焦虑抑郁之间的关联,如果存在,可能是适度的,取决于任务特征,可能不存在于寻求治疗的成年人中,并且在治疗后不会改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书