Standing Up to Dysglycemia: Textile Electromyography Identifies Hamstring Muscle Activity Benefits.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Qingyang Li, Christian J Brakenridge, Jiawei Qin, Xiyun Li, Suvi Lamberg, Taija Finni, Neville Owen, Arto J Pesola, Ying Gao
{"title":"Standing Up to Dysglycemia: Textile Electromyography Identifies Hamstring Muscle Activity Benefits.","authors":"Qingyang Li, Christian J Brakenridge, Jiawei Qin, Xiyun Li, Suvi Lamberg, Taija Finni, Neville Owen, Arto J Pesola, Ying Gao","doi":"10.1111/sms.70371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Standing shows inconsistent associations with glycemic profiles. This study examined whether thigh muscle activity during standing modifies the association between standing time and glycemic profiles under free-living conditions. Thirty physically inactive young women contributed 52 participant-days while wearing a continuous glucose monitor, thigh-worn accelerometer, and textile electromyography (EMG) shorts. Waking behavior was classified into sitting, standing, and moving and expressed as a three-part compositional time-use variable. During standing, quadriceps and hamstring EMG were summarized as average normalized amplitude and active duration. Outcomes were mean glucose, coefficient of variation (CV), time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), and time below range (TBR). Regression models tested whether standing-specific EMG metrics moderated associations between behavior composition and glycemic outcomes. Standing was not independently associated with glycemic outcomes. Hamstring EMG active duration moderated the association between standing and TIR (β = 0.473, 95% CI [0.277, 0.668], p < 0.001, Cohen's f<sup>2</sup> = 0.15) and TBR (β = -0.467, 95% CI [-0.653, -0.282], p < 0.001, Cohen's f<sup>2</sup> = 0.153), but not TAR, CV, or mean glucose after multiple testing correction. A higher standing proportion was associated with higher TIR when hamstring EMG active duration exceeded 38.8% and lower TBR when it exceeded 29.7%; below 16.8%, a higher standing proportion was associated with lower TIR. These findings suggest that the potential glycemic benefits of standing may depend on hamstring muscle engagement, highlighting EMG-derived muscle engagement as a marker for distinguishing physiologically heterogeneous forms of standing.</p>","PeriodicalId":21466,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports","volume":"36 10","pages":"e70371"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.70371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Standing shows inconsistent associations with glycemic profiles. This study examined whether thigh muscle activity during standing modifies the association between standing time and glycemic profiles under free-living conditions. Thirty physically inactive young women contributed 52 participant-days while wearing a continuous glucose monitor, thigh-worn accelerometer, and textile electromyography (EMG) shorts. Waking behavior was classified into sitting, standing, and moving and expressed as a three-part compositional time-use variable. During standing, quadriceps and hamstring EMG were summarized as average normalized amplitude and active duration. Outcomes were mean glucose, coefficient of variation (CV), time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), and time below range (TBR). Regression models tested whether standing-specific EMG metrics moderated associations between behavior composition and glycemic outcomes. Standing was not independently associated with glycemic outcomes. Hamstring EMG active duration moderated the association between standing and TIR (β = 0.473, 95% CI [0.277, 0.668], p < 0.001, Cohen's f2 = 0.15) and TBR (β = -0.467, 95% CI [-0.653, -0.282], p < 0.001, Cohen's f2 = 0.153), but not TAR, CV, or mean glucose after multiple testing correction. A higher standing proportion was associated with higher TIR when hamstring EMG active duration exceeded 38.8% and lower TBR when it exceeded 29.7%; below 16.8%, a higher standing proportion was associated with lower TIR. These findings suggest that the potential glycemic benefits of standing may depend on hamstring muscle engagement, highlighting EMG-derived muscle engagement as a marker for distinguishing physiologically heterogeneous forms of standing.

抵抗血糖异常:织物肌电图识别腘绳肌活动的益处。
站立与血糖的关系不一致。本研究考察了在自由生活条件下站立时大腿肌肉活动是否会改变站立时间和血糖分布之间的关系。30名不运动的年轻女性参与了52天的实验,她们穿着连续血糖监测仪、大腿上佩戴的加速度计和纺织品肌电图短裤。醒着的行为分为坐、站和移动,并以三部分组成的时间使用变量表示。站立时,股四头肌和腘绳肌肌电图总结为平均归一化振幅和活动持续时间。结果包括平均血糖、变异系数(CV)、范围内时间(TIR)、范围上时间(TAR)和范围下时间(TBR)。回归模型测试了站立特异性肌电图指标是否调节了行为构成和血糖结局之间的关联。站立与血糖结局没有独立关联。腿筋肌电活动持续时间调节了站立与TIR (β = 0.473, 95% CI [0.277, 0.668], p 2 = 0.15)和TBR (β = -0.467, 95% CI [-0.653, -0.282], p 2 = 0.153)之间的相关性,但在多重测试校正后,对TAR、CV或平均血糖没有影响。当腿筋肌电活动时间超过38.8%时,站立比例越高,其TIR越高;当腿筋肌电活动时间超过29.7%时,其TBR越低;低于16.8%时,较高的站立比例与较低的TIR相关。这些研究结果表明,站立的潜在血糖益处可能取决于腿筋肌的活动,强调肌电图衍生的肌肉活动是区分生理上不同形式站立的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.90%
发文量
162
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports is a multidisciplinary journal published 12 times per year under the auspices of the Scandinavian Foundation of Medicine and Science in Sports. It aims to publish high quality and impactful articles in the fields of orthopaedics, rehabilitation and sports medicine, exercise physiology and biochemistry, biomechanics and motor control, health and disease relating to sport, exercise and physical activity, as well as on the social and behavioural aspects of sport and exercise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书