Mentalizing & InteRpersonal Recognition of Others' Relational States (MIRROR): a patient-directed intervention for navigating clinical encounters in chronic pain.

IF 1.7 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jolin B Yamin, Arvina Grahl, Alessandra Anzolin, Thi Dieu Ni Doan, Seneca Ellis, Lara Gardiner, Isabella Hewardt, Soo Ahn Lee, Jeungchan Lee, John M Kelley, Ted Kaptchuk, Vitaly Napadow, Robert R Edwards
{"title":"Mentalizing & InteRpersonal Recognition of Others' Relational States (MIRROR): a patient-directed intervention for navigating clinical encounters in chronic pain.","authors":"Jolin B Yamin, Arvina Grahl, Alessandra Anzolin, Thi Dieu Ni Doan, Seneca Ellis, Lara Gardiner, Isabella Hewardt, Soo Ahn Lee, Jeungchan Lee, John M Kelley, Ted Kaptchuk, Vitaly Napadow, Robert R Edwards","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2026.2740677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic pain can lead to challenges in social functioning that extend into healthcare. The Mentalizing & InteRpersonal Recognition of Others' Relational States (MIRROR) intervention was developed to support patients' relational and communication skills in healthcare by targeting mentalizing (the ability to understand mental states of oneself and others). This paper describes MIRROR and reports preliminary findings regarding feasibility and acceptability across two pain samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP, mean age 39.64 ± 16.37) and 12 patients with fibromyalgia (FM, mean age 38.83 ± 15.25) completed the four-session intervention. Questionnaires assessed session value and applicability, perceived benefit and generalization, and Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Session ratings reflected moderate-to-high value and applicability (mean over 4 sessions: cLBP 1.22 ± 0.46, FM 1.45 ± 0.46; scale: -2 to 2), and perceived benefit and generalization (mean cLBP 0.88 ± 0.77, FM 0.71 ± 0.58; scale: -2 to 2). Exploratory pre-post changes in PEPPI scores indicated a medium effect observed in cLBP (Hedges' g = 0.52) and a small effect in FM (Hedges' g = 0.10). Open-ended feedback supported acceptability and feasibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MIRROR appears feasible and acceptable as an intervention engaging mentalizing methods for enhancing patients' ability to navigate clinical interactions. Further research should evaluate whether engaging mentalizing abilities improves subsequent healthcare communication and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT06157866.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2740677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic pain can lead to challenges in social functioning that extend into healthcare. The Mentalizing & InteRpersonal Recognition of Others' Relational States (MIRROR) intervention was developed to support patients' relational and communication skills in healthcare by targeting mentalizing (the ability to understand mental states of oneself and others). This paper describes MIRROR and reports preliminary findings regarding feasibility and acceptability across two pain samples.

Methods: Eleven patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP, mean age 39.64 ± 16.37) and 12 patients with fibromyalgia (FM, mean age 38.83 ± 15.25) completed the four-session intervention. Questionnaires assessed session value and applicability, perceived benefit and generalization, and Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI).

Results: Session ratings reflected moderate-to-high value and applicability (mean over 4 sessions: cLBP 1.22 ± 0.46, FM 1.45 ± 0.46; scale: -2 to 2), and perceived benefit and generalization (mean cLBP 0.88 ± 0.77, FM 0.71 ± 0.58; scale: -2 to 2). Exploratory pre-post changes in PEPPI scores indicated a medium effect observed in cLBP (Hedges' g = 0.52) and a small effect in FM (Hedges' g = 0.10). Open-ended feedback supported acceptability and feasibility.

Conclusions: MIRROR appears feasible and acceptable as an intervention engaging mentalizing methods for enhancing patients' ability to navigate clinical interactions. Further research should evaluate whether engaging mentalizing abilities improves subsequent healthcare communication and outcomes.

Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT06157866.

对他人关系状态的心理化和人际认知(MIRROR):一种以患者为导向的干预,用于引导慢性疼痛的临床遭遇。
慢性疼痛可导致延伸到医疗保健的社会功能的挑战。“他人关系状态的心理化与人际认知”(MIRROR)干预旨在通过心理化(理解自己和他人心理状态的能力)来支持患者在医疗保健中的关系和沟通技巧。本文描述了镜像和报告关于可行性和可接受性在两个疼痛样本的初步发现。方法:11例慢性腰痛患者(cLBP,平均年龄39.64±16.37)和12例纤维肌痛患者(FM,平均年龄38.83±15.25)完成4期干预。问卷评估了会话价值和适用性,感知益处和泛化,以及在医患互动(PEPPI)中的感知疗效。结果:疗程评分反映了中至高的价值和适用性(平均4次疗程:cLBP 1.22±0.46,FM 1.45±0.46;量表:-2至2),以及感知到的获益和泛化(平均cLBP 0.88±0.77,FM 0.71±0.58;量表:-2至2)。PEPPI评分的探索性前后变化表明,在cLBP中观察到中等影响(Hedges' g = 0.52),在FM中观察到小影响(Hedges' g = 0.10)。开放式反馈支持可接受性和可行性。结论:MIRROR作为一种介入的心智化方法,对于提高患者驾驭临床互动的能力是可行和可接受的。进一步的研究应该评估参与心理化能力是否能改善随后的医疗保健沟通和结果。临床试验注册:www.clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT06157866。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书